This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Obviously, the title is OK for now, but the article will need to be moved at some point per WP:AVIMOS to either Filair Flight xxxx or 2010 Filair Let-410 Turbolet crash if no flight number can be ascertained. For the moment, the priority is expansion of the article and defeating the AfD nomination. Mjroots (talk) 20:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have written some more information on nl:Filaircrash 2010 about the cause of the crash (I noted that you understand Dutch). Many remained unclear, but since a few days, consensus seems to be achieved. Greetings, Belgian man (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Honestly, I don't know what you're on about. The revision when you posted this request for cleanup contained no fragments. The prose isn't at its best, but there were no fragments. Protector of Wiki (talk) 22:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Exactly what I thought. Strange comment of Griffinofwales, and not constructive at all. Greetings, Belgian man (talk) 22:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
By the way, why did you restore this sentence? The previous sentence already says the aircraft crashed into a house, so repeating it would simply be redundant. Protector of Wiki (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Excuse me, I didn't see that. Maybe it has something to do with all these references that trouble the overview at the editing page rather extremely. I restored it. Greetings, Belgian man (talk) 16:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
The references can be separated if you add this tool to your .js page. sonia♫ 11:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
<-I can't find what I was referring to, but the Accident section could use a rewrite. "Most of the dead were Congolese" isn't a real sentence, and should be merged with another one. PoW, I'd like it if you'd stop stalking my edits just because I blocked you at a different WMF project. Griffinofwales (talk) Come and join theSimple English Wikipedia 16:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am gratified that you have truthfully explained your assumptions of bad faith. I dislike dishonesty more than most. I endeavor to keep The Big Boys honest, which includes you since you immigrated over here, so do not continue our disputes here. I could call you out for abusive blocks on The Little Boys place that are do not occur here, but I'm not a petty person. Drop the conspiracy theory, and move away from the dead horse. "Most of the dead were Congolese" isn't a real sentence Seriously? Protector of Wiki (talk) 23:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
