Talk:322d Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merger

edit

322d Strategic Reconnaissance Squadron should be merged into this article per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME, which indicates that an article about a unit, formation, or base should be placed at "Name (optional disambiguator)". When a unit has had multiple names over the course of its existence, the title should generally be the last name used. The bombardment name is more recent than the strategic reconnaissance name. Both articles were created in 2010 by the same editor. The initial material in both articles' History section was the same through 1957. In addition, the strategic reconnaissance article contains major errors, including a fictional history from 1947-1949. Once the merger is complete, the article can be moved to its most current name as an expeditionary unit. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Suggest you WP:BOLD and merge them. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:46, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Without objection

--Lineagegeek (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 322d Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply