Talk:2011 Australian football code crowds

This page was proposed for deletion by Matt294069 (talk · contribs) on 9 May 2019.

Australia: Sports / Australian rules football / Soccer / Rugby league Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2011 Australian football code crowds is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rugby league (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2011 Australian football code crowds was copied or moved into 2012 Australian football code crowds with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Move A-League numbers forward one year edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The general soccer convention is that if you need to categorise a season as part of one year, you use the latter year, i.e. FIFA 12 for the 2011-12 season. In that vein, I think we should move the A-League forward one year, so, putting the 2011-12 figures in the 2012 Australian football code crowds article. - The Frederick (talk) 11:37, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agreed - I wouldn't use a computer game as the basis, but it does make sense. From a football perspective, this article should encompass the 2010-11 A-League season. Ck786 (talk) 00:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

NAB Cup in team list edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you wish to discuss whether or not the NAB Cup should be listed in the "Averages by team" list, do so hear. Do NOT just make the changes as you feel. The Frederick (talk) 10:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why is the NAB Cup and ACL included, yet Origin and Tri-Nations not? It clearly states "league competitions that are more than 1 game in length". All of those competitions (NAB Cup, ACL, SoO Tri-Nations) should be left out, as they don't provide a true indicator of each nation/clubs average attendence. In addition, there are sections under attendences that are more appropriate for those matches. Eg, Pre Season is pretty clear streight forward representation of the NAB Cup, and Rep matches is the best way to list Tri Nations, ACL and State of Origin fixtures. Otherwise, averages for all the teams in these comps should be included on the team list. Can't have one rule for AFL clubs and one for everyone else (which is what it seems you are promoting)

Use of official names for teams edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I propose that we use just the official name or official trading name for each club or team, unless that name will easily be confused for another. Gold Coast Suns can just by called by their official name "Gold Coast", for example. The Frederick (talk) 05:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

That is a poor idea. Names used should reflect the clubs geographical name, unless they are more commonly known by their moniker. Eg, Brisbane is associated with the Broncos first and foremost, so the AFL side should be known as the "Brisbane Lions". Similarily, Melbourne Deamons should have first dibs on the name "Melbourne" where the Rebels, Storm, Victory and Heart should go by their full name. With regards to the Suns, they are the newest team (and arguably least followed) on the Gold Coast. Why should they be called "Gold Coast" over the Titans or United? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.19.135.180 (talk) 02:57, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2011 Australian football code crowds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 28 external links on 2011 Australian football code crowds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic