Talk:2015 Sadr City market truck bombing
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ohconfucius in topic Including Reactions sections
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | A news item involving 2015 Sadr City market truck bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 14 August 2015. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Including Reactions sections edit
@Ohconfucius: In regard to your edit here, reactions standard for such attack pages, even you don't 'like them'. Please see:
.... numerous other bombing attacks495656778774 (talk) 23:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- User:LimitationsAndRestrictions495656778774: it's certainly not a case of whether i like the sections or not. Reaction sections do have a place, I warrant, but not the sort exclusively containing empty rhetoric and meaningless platitudes as those you reinstated in the Tianjin explosions article or this Baghdad bombing article. For every current events article where there is a Reactions section with these soundbites, there is one (if not more) without. There is, for example July 2009 Ürümqi riots – a Featured Article, no less. I particularly like the Reactions section in 2011 Chinese pro-democracy protests, which captures reactions informatively and is low on unencyclopaedic content. I hope you see my point. Can we work towards achieving that standard of encyclopaedic content for this article? Regards, -- Ohc ¡digame! 15:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)