Talk:Action of 27 June 1798
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Skinny87 in topic GA Review
 | Action of 27 June 1798 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Action of 27 June 1798/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- 'but despite an extensive search Foote was unable to relay the information to Nelson before the Battle of the Nile on 1 August.' - Would this be about the location of the convoy? If so , it would be best to clarify that. Also, I assume you mean he searched for Nelson, but couldn't find him? Clarification again would be good.
- 'Much of this was auctioned off, while other treasures were to be transported to France, along with men wounded during the invasion and dispatches carried by General Louis Baraguey d'Hilliers' - I would mention here that d'Hilliers was wounded, as it's mentioned in the lede.
- 'The storm had also detached the squadron's frigates,' - I don't think 'detached' is the correct phrasing here, as the storm didn't command them :)
- 'to be joined by additional forces from Genoa, Corsica and Civitavecchia it passed south through the Ligurian Sea' - 'as it passed', only a minor thing.
- 'Among the goods seized from the frigate were the complete French code books' - Code books for what? A part of the military, or all of it? Or did it contain diplomatic codes as well?
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Is there a wikilink anywhere we can add for the French invasion of Malta?
- a (references):
- The best account of it on Wikipedia (though I say so myself), is at Mediterranean campaign of 1798, which is already linked. I didn't have enough material to write a whole article on it, although with the right reference materials I expect one could be drawn up.
- Just curious, any idea what happened to Foote or his First Lieutenant?
- Foote has his own article, from which I incorporated some information about his service in the following year. I have no further information about Lieutenant Wilmot I'm afraid.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
An excellent article, with very little to do - but then that describes all of your article, Jacky. Look forward to passing it, and excellent reading as usual. Skinny87 (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the reivew. I always appreciate your reviews, you leave thoughtful comments and questions that never fail to improve the article, and your input is always greatly appreciated. I have addressed all of the points above except those at which I have left replies. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
- No problem :) Looks good, no problems with promoting this. Skinny87 (talk) 09:43, 19 December 2009 (UTC)