Talk:45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2019Peer reviewReviewed
September 15, 2019Good article nomineeListed
October 4, 2019WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

WW2 Brigades edit

I see the point of using hyperlinks to pages that do not currently exist, on the basis that this might prompt someone to create those pages. However, pages already exist for the 134th & 135th Bdes! Of course, these pages don't have much info and are wholly focussed on WW1 - then again, the page for the 136th bde is just the same.

I have turned the subheadings for the Bdes into hyperlinks to these pages, as it seemed pointless to have a title then a separate hyperlink. However, if this is contrary to the 'correct style', or mucks up anything, please let me know and I'll gladly amend.Glevum (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom) edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Becke57":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 15:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Article is under construction. Will add template. Hamish59 (talk) 15:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 45th Infantry Division (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply