This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
A fact from Abu Salabikh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 September 2008, and was viewed approximately 222 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Perhaps the confused editor will explain its confusion. Then the article can be edited to suit.--Wetman (talk) 01:40, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Disambiguating appositive phrases and more specific links, with added references, should make the article even clearer. Any further, specific points?--Wetman (talk) 15:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, we have been vaguely using a set format for ANE archaeological article
like Eshnunna and Kish, with a See also and all. But thats not set
in stone. :-)
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I tucked a section for Eresh into this article on the basis that it might actually be Eresh and that a section redirect was a FAR better fate then the current dead end disambiguation landing spot for Eresh.Ploversegg (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply