Notability of Article edit

I believe this article in not encyclopedic. Please refer to WP:NOT#STATS under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Please correct if this does not fall under said category. Monkeytheboy (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Does every year in Australian television merit a page written in list form? edit

The pages for *Year* in Australian television all do not seem to include an article. They are merely lists that provide little or no notable content. Pages have already been deleted before because of their consisting of only a template with broken links to uncreated pages. Most pages also seem to need references and most can be considered stubs. Even though an article, for the mere fact of it being a list, does not make it encyclopedic, it would depend on what the list is about.

Also, does the inclusion of a group of articles on the years in television history mean there will also be others about American television history by year? Mexican television by year? Russian television by year? And what events on television would be notable enough to include in the articles? Technically, anything that's past is historical, but would news be notable enough? If the Oscars are included, does that mean Premio Lo Nuestro is too due to the fact that is one of the most anticipated Spanish-speaking shows throughout the year by Latinos, though not by english speaking people, in the United States?Monkeytheboy (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply