Talk:704th Fighter Squadron

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Incorrect photograph used in the article edit

The photo in the sidebar of this article does *not* portray an F-16 belonging to 704FS. The photo shows F-16C 85-0410, which belongs to the 457th FS based at Fort Worth. The 457th inherited the tail code "TX" after the 704th was disbanded; and uses the same tail band design; which must have been the cause of this confusion. For the sake of accuracy, I would recommend removal of the photo.

If you think this is so, you should cite a source. The link to the image identifies it as a plane of the 924th Fighter Wing (not the 301st). Don't know if you considered that the plane may have been assigned to both units at different times. By the way, the 704th has never been disbanded. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Perfectly open to reliable sources on the squadron, but without a contrary source, gotta rely on Wikimedia, which indicates its from the 704th. In the spirit of Rodney King, maybe a switch to a non-contraversial 704th image would be goos.--Lineagegeek (talk) 23:38, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 704th Fighter Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply