Talk:1790–91 United States House of Representatives elections

Latest comment: 1 year ago by LABoy12 in topic Chesapeak Party?

Seat totals don't add up edit

According to the infobox at the top of the page, 39 Pro-Administrationists and 30 Anti-Administrationists were elected to the 2nd House of Representatives. The accompanying map, however, as well as the table of state totals, shows the Pro-Administration party with 40 seats and the Anti-Administration party with 29 after late elections in Vermont and Kentucky are taken into account (while the state results table lists the "total" number of Pro-Administration members as "39," adding the number of Pro-Administration members from each state given in the table above yields a sum of 40). The U.S. House of Representatives Office of the Historian, a source for this article, gives 39–30 as the partisan composition of the House at the beginning of the 1791–1793 session. It is not clear what the source is for the state totals depicted in either the map or the state results table.

I don't want to delete these graphics wholesale, but there is clearly an error somewhere—either the infobox numbers are incorrect, or the map/table are. Personally, I'm inclined to believe 39–30 is the correct statistic because it is backed up by the official historian of the House, but I can't be sure where the error lies (or how to correct it) without a source for the state-by-state results of the election. Any insight into the source for the map/table or an alternative source for the state results would be appreciated. Nathaniel Greene (talk) 23:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1788 and 1789 United States House of Representatives elections which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chesapeak Party? edit

Why is Maryland listed as having been dominated by the "Chesapeak Party"? I didn't see any sources for it and the article doesn't elaborate on it. LABoy12 (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply