Talk:1979 World Series

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1979 World Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abc15.com/content/sports/stories/story/Penguins-win-game-7-of-the-Stanley-Cup-Finals/YKZeJKzXL0Cgtp9tKwczGw.cspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017082722/http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/teams/1979orioles.stm to http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/teams/1979orioles.stm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• 1979wsprogram.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic terms

Is it just me, or do the terms in this article seem unencyclopedic? Especially these: "The Bucs lineup featured..." (using this because bucs is just a nickname). "The tall and lean Kent Tekulve..." (obvious bias) "...giving Earl Weaver and his Orioles a déjà vu nightmare when the Bucs came back to win in seven games." (deja vu is more of a slang term than an encyclopedic term, Bucs again). and "when he should have sped back..." (he probably should have, but an encyclopedia article shouldn't be telling what someone should or shouldn't have done. Maybe "some critics say?"). There are probably some more, but I did not have enough time to look through the whole article. It seems this is a pattern in the world series articles. Just wondering if somebody could fix this or if I should put up a banner. --Ghinga7 (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC) So, I've put up the "unencyclopedic tone" template, if someone believes this is a mistake, please discuss it here. Ghinga7 (talk) 18:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)