Talk:Strangeways Prison riot
Strangeways Prison riot has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 8, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the 1990 Strangeways Prison riot at 25 days was the longest British prison riot? | ||||||||||
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2023. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Led to resulting child molester hysteria?
editThe riot directly led to wider resulting media hysteria about child molesters when Fleet Street and ITN etc suddenly realised that stories of them being beaten up during the riot sold very well and got very good TV ratings etc?
GA on hold
editJust a few terms that need to be explained within the article (rather than in the notes which is not convention for wikipedia) before it can be passed:-
- Please explain the meaning of Rule 43(a)
- Please make it clear how the prison officers were using Largactyl as I am assuming they weren't using it to treat schizophrenia
- What are Category A prisoners?
- Since there is no wiki article on it, what was the role of the press council?
Thanks Million_Moments (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia:Footnotes it is quite acceptable to explain Rule 43(a) and Category A prisoners in the footnotes section, and even featured articles do it. I personally think it would be distracting to include that much detail in the main text, and it would spoil the flow. Therefore I believe a footnote is the best place for them, but I'm open to discussion about an abridged version if you really think they need to go in the main text?
- The original Press Council was the fore-runner of the Press Complaints Commission. Perhaps amend the sentence to something like "In its last act before disbanding in 1991 and being replaced by the Press Complaints Commission..."?
- Largactyl is a tricky one. Rooftop protestor Barry Morton describes it: "A powerful drug that can ruin any human being for the rest of their life. The effects are as follows: it slows you down and makes your mind hallucinate and makes you lose your memory and slows down your speech. When you don't know you are doing it, you talk to yourself, but you find it hard to hold conversations with anybody for a long period. You don't remember doing things. Sometimes you live like this for days or maybe weeks, even months, depending on how much they inject you with. Seven prison officers held [redacted for BLP reasons] down and injected him several times and turned him into a cabbage. It's a brown liquid that affects you the minute it's injected into the body." It's futher expanded upon in a footnote in the same book "Largactyl, known in prison as the "liquid cosh", is the most commonly administered of a range of psychotropic drugs used extensively for control rather than medicinal purposes. For a detailed expose of the use of drugs for control purposes see: Medical Power in Prisons by Joe Sim, Open University Press 1990 and The Liquid Cosh by Mickey Peterson, Breakout Collective 1984." There's probably a couple of other sources about, depends how much information you want adding about it? Possibly just the addition of "sedative" before it would clarify it enough? One Night In Hackney303 15:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well shift the footnotes to directly behind the terms used rather than at the end of the sentance, as when originally reading the article I thought that these were just references for this sentence. As for Largatyl, something along the lines of "known is prisons as the liquid cosh and used to control prisoners" would do and I agree with your way of explaining the press council. Million_Moments (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- All done, thanks. One Night In Hackney303 16:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well shift the footnotes to directly behind the terms used rather than at the end of the sentance, as when originally reading the article I thought that these were just references for this sentence. As for Largatyl, something along the lines of "known is prisons as the liquid cosh and used to control prisoners" would do and I agree with your way of explaining the press council. Million_Moments (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
What is this book heavily referenced throughout the article "Jameson & Allison" with only the authors name, google throws up only this page for that combination like a googlewhack? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.171.251.77 (talk) 17:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Successful good article nomination
editI am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 26, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass
- 2. Factually accurate?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
Excellent article! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Million_Moments (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
£55m vs. £90m
editToday's BBC site has an article about the riot citing costs of £90m to rebuild the prison, compared to £55m in this article. I assume it's adjusted for inflation on the BBC site? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:12, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1990 Strangeways Prison riot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080413064952/http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/focus/display.var.1784377.0.0.php to http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/focus/display.var.1784377.0.0.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)