Talk:1900–1901 Cisleithanian legislative election

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Sceptre in topic Requested move 22 February 2022

Requested move 22 February 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. This close applies to all of the other related RMs. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


1900–1901 Cisleithanian legislative election1900–1901 legislative election in the Empire of Austria (1867–1918) – Per parent Category:Empire of Austria (1867–1918) and per WP:CommonName. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 21:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

But Empire of Austria (1867–1918) is the parent (and main) category of Cisleithania.Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
It would appear the category is misnamed; usual practice is for the category name to match the main article. Number 57 16:18, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
There was a debate at WP:CFD regarding Empire of Austria (1867–1918) vs Cisleithania as the category name; Empire of Austria (1867–1918) won. These renames are to preserve categorical and article consistency. Laurel Lodged (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
OK, well the article itself is still clearly more relevant in terms of naming alignment than the category, plus the title is out of sync with the naming guideline for election articles. If Cisleithania were to be renamed Empire of Austria (1867–1918), then the correct format for the election article would be "1900–1901 Austrian legislative election" rather than the proposed one. Number 57 16:46, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Or perhaps "1900–1901 Austrian Empire legislative election". Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
That is a correctly formulated title at least. However, I would suggestion you request the Cisleithania article be moved before these titles follow. Number 57 20:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

NOTE: To keep the discussion & arguments being made in this group of RMs from being fractured across multiple talk pages, all future arguments & discussions on several RMs should be made here. The affected RMs are Talk:1848 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022, Talk:1891 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022, Talk:1897 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022, Talk:1907 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022 and Talk:1911 Cisleithanian legislative election § Requested move 22 February 2022. Arguments already made there are moved here accordingly. Please continue the discussion below. Thanks! ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 21:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


Note to closer: Consider closing all of the aforementioned RMs as per the outcome of the discussion. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 21:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


 – Argument made by Srnec is moved here to avoid fracturing of discussion. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 21:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. Using "Empire of Austria" in this way is confusing and putting two dates in the title is worse. We could do "1891 Austrian legislative election", however. (My opinion is the same on all these RMs that should have been done as a multi-move.) Srnec (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Elections and Referendums has been notified of this discussion. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 21:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.