Talk:1934 Hansel Valley earthquake
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Nihonjoe in topic Sources
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Utah may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Paragraphs and sections
editPer MOS:PARA, "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading". Therefore, having six tiny sections, each with a single short paragraph, makes it harder to read due to all the headers. There's no useful or helpful reason to split up everything into tiny sections. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:34, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Sources
edit@Dawnseeker2000: How is the KSL source not "suitable"? KSL is certainly reliable. Or are you somehow claiming the largest news organization in Utah is unreliable? Please get off your high horse and try discussing things instead of demanding the article be as you would prefer. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Are you also against having multiple sources that verify the same information? Since when were two sources too many? ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- And given how often big earthquakes happen in Utah, I certainly wouldn't consider this to be a "cascading maintenance nightmare". That's simply absurd. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not going to interact with you based on the tone used here and our previous interaction that was quite unpleasant for me, and one in which another editor deemed your behavior and actions to be troublesome. Take care brother. Dawnseeker2000 19:08, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Dawnseeker2000: If you're going to be simply reverting anything I do on this or other articles I've edited, you need to interact with me. Your tone in your reversions isn't all that pleasant, either, so this is simply carrying through on that. You're dismissive in your edit summaries, and you refuse to engage to explain why your preferred version of the article is better than that proposed by anyone else. This is a collaborative encyclopedia, so you can't simply force through your version and refuse to engage with others.
- As for the previous interaction, I honestly apologized for that because it was my misunderstanding of how that worked (which is quite different from any other such template, so my misunderstanding was understandable). I'm sorry if you can't find it in yourself to forgive my mistake and move on. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)