Talk:10.75×68mm Mauser

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 30 March 2018

Requested move 17 March 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved and repaired the internal copying of the page, to preserve edit history — JFG talk 05:53, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


10.75 x 68mm Mauser10.75×68mm – Using nomenclature used in Wikipedia firearms cartridge articles and possibly repair a talk page. Francis Flinch (talk) 19:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:10.75×68mm (moving) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 30 March 2018 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 01:43, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply



10.75×68mm10.75×68mm Mauser – Recognising this page was moved almost exactly one year ago, I suggest the name be changed again to be consistent with other Mauser cartidges such as 7×57mm Mauser and 7.92×57mm Mauser along with other European metric cartridges such as 6.5×54mm Mannlicher–Schönauer, 7.5×55mm Swiss and 9.3×64mm Brenneke. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 22:26, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Yes good point, following the outcome of this RM, if supported, I suggest we initiate a joint RM for the latter two, the former probably requires its own. Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 21:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC).Reply
@SmokeyJoe: thank you for your suggestions, unfortunately the names you have suggested are inconsistent with the current naming conventions for firearm cartridges across the project so I feel they are beyond the scope of this RM. Kind regards, Cavalryman V31 (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC).Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.