 | This article was nominated for deletion on October 18, 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
A bit of a mess edit
This article needs some major revision. I work for Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. (formerly Vistakon), but I can't tell if this article is about the company or the product. Most of the information is dated, bordering on obsolete. I would recommend the creation of a Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc. article with subpages for the various products.
PaulNeb86 (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
It would be nice if someone "in the know" would add an explanation of what the differences are between the different Acuvue sub-brands. From a consumer perspective, what are each good for? Why would one choose Acuvue Advance or Acuvue Oasys over Acuvue, for example. --Srleffler 22:01, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- Although the wording could be better, I tried to help out the article with a bit more information regarding these things.AED 23:15, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I have added some info on brands and will add more consumer information when I get time —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.104.158.102 (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Limerick plant edit
The section on the Limerick plant has no citations and reads like a brochure... probably should be deleted, no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcdon10 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I agree; seems like there is bias throughout that entire section. (J.gastaldello (talk) 03:50, 10 April 2013 (UTC))
Unreferenced edit
The History section is unreferenced, it shows no proof that the infomration is correct or verified. Flagged the section as needing more citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisrokz (talk • contribs) 09:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)