Talk:2013–14 in English football

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Transfers Section edit

Someone has added a Transfers section to the article without discussion (there has not been one previously). While I think there is a place for a transfers section in this article I do not believe that the table as it exists is the most suitable form. The issues I have are

  1. The number of transfers listed is very arbitrary and barely covers the subject over the whole of english football in the summer of 2013
  2. The fact that it is the 'top 5 most expensive' means that it currently relies on speculation from the press on the values of the transfers that take place

What we need in this section is something that:

  1. Summarises the transfer activity of all of the professional leagues
  2. Does not rely on speculation
  3. Does not repeat everything in here or here

I am open to suggestions as to what we include but I don't like what is there at the moment and will remove it once a better suggestion has been agreed.=> Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 16:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

As there has been no suggestions I'm removing the speculative table. => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 18:56, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Premier League Table edit

Footnote 1 to the Premier League table is attached to Everton and Tottenham and reads as follows:

"1 Since the winners of 2013–14 FA Cup and 2013–14 Football League Cup (Arsenal and Manchester City) qualified for the 2014–15 UEFA Champions League, the 5th and 6th placed teams qualified for the group stage and the play-off round of 2014–15 UEFA Europa League."

In accordance with UEFA Europa League qualification rules the footnote should be attached only to the 6th placed team (Tottenham) and should read:

"1 Since the winners of the 2013–14 Football League Cup (Manchester City) qualified for the 2014–15 UEFA Champions League, the 6th placed team qualified for the play-off round of 2014–15 UEFA Europa League."

This needs to be changed by someone who knows how to do it, please. Sherwin35 (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I get what you are saying but I dont totally agree. What is also meant to be said is that since Arsenal and City won the 5th placed team qualified for group stage instead of play-off which also needs to be stated. I will see if I can find an other way to modify the sentence to make it clearer. QED237 (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2013–14 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 19 external links on 2013–14 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on 2013–14 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply