Talk:.nyc

Can it fail to be notable

Thanks for the rescue job. I've been following this story for some years (the video EL's are mine). As one of a handful of City TLDs likely to be delegated under ICANN's new rollout I don't see how it can fail to be notable. That said, the City's trumpeting of "approval" while reliably reported is a jumping of the gun somewhat. The .nyc tld has passed initial valuation - it is yet to be approved. It is assumed by the City and Neustar that the rest is a formality, but there are a few hoops yet. For instance, in a recent appearance in NYC the NTIA's Larry Strickling, in response to a question (17:10), spoke of not renewing .us with Neustar due to a lack of multistakeholderism in its management. Similar objections could yet arise w.r.t. .nyc. Wwwhatsup (talk) 01:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

https://livestream.com/internetsocietychapters/video?clipId=pla_3b920184-f5b7-4da0-b0fc-ac870008f59b is dead. 74.71.192.180 (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

ICANN Community objections

There was some back and forth in the ICANN community objection process. It isn't mentioned in the article thus far, but it can be found here. Wwwhatsup (talk) 13:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Advisory Board

I have just noticed that Tom Lowenhauopt extensively documented the Advisory Board's activities on the Coactivate website. https://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/community-advisory-board is the depature point. This should be digested and added to the article. Wwwhatsup (talk) 04:57, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

https://www.coactivate.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/community-advisory-board is dead. 74.71.192.180 (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)