Talk:1946 Polish people's referendum

Graphs

There is no way to know which color is yes and which is no. The graphs do not say, only percentage and colors. It's sloppy and the article doesn't say unless I am too tired to notice.

---Post script: The article DOES say but the graph does not. Being a graph I think it is HIGHLY important to include such simple information as which is yes and which is no being that it would take so little space. I cannot do this work as I have no software for it.. if it was the article I would change it, but the article is fine.----

71.102.11.209 (talk) 06:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

"Actual results"

Could somebody confirm for me the source of the "actual results" of the referendum vs. the "official results"? How do we know the "actual results" are accurate? Zcbeaton (talk) 10:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

According to the Polish Wikipedia, those results are from the Małopolska region (apparently the best preserved material), and the source indicated is "Czesław Osękowski, Referendum 30 czerwca 1946 roku w Polsce (Wydawnictwo Sejmowe).", i.e. a publication by the Polish Sejm [Parliament]; this seems to match a 2000 publication by him: Referendum 30 czerwca 1946 roku w Polsce, Warsaw, 2000.

Two publications by the Polish Senate mention a 2012 presentation by him about the same topic and with almost the same title, "Osękowski Cz., Referendum ludowe z 30 czerwca 1946 roku w Polsce i zniesienie Senatu, referat wygłoszony na konferencji naukowej Senat wtradycji i praktyce ustrojowej Rzeczypospolitej, Warszawa, 11 grudnia 2012 r. " [1] (p. 8) and [2] (p. 48). He is a professor of history from the University of Zielona Góra. --Valentinian ^{T / C} 18:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Polish people's referendum, 1946. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050405222603/http://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/58502_1.html to http://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/58502_1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723032842/http://bbb.livejournal.com/1269125.html to http://bbb.livejournal.com/1269125.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

26.9% or 29%?

The aftermath section currently states both "According to documents released forty years later, 29% of respondents had voted yes for all three questions" and "For the first question, "yes" was chosen by 26.9% voters." Which is claimed in the documents? Are numbers transposed? They can't both be true. Can't read Polish and am not sure which claim is true about these documents, so can't correct it. 146.115.84.237 (talk) 23:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)