Talk:Action of 22 October 1793

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Action of 22 October 1793/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 00:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Its been eight days - can you let me know what needs doing?--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox;
  • a lone British Royal Navy ship of the line; what is the need to mention "lone" because the counterpart also had only one ship.

• They had more, made it clearer.

• • attacked the large French Navy frigate Melpomène off the coast of Sardinia; usage of "large", declaration of frigate gives the reader an idea about ship's size, I don't think a specific mention is needed.

• I've moved it so its clearer, but I've kept large (and later small) to emphasise the relative sizes of the ships.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

• • In the strength section of infoxbox, insert an {{nbsp}} amid HMS Agamemnon.
• Section 1;
  • Link Vice-Admiral
  • small 64-gun HMS Agamemnon; usage of "small" may not be required
  • young Captain Horatio Nelson
  • Link Commodore
  • small 28-gun frigate Mignonne and 14-gun brig-sloop Hazard; use of "small"

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

• Section 2;
  • held a council of war to decided "decide" whether the action should be renewed
  • Everything else looks good
• Section 3;
  • A comma after "Following the engagement"
  • Everything else looks good
• The image used doesn't have a valid license. Please do the needful.
• No plagiarism found. External links OK.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

• All done or otherwise fixed. Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 08:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)