Talk:Abstract rewriting machine

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Pumpapa in topic Notability?

Notability?

edit

This appears to be a long-dead academic project: the software is no longer maintained. Its papers appeared in TOPLAS, a journal, which by CS standards isn't that great. The theoretical contributions of these appear unclear to me. I don't see here much more the average run of the mill, unmaintained academic software. I could be wrong... Pcap ping 00:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

added four references of (continuing) research Pumpapa (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Currently (2021) working on a new implementation based on this principle. Currently (2021) working on a book based on this principle. Pumpapa (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abstract rewriting machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply