Talk:2008 western India bombings

(Redirected from Talk:29 September 2008 western India bombings)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Do any governmental sources exist? edit

There are a lot of references here, but I do not see any to publications by the government of India. Does anyone know of any statement published by the Indian government describing this incident? Blue Rasberry 23:36, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

source edit

Gangan, Surendra (April 9, 2010). "Abhinav Bharat used derogatory words against RSS chief: RR Patil - dnaindia.com". Daily News & Analysis. Diligent Media Corporation. Retrieved 23 July 2010.

29 September 2008 western India bombings is this notable? edit

Hi, "29 September 2008 western India bombings" is this heading notable or an attempt to make these bombings notable as "29 September 2008 western India bombings"? Please discuss.Thisthat2011 (talk) 08:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notability is independently established for each article. See WP:N. Also your question is asking users to compare one thing to itself. Blue Rasberry (talk) 08:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Is notability independently established for each article? I am unsure of notability of this as I am reading about this first time today.Thisthat2011 (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 29 September 2008 western India bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 29 September 2008 western India bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply