Talk:2011–2012 Strait of Hormuz dispute

An awfully big article for something that hasn't happened yet (or you could argue that it has been going on since the Iranian revolution). Wikipedia is not a current affairs website so I move for deletion or reversion to Userspace until things resolve themselves. On a personal note, I have actually been at the sharp end of things at the Musandam Peninsula. Namely the airfield at Khasab with two SEPECAT Jaguar aircraft of the Royal Air Force of Oman.Petebutt (talk) 04:26, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

I tend to think that it is an finite incident with long-term issues and therefore needs coverage. Marcd30319 (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Is this truly an ongoing dispute or an isolated incident?

I am wondering about the underlying premise that this specific dispute is an ongoing event or that it ended on February 14, 2012 when that American-British-French naval flotilla transited the Strait of Hormuz. The subsequent events outlined after February 14, 2012 seem less germane to the proximate cause of the crisis regarding the carrier Stennis's transit of the Strait of Hormuz and the initial Iranian demands about its return to the Persian Gulf. If so, why not move the naval activities after the February 14th date to the Consequences section, and split this section into two sub-sections, one for oil prices and the other on naval activities? Thank you. Marcd30319 (talk) 18:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.naval-technology.com/news/newsiranian-navy-completes-velayat-91-naval-exercise

  Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 22:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2011–12 Strait of Hormuz dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322235837/http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk:80/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2012/March/20/120320-Daring-Carriers to http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2012/March/20/120320-Daring-Carriers
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150603110206/http://subyraman.com/iran-and-the-strait-of-hormuz/ to http://subyraman.com/iran-and-the-strait-of-hormuz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Ongoing?

2011-2012 is ongoing? Also the dispute section needs a rewrite so it isnt just 'date - thing happened, date 2 thing happened', it's really poor as it stands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoriosissimus (talk • contribs) 10:00, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Yep! a Change Name of the article urgently needed and update with current events.Mr.User200 (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2019 (UTC)