Talk:2009 MLS SuperDraft

Red-links

Red-links might be taken as an invitation to create an article. Most of these players will not have references to qualify them for articles under WP:BIO other than by WP:ATHLETE, and they play in a professional sport but not (yet, at least) at a professional level. Kevin McE (talk) 20:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

OK, fair enough - but can you wait for a couple of hours? I'm doing some simultaneous work on the PDL pages where drafted players came from, and it would be INCREDIBLY helpful if you could leave the redlinks until I'm finished. --JonBroxton (talk) 21:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I think it really ought to be the other way round. Give it two hours and these red links could easily be filled with premature bios on as of yet non-notable players. Why not delink them now, before we end up with dozens of potential PRODs or AFDs. Peanut4 (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Please change all previous SuperDrafts then. It's always been this way, it's easiest for season tracking and saves going back changing it throughout the season. RichardDSFAR (talk) 21:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

• Can we remove the redlinks for guys that never played in the PDL/USL? It might deter some article creation. Jogurney (talk) 22:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

The PDL is not a professional league, and none of the players (according to the info here) have played for USL div 1 or 2 teams. So that'll be all the redlinks then... Kevin McE (talk) 22:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, I was just about to do that. Adding the links back once the player makes his debut will be fairly easy. --JonBroxton (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Previous team

I'll admit to ignorance about the project, but it is not immediately clear from its article whether Generation Adidas is actually a team. Do 11 guys run onto a pitch as the Generation Adidas team to play against another team? If not, should it be in the pervious team slot, or should this contract be marked by an asterisk and explained as a footnote? Kevin McE (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I think the asterisk idea is a good one. From my understanding 'Generation Adidas' is not a team, but a contract option which MLS negotiates that allows certain young players to have their salaries not count against salary caps, and some other legal jiggery-pokery. --JonBroxton (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://web.mlsnet.com/mls/events/superdraft/2009/draft_tracker.jsp
  • In Jefferson Roblee on 2011-05-07 15:19:31, 404 Not Found
  • In 2009 MLS SuperDraft on 2011-06-17 17:54:03, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 MLS SuperDraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141108224716/http://go.dallasnews.com/news/2008/jul/28/fc-dallas-trades-arturo-alvarez-san-jose-2009-supe/ to http://go.dallasnews.com/news/2008/jul/28/fc-dallas-trades-arturo-alvarez-san-jose-2009-supe/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:05, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2009 MLS SuperDraft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725014905/http://blogs.sltrib.com/rsl/archive/2009_01_01_archive.htm to http://blogs.sltrib.com/rsl/archive/2009_01_01_archive.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)