Talk:Actinium(III) chloride
Latest comment: 2 years ago by No such user in topic Requested move 25 May 2021
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 25 May 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus. No such user (talk) 12:00, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- Actinium(III) chloride → Actinium chloride
- Actinium(III) bromide → Actinium bromide
- Actinium(III) iodide → Actinium iodide
- Actinium(III) oxide → Actinium oxide
- Actinium(III) phosphate → Actinium phosphate
- Actinium(III) sulfide → Actinium sulfide
– The +3 oxidation state is the only one known for actinium. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. Elli (talk | contribs) 19:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)—Relisting. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support. The current forms will make good redirects. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. There is Actinium(II) hydride which has a +2 oxidation state. I don't really support not putting the ions there when it is not a group 1 or 2 metal. Keres🌑(talk • ctb) 23:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. We overwhelmingly use Stock nomenclature for simple salts like this. --Project Osprey (talk) 22:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose HS chem was a long time ago, but isn't this per convention? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.