Talk:2000 IIHF World Championship final

(Redirected from Talk:2000 IIHF World Championship Final)
Latest comment: 11 months ago by ClydeFranklin in topic Requested move 27 May 2023

Requested move 27 May 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 00:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply


– Per consensus at Talk:1930 FIFA World Cup final#Requested move 12 December 2022, WP:NCCAPS, and WP:LOWERCASE. Final is not a proper name, and the lowercase version seems to be supported by sources ([1][2][3][4]). All pages (except for the 2023 one) were boldly moved but were reverted after a request at WP:RMTR.

References

  1. ^ "Ice Hockey-Germany beat U.S to set up final showdown at worlds with Canada". Reuters. 27 May 2023.
  2. ^ "Canada edges Latvia to reach men's world hockey championship final". MSN.
  3. ^ "Germany beats US in overtime to set up final against Canada at ice hockey worlds". AP NEWS. 27 May 2023.
  4. ^ "Canada comes back to beat Latvia to punch ticket to World Championship final". TSN. 27 May 2023.
MaterialWorks 23:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@GoodDay and Hey man im josh: Pinging since you were the ones who made the moves originally. – MaterialWorks 23:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've contacted WP:HOCKEY, about this RM. GoodDay (talk) 00:44, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good call. Definitely appropriate to notify a group that this move affects. Hey man im josh (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support I don’t see why this would be any different then the successful move request the nominator linked to.--65.93.193.94 (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom, references to outside sources. Wracking 💬 05:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support: I don't believe this to a proper name and, as the nominator has shown, sources support this. Sorry if I caused any headaches to anybody with my bold moves. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
    You did good. Why GoodDay reverted without reason is more the question.
  • Neutral - I've given it a lot of thought (self-reflection never hurt anyone) & I'm content with either version. GoodDay (talk) 22:29, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support not inherently a proper noun, not necessary caps and not capped in independent sources per evidence provided - MOS:CAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per all. Dicklyon (talk) 02:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom's list of sources and relevant guidelines. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 08:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.