Stainless steel is an alloy of iron that is resistant to rusting and corrosion. It contains at least 11% chromium and may contain elements such as carbon, other nonmetals and metals to obtain other desired properties. Stainless steel's resistance to corrosion results from the chromium, which forms a passive film that can protect the material and self-heal in the presence of oxygen.: 3
The alloy's properties, such as luster and resistance to corrosion and luster, are useful in many applications. Stainless steel can be rolled into sheets, plates, bars, wire, and tubing. These can be used in cookware, cutlery, surgical instruments, major appliances, vehicles, construction material in large buildings, industrial equipment (e.g., in paper mills, chemical plants, water treatment), and storage tanks and tankers for chemicals and food products.
The biological cleanability of stainless steel is superior to both aluminium and copper, having a biological cleanability comparable to glass. Its cleanability, strength, and corrosion resistance have prompted the use of stainless steel in pharmaceutical and food processing plants.
Different types of stainless steel are labeled with an AISI three-digit number, The ISO 15510 standard lists the chemical compositions of stainless steels of the specifications in existing ISO, ASTM, EN, JIS, and GB standards in a useful interchange table.
This section needs expansion with: information on physical properties other than magnetic and electric contact resistance. Missing is density, hardness, thermal conduction, etc.. You can help by adding to it. (August 2021)
Like steel, stainless steels are relatively poor conductors of electricity, with significantly lower electrical conductivities than copper. In particular, the electrical contact resistance (ECR) of stainless steel arises as a result of the dense protective oxide layer and limits its functionality in applications as electrical connectors. Copper alloys and nickel-coated connectors tend to exhibit lower ECR values, and are preferred materials for such applications. Nevertheless, stainless steel connectors are employed in situations where ECR poses a lower design criteria and corrosion resistance is required, for example in high temperatures and oxidizing environments.
As with all other alloys, the melting point of stainless steel is expressed in the form of a range of temperatures, and not a singular temperature. This temperature range goes from 1,400 to 1,530 °C (2,550 to 2,790 °F) depending on the specific consistency of the alloy in question.
Martensitic, duplex and ferritic stainless steels are magnetic, while austenitic stainless steel is usually non-magnetic. Ferritic steel owes its magnetism to its body-centered cubic crystal structure, in which iron atoms are arranged in cubes (with one iron atom at each corner) and an additional iron atom in the center. This central iron atom is responsible for ferritic steel's magnetic properties. This arrangement also limits the amount of carbon the steel can absorb to around 0.025%. Grades with low coercive field have been developed for electro-valves used in household appliances and for injection systems in internal combustion engines. Some applications require non-magnetic materials, such as magnetic resonance imaging. Austenitic stainless steels, which are usually non-magnetic, can be made slightly magnetic through work hardening. Sometimes, if austenitic steel is bent or cut, magnetism occurs along the edge of the stainless steel because the crystal structure rearranges itself.
|EN grade||Magnetic permeability, μ|
The addition of nitrogen also improves resistance to pitting corrosion and increases mechanical strength. Thus, there are numerous grades of stainless steel with varying chromium and molybdenum contents to suit the environment the alloy must endure. Corrosion resistance can be increased further by the following means:
- increasing chromium content to more than 11%
- adding nickel to at least 8%
- adding molybdenum (which also improves resistance to pitting corrosion)
Galling, sometimes called cold welding, is a form of severe adhesive wear, which can occur when two metal surfaces are in relative motion to each other and under heavy pressure. Austenitic stainless steel fasteners are particularly susceptible to thread galling, though other alloys that self-generate a protective oxide surface film, such as aluminium and titanium, are also susceptible. Under high contact-force sliding, this oxide can be deformed, broken, and removed from parts of the component, exposing the bare reactive metal. When the two surfaces are of the same material, these exposed surfaces can easily fuse. Separation of the two surfaces can result in surface tearing and even complete seizure of metal components or fasteners. Galling can be mitigated by the use of dissimilar materials (bronze against stainless steel) or using different stainless steels (martensitic against austenitic). Additionally, threaded joints may be lubricated to provide a film between the two parts and prevent galling. Nitronic 60, made by selective alloying with manganese, silicon, and nitrogen, has demonstrated a reduced tendency to gall.
The invention of stainless steel followed a series of scientific developments, starting in 1798 when chromium was first shown to the French Academy by Louis Vauquelin. In the early 1800s, British scientists James Stoddart, Michael Faraday, and Robert Mallet observed the resistance of chromium-iron alloys ("chromium steels") to oxidizing agents. Robert Bunsen discovered chromium's resistance to strong acids. The corrosion resistance of iron-chromium alloys may have been first recognized in 1821 by Pierre Berthier, who noted their resistance against attack by some acids and suggested their use in cutlery.
In the 1840s, both of Britain's Sheffield steelmakers and then Krupp of Germany were producing chromium steel with the latter employing it for cannons in the 1850s. In 1861, Robert Forester Mushet took out a patent on chromium steel in Britain.
These events led to the first American production of chromium-containing steel by J. Baur of the Chrome Steel Works of Brooklyn for the construction of bridges. A US patent for the product was issued in 1869.: 2261  This was followed with recognition of the corrosion resistance of chromium alloys by Englishmen John T. Woods and John Clark, who noted ranges of chromium from 5–30%, with added tungsten and "medium carbon". They pursued the commercial value of the innovation via a British patent for "Weather-Resistant Alloys".: 261, 11 [full citation needed]
In the late 1890s, German chemist Hans Goldschmidt developed an aluminothermic (thermite) process for producing carbon-free chromium. Between 1904 and 1911, several researchers, particularly Leon Guillet of France, prepared alloys that would be considered stainless steel today.
In 1908, the Essen firm Friedrich Krupp Germaniawerft built the 366-ton sailing yacht Germania featuring a chrome-nickel steel hull, in Germany. In 1911, Philip Monnartz reported on the relationship between chromium content and corrosion resistance. On 17 October 1912, Krupp engineers Benno Strauss and Eduard Maurer patented as Nirosta the austenitic stainless steel known today as 18/8 or AISI Type 304.
Similar developments were taking place in the United States, where Christian Dantsizen of General Electric and Frederick Becket (1875-1942) at Union Carbide were industrializing ferritic stainless steel. In 1912, Elwood Haynes applied for a US patent on a martensitic stainless steel alloy, which was not granted until 1919.
While seeking a corrosion-resistant alloy for gun barrels in 1912, Harry Brearley of the Brown-Firth research laboratory in Sheffield, England, discovered and subsequently industrialized a martensitic stainless steel alloy, today known as AISI Type 420. The discovery was announced two years later in a January 1915 newspaper article in The New York Times.
The metal was later marketed under the "Staybrite" brand by Firth Vickers in England and was used for the new entrance canopy for the Savoy Hotel in London in 1929. Brearley applied for a US patent during 1915 only to find that Haynes had already registered one. Brearley and Haynes pooled their funding and, with a group of investors, formed the American Stainless Steel Corporation, with headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.: 360
Brearley initially called his new alloy "rustless steel". The alloy was sold in the US under different brand names like "Allegheny metal" and "Nirosta steel". Even within the metallurgy industry, the name remained unsettled; in 1921, one trade journal called it "unstainable steel". Brearley worked with a local cutlery manufacturer, who gave it the name "stainless steel". As late as 1932, Ford Motor Company continued calling the alloy rustless steel in automobile promotional materials.
In 1929, before the Great Depression, over 25,000 tons of stainless steel were manufactured and sold in the US annually.
Major technological advances in the 1950s and 1960s allowed the production of large tonnages at an affordable cost:
There are five main families, which are primarily classified by their crystalline structure: austenitic, ferritic, martensitic, duplex, and precipitation hardening.
Austenitic stainless steel is the largest family of stainless steels, making up about two-thirds of all stainless steel production. They possess an austenitic microstructure, which is a face-centered cubic crystal structure. This microstructure is achieved by alloying steel with sufficient nickel and/or manganese and nitrogen to maintain an austenitic microstructure at all temperatures, ranging from the cryogenic region to the melting point. Thus, austenitic stainless steels are not hardenable by heat treatment since they possess the same microstructure at all temperatures.
Austenitic stainless steels sub-groups, 200 series and 300 series:
- 200 series are chromium-manganese-nickel alloys that maximize the use of manganese and nitrogen to minimize the use of nickel. Due to their nitrogen addition, they possess approximately 50% higher yield strength than 300 series stainless sheets of steel.
- Type 201 is hardenable through cold working.
- Type 202 is a general-purpose stainless steel. Decreasing nickel content and increasing manganese results in weak corrosion resistance.
- 300 series are chromium-nickel alloys that achieve their austenitic microstructure almost exclusively by nickel alloying; some very highly alloyed grades include some nitrogen to reduce nickel requirements. 300 series is the largest group and the most widely used.
- Type 304: The best-known grade is Type 304, also known as 18/8 and 18/10 for its composition of 18% chromium and 8% or 10% nickel, respectively.
- Type 316: The second most common austenitic stainless steel is Type 316. The addition of 2% molybdenum provides greater resistance to acids and localized corrosion caused by chloride ions. Low-carbon versions, such as 316L or 304L, have carbon contents below 0.03% and are used to avoid corrosion problems caused by welding.
Ferritic stainless steels possess a ferrite microstructure like carbon steel, which is a body-centered cubic crystal structure, and contain between 10.5% and 27% chromium with very little or no nickel. This microstructure is present at all temperatures due to the chromium addition, so they are not hardenable by heat treatment. They cannot be strengthened by cold work to the same degree as austenitic stainless steels. They are magnetic. Additions of niobium (Nb), titanium (Ti), and zirconium (Zr) to Type 430 allow good weldability. Due to the near-absence of nickel, they are less expensive than austenitic steels and are present in many products, which include:
- Automobile exhaust pipes (Type 409 and 409 Cb are used in North America; stabilized grades Type 439 and 441 are used in Europe)
- Architectural and structural applications (Type 430, which contains 17% Cr)
- Building components, such as slate hooks, roofing, and chimney ducts
- Power plates in solid oxide fuel cells operating at temperatures around 700 °C (1,292 °F) (high-chromium ferritics containing 22% Cr)
Martensitic stainless steels have a body-centered cubic crystal structure, and offer a wide range of properties and are used as stainless engineering steels, stainless tool steels, and creep-resistant steels. They are magnetic, and not as corrosion-resistant as ferritic and austenitic stainless steels due to their low chromium content. They fall into four categories (with some overlap):
- Fe-Cr-C grades. These were the first grades used and are still widely used in engineering and wear-resistant applications.
- Fe-Cr-Ni-C grades. Some carbon is replaced by nickel. They offer higher toughness and higher corrosion resistance. Grade EN 1.4303 (Casting grade CA6NM) with 13% Cr and 4% Ni is used for most Pelton, Kaplan, and Francis turbines in hydroelectric power plants because it has good casting properties, good weldability and good resistance to cavitation erosion.
- Precipitation hardening grades. Grade EN 1.4542 (also known as 17/4PH), the best-known grade, combines martensitic hardening and precipitation hardening. It achieves high strength and good toughness and is used in aerospace among other applications.
- Creep-resisting grades. Small additions of niobium, vanadium, boron, and cobalt increase the strength and creep resistance up to about 650 °C (1,202 °F).
Martensitic stainless steels can be heat treated to provide better mechanical properties. The heat treatment typically involves three steps:
- Austenitizing, in which the steel is heated to a temperature in the range 980–1,050 °C (1,800–1,920 °F), depending on grade. The resulting austenite has a face-centered cubic crystal structure.
- Quenching. The austenite is transformed into martensite, a hard body-centered tetragonal crystal structure. The quenched martensite is very hard and too brittle for most applications. Some residual austenite may remain.
- Tempering. Martensite is heated to around 500 °C (932 °F), held at temperature, then air-cooled. Higher tempering temperatures decrease yield strength and ultimate tensile strength but increase the elongation and impact resistance.
Replacing some carbon in martensitic stainless steels by nitrogen is a recent development.[when?] The limited solubility of nitrogen is increased by the pressure electroslag refining (PESR) process, in which melting is carried out under high nitrogen pressure. Steel containing up to 0.4% nitrogen has been achieved, leading to higher hardness and strength and higher corrosion resistance. As PESR is expensive, lower but significant nitrogen contents have been achieved using the standard AOD process.
Duplex stainless steels have a mixed microstructure of austenite and ferrite, the ideal ratio being a 50:50 mix, though commercial alloys may have ratios of 40:60. They are characterized by higher chromium (19–32%) and molybdenum (up to 5%) and lower nickel contents than austenitic stainless steels. Duplex stainless steels have roughly twice the yield strength of austenitic stainless steel. Their mixed microstructure provides improved resistance to chloride stress corrosion cracking in comparison to austenitic stainless steel Types 304 and 316. Duplex grades are usually divided into three sub-groups based on their corrosion resistance: lean duplex, standard duplex, and super duplex. The properties of duplex stainless steels are achieved with an overall lower alloy content than similar-performing super-austenitic grades, making their use cost-effective for many applications. The pulp and paper industry was one of the first to extensively use duplex stainless steel. Today, the oil and gas industry is the largest user and has pushed for more corrosion resistant grades, leading to the development of super duplex and hyper duplex grades. More recently, the less expensive (and slightly less corrosion-resistant) lean duplex has been developed, chiefly for structural applications in building and construction (concrete reinforcing bars, plates for bridges, coastal works) and in the water industry.
Precipitation hardening stainless steels have corrosion resistance comparable to austenitic varieties, but can be precipitation hardened to even higher strengths than other martensitic grades. There are three types of precipitation hardening stainless steels:
- Martensitic 17-4 PH (AISI 630 EN 1.4542) contains about 17% Cr, 4% Ni, 4% Cu, and 0.3% Nb.
Solution treatment at about 1,040 °C (1,900 °F)followed by quenching results in a relatively ductile martensitic structure. Subsequent aging treatment at 475 °C (887 °F) precipitates Nb and Cu-rich phases that increase the strength up to above 1000 MPa yield strength. This outstanding strength level is used in high-tech applications such as aerospace (usually after remelting to eliminate non-metallic inclusions, which increases fatigue life). Another major advantage of this steel is that aging, unlike tempering treatments, is carried out at a temperature that can be applied to (nearly) finished parts without distortion and discoloration.
- Semi-austenitic 17-7PH (AISI 631 EN 1.4568) contains about 17% Cr, 7.2% Ni, and 1.2% Al.
Typical heat treatment involves solution treatment and Quenching. At this point, the structure remains austenitic. Martensitic transformation is then obtained either by a cryogenic treatment at −75 °C (−103 °F) or by severe cold work (over 70% deformation, usually by cold rolling or wire drawing). Aging at 510 °C (950 °F)—which precipitates the Ni3Al intermetallic phase—is carried out as above on nearly finished parts. Yield stress levels above 1400 MPa are then reached.
- Austenitic A286(ASTM 660 EN 1.4980) contains about Cr 15%, Ni 25%, Ti 2.1%, Mo 1.2%, V 1.3%, and B 0.005%.
The structure remains austenitic at all temperatures.
Typical heat treatment involves solution treatment and quenching, followed by aging at 715 °C (1,319 °F). Aging forms Ni3Ti precipitates and increases the yield strength to about 650 MPa at room temperature. Unlike the above grades, the mechanical properties and creep resistance of this steel remain very good at temperatures up to 700 °C (1,292 °F). As a result, A286 is classified as an Fe-based superalloy, used in jet engines, gas turbines, and turbo parts.
There are over 150 grades of stainless steel, of which 15 are most commonly used. There are several systems for grading stainless and other steels, including US SAE steel grades. The Unified Numbering System for Metals and Alloys (UNS) was developed by the ASTM in 1970. The Europeans have developed EN 10088 for the same purpose.
In its early history, stainless steel was sometimes called rustless steel. Both adjectives, stainless and rustless, are duly recognized and accepted as exaggerations: stainless steel is not literally incapable of rusting, but its established name is "stainless steel" nonetheless.
In technical datasets, stainless steel may sometimes be designated as inox (inoxidizable), CRES (corrosion-resistant), or SS or SST (stainless steel). It may also be designated by subclass or grade without further specification, as for example 18–8, 17-4 PH, 316, 303, or 304.
Unlike carbon steel, stainless steels do not suffer uniform corrosion when exposed to wet environments. Unprotected carbon steel rusts readily when exposed to a combination of air and moisture. The resulting iron oxide surface layer is porous and fragile. In addition, as iron oxide occupies a larger volume than the original steel, this layer expands and tends to flake and fall away, exposing the underlying steel to further attack. In comparison, stainless steels contain sufficient chromium to undergo passivation, spontaneously forming a microscopically thin inert surface film of chromium oxide by reaction with the oxygen in the air and even the small amount of dissolved oxygen in the water. This passive film prevents further corrosion by blocking oxygen diffusion to the steel surface and thus prevents corrosion from spreading into the bulk of the metal. This film is self-repairing, even when scratched or temporarily disturbed by an upset condition in the environment that exceeds the inherent corrosion resistance of that grade.
The resistance of this film to corrosion depends upon the chemical composition of the stainless steel, chiefly the chromium content. It is customary to distinguish between four forms of corrosion: uniform, localized (pitting), galvanic, and SCC (stress corrosion cracking). Any of these forms of corrosion can occur when the grade of stainless steel is not suited for the working environment.
The designation "CRES" refers to corrosion-resistant steel.
Uniform corrosion takes place in very aggressive environments, typically where chemicals are produced or heavily used, such as in the pulp and paper industries. The entire surface of the steel is attacked, and the corrosion is expressed as corrosion rate in mm/year (usually less than 0.1 mm/year is acceptable for such cases). Corrosion tables provide guidelines.
This is typically the case when stainless steels are exposed to acidic or basic solutions. Whether stainless steel corrodes depends on the kind and concentration of acid or base and the solution temperature. Uniform corrosion is typically easy to avoid because of extensive published corrosion data or easily performed laboratory corrosion testing.
Acidic solutions can be put into two general categories: reducing acids, such as hydrochloric acid and dilute sulfuric acid, and oxidizing acids, such as nitric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid. Increasing chromium and molybdenum content provides increased resistance to reducing acids while increasing chromium and silicon content provides increased resistance to oxidizing acids. Sulfuric acid is one of the most-produced industrial chemicals. At room temperature, Type 304 stainless steel is only resistant to 3% acid, while Type 316 is resistant to 3% acid up to 50 °C (122 °F) and 20% acid at room temperature. Thus Type 304 SS is rarely used in contact with sulfuric acid. Type 904L and Alloy 20 are resistant to sulfuric acid at even higher concentrations above room temperature. Concentrated sulfuric acid possesses oxidizing characteristics like nitric acid, and thus silicon-bearing stainless steels are also useful. Hydrochloric acid damages any kind of stainless steel and should be avoided.: 118  All types of stainless steel resist attack from phosphoric acid and nitric acid at room temperature. At high concentrations and elevated temperatures, attack will occur, and higher-alloy stainless steels are required. In general, organic acids are less corrosive than mineral acids such as hydrochloric and sulfuric acid. As the molecular weight of organic acids increases, their corrosivity decreases. Formic acid has the lowest molecular weight and is a weak acid. Type 304 can be used with formic acid, though it tends to discolor the solution. Type 316 is commonly used for storing and handling acetic acid, a commercially important organic acid.
Type 304 and Type 316 stainless steels are unaffected by weak bases such as ammonium hydroxide, even in high concentrations and at high temperatures. The same grades exposed to stronger bases such as sodium hydroxide at high concentrations and high temperatures will likely experience some etching and cracking. Increasing chromium and nickel contents provide increased resistance.
All grades resist damage from aldehydes and amines, though in the latter case Type 316 is preferable to Type 304; cellulose acetate damages Type 304 unless the temperature is kept low. Fats and fatty acids only affect Type 304 at temperatures above 150 °C (302 °F) and Type 316 SS above 260 °C (500 °F), while Type 317 SS is unaffected at all temperatures. Type 316L is required for the processing of urea.[page needed]
Localized corrosion can occur in several ways, e.g. pitting corrosion and crevice corrosion. These localized attacks are most common in the presence of chloride ions. Higher chloride levels require more highly alloyed stainless steels.
Localized corrosion can be difficult to predict because it is dependent on many factors, including:
- Chloride ion concentration. Even when chloride solution concentration is known, it is still possible for localized corrosion to occur unexpectedly. Chloride ions can become unevenly concentrated in certain areas, such as in crevices (e.g. under gaskets) or on surfaces in vapor spaces due to evaporation and condensation.
- Temperature: increasing temperature increases susceptibility.
- Acidity: increasing acidity increases susceptibility.
- Stagnation: stagnant conditions increase susceptibility.
- Oxidizing species: the presence of oxidizing species, such as ferric and cupric ions, increases susceptibility.
Pitting corrosion is considered the most common form of localized corrosion. The corrosion resistance of stainless steels to pitting corrosion is often expressed by the PREN, obtained through the formula:
where the terms correspond to the proportion of the contents by mass of chromium, molybdenum, and nitrogen in the steel. For example, if the steel consisted of 15% chromium %Cr would be equal to 15.
The higher the PREN, the higher the pitting corrosion resistance. Thus, increasing chromium, molybdenum, and nitrogen contents provide better resistance to pitting corrosion.
Though the PREN of certain steel may be theoretically sufficient to resist pitting corrosion, crevice corrosion can still occur when the poor design has created confined areas (overlapping plates, washer-plate interfaces, etc.) or when deposits form on the material. In these select areas, the PREN may not be high enough for the service conditions. Good design, fabrication techniques, alloy selection, proper operating conditions based on the concentration of active compounds present in the solution causing corrosion, pH, etc. can prevent such corrosion.
Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is a sudden cracking and failure of a component without deformation. It may occur when three conditions are met:
- The part is stressed (by an applied load or by residual stress).
- The environment is aggressive (high chloride level, temperature above 50 °C (122 °F), presence of H2S).
- The stainless steel is not sufficiently SCC-resistant.
The SCC mechanism results from the following sequence of events:
- Pitting occurs.
- Cracks start from a pit initiation site.
- Cracks then propagate through the metal in a transgranular or intergranular mode.
- Failure occurs.
Whereas pitting usually leads to unsightly surfaces and, at worst, to perforation of the stainless sheet, failure by SCC can have severe consequences. It is therefore considered as a special form of corrosion.
As SCC requires several conditions to be met, it can be counteracted with relatively easy measures, including:
- Reducing the stress level (the oil and gas specifications provide requirements for maximal stress level in H2S-containing environments).
- Assessing the aggressiveness of the environment (high chloride content, temperature above 50 °C (122 °F), etc.).
- Selecting the right type of stainless steel: super austenitic such as grade 904L or super-duplex (ferritic stainless steels and duplex stainless steels are very resistant to SCC).
Galvanic corrosion (also called "dissimilar-metal corrosion") refers to corrosion damage induced when two dissimilar materials are coupled in a corrosive electrolyte. The most common electrolyte is water, ranging from freshwater to seawater. When a galvanic couple forms, one of the metals in the couple becomes the anode and corrodes faster than it would alone, while the other becomes the cathode and corrodes slower than it would alone. Stainless steel, due to having a more positive electrode potential than for example carbon steel and aluminium, becomes the cathode, accelerating the corrosion of the anodic metal. An example is the corrosion of aluminium rivets fastening stainless steel sheets in contact with water. The relative surface areas of the anode and the cathode are important in determining the rate of corrosion. In the above example, the surface area of the rivets is small compared to that of the stainless steel sheet, resulting in rapid corrosion. However, if stainless steel fasteners are used to assemble aluminium sheets, galvanic corrosion will be much slower because the galvanic current density on the aluminium surface will be many orders of magnitude smaller. A frequent mistake is to assemble stainless steel plates with carbon steel fasteners; whereas using stainless steel to fasten carbon-steel plates is usually acceptable, the reverse is not. Providing electrical insulation between the dissimilar metals, where possible, are effective at preventing this type of corrosion.
At elevated temperatures, all metals react with hot gases. The most common high-temperature gaseous mixture is air, of which oxygen is the most reactive component. To avoid corrosion in air, carbon steel is limited to approximately 480 °C (900 °F). Oxidation resistance in stainless steels increases with additions of chromium, silicon, and aluminium. Small additions of cerium and yttrium increase the adhesion of the oxide layer on the surface. The addition of chromium remains the most common method to increase high-temperature corrosion resistance in stainless steels; chromium reacts with oxygen to form a chromium oxide scale, which reduces oxygen diffusion into the material. The minimum 10.5% chromium in stainless steels provides resistance to approximately 700 °C (1,300 °F), while 16% chromium provides resistance up to approximately 1,200 °C (2,200 °F). Type 304, the most common grade of stainless steel with 18% chromium, is resistant to approximately 870 °C (1,600 °F). Other gases, such as sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide, chlorine, also attack stainless steel. Resistance to other gases is dependent on the type of gas, the temperature, and the alloying content of the stainless steel. With the addition of up to 5% aluminium, ferritic grades Fr-Cr-Al are designed for electrical resistance and oxidation resistance at elevated temperatures. Such alloys include Kanthal, produced in the form of wire or ribbons.
Standard mill finishes can be applied to flat rolled stainless steel directly by the rollers and by mechanical abrasives. Steel is first rolled to size and thickness and then annealed to change the properties of the final material. Any oxidation that forms on the surface (mill scale) is removed by pickling, and a passivation layer is created on the surface. A final finish can then be applied to achieve the desired aesthetic appearance.
- No. 0: Hot-rolled, annealed, thicker plates
- No. 1 (1D): Hot-rolled, annealed and passivated
- No. 2D (2D): Cold rolled, annealed, pickled and passivated
- No. 2B (2B): Same as above with additional pass through highly polished rollers
- No. 2BA (2R): Bright annealed (BA or 2R) same as above then bright annealed under oxygen-free atmospheric condition
- No. 3 (G-2G:) Coarse abrasive finish applied mechanically
- No. 4 (1J-2J): Brushed finish
- No. 5: Satin finish
- No. 6 (1K-2K): Matte finish (brushed but smoother than #4)
- No. 7 (1P-2P): Reflective finish
- No. 8: Mirror finish
- No. 9: Bead blast finish
- No. 10: Heat colored finish – offering a wide range of electropolished and heat colored surfaces
The ease of welding largely depends on the type of stainless steel used. Austenitic stainless steels are the easiest to weld by electric arc, with weld properties similar to those of the base metal (not cold-worked). Martensitic stainless steels can also be welded by electric-arc but, as the heat-affected zone (HAZ) and the fusion zone (FZ) form martensite upon cooling, precautions must be taken to avoid cracking of the weld. Improper welding practices can additionally cause sugaring (oxide scaling) and/or heat tint on the backside of the weld. This can be prevented with the use of back-purging gases, backing plates, and fluxes. Post-weld heat treatment is almost always required while preheating before welding is also necessary in some cases. Electric arc welding of Type 430 ferritic stainless steel results in grain growth in the HAZ, which leads to brittleness. This has largely been overcome with stabilized ferritic grades, where niobium, titanium, and zirconium form precipitates that prevent grain growth. Duplex stainless steel welding by electric arc is a common practice but requires careful control of the process parameters. Otherwise, the precipitation of unwanted intermetallic phases occurs, which reduces the toughness of the welds.
Electric arc welding processes include:
- Gas metal arc welding, also known as MIG/MAG welding
- Gas tungsten arc welding, also known as tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding
- Plasma arc welding
- Flux-cored arc welding
- Shielded metal arc welding (covered electrode)
- Submerged arc welding
MIG, MAG and TIG welding are the most common methods.
Other welding processes include:
- Stud welding
- Resistance spot welding
- Resistance seam welding
- Flash welding
- Laser beam welding
- Oxy-acetylene welding
This section needs additional citations for verification. (March 2020)
Most of the world's stainless steel production is produced by the following processes:
- Electric arc furnace (EAF): stainless steel scrap, other ferrous scrap, and ferrous alloys (Fe Cr, Fe Ni, Fe Mo, Fe Si) are melted together. The molten metal is then poured into a ladle and transferred into the AOD process (see below).
- Argon oxygen decarburization (AOD): carbon in the molten steel is removed (by turning it into carbon monoxide gas) and other compositional adjustments are made to achieve the desired chemical composition.
- Continuous casting (CC): the molten metal is solidified into slabs for flat products (a typical section is 20 centimetres (8 in) thick and 2 metres (6.6 ft) wide) or blooms (sections vary widely but 25 by 25 centimetres (9.8 in × 9.8 in) is the average size).
- Hot rolling (HR): slabs and blooms are reheated in a furnace and hot-rolled. Hot rolling reduces the thickness of the slabs to produce about 3 mm (0.12 in)-thick coils. Blooms, on the other hand, are hot-rolled into bars, which are cut into lengths at the exit of the rolling mill, or wire rod, which is coiled.
- Cold finishing (CF) depends on the type of product being finished:
- Hot-rolled coils are pickled in acid solutions to remove the oxide scale on the surface, then subsequently cold rolled in Sendzimir rolling mills and annealed in a protective atmosphere until the desired thickness and surface finish is obtained. Further operations such as slitting and tube forming can be performed in downstream facilities.
- Hot-rolled bars are straightened, then machined to the required tolerance and finish.
- Wire rod coils are subsequently processed to produce cold-finished bars on drawing benches, fasteners on boltmaking machines, and wire on single or multipass drawing machines.
World stainless steel production figures are published yearly by the International Stainless Steel Forum. Of the EU production figures, Italy, Belgium and Spain were notable, while Canada and Mexico produced none. China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India the US and Indonesia were large producers while Russia reported little production.
Breakdown of production by stainless steels families in 2017:
- Austenitic stainless steels Cr-Ni (also called 300-series, see "Grades" section above): 54%
- Austenitic stainless steels Cr-Mn (also called 200-series): 21%
- Ferritic and martensitic stainless steels (also called 400-series): 23%
Stainless steel is used in a multitude of fields including architecture, art, chemical engineering, food and beverage manufacture, vehicles, medicine, energy and firearms.
Life cycle costEdit
where LCC is the overall life cycle cost, AC is the acquisition cost, IC the installation cost, OC the operating and maintenance costs, LP the cost of lost production due to downtime, and RC the replacement materials cost.
In addition, N is the planned life of the project, i the interest rate, and n the year in which a particular OC or LP or RC is taking place. The interest rate (i) is used to convert expenses from different years to their present value (a method widely used by banks and insurance companies) so they can be added and compared fairly. The usage of the sum formula ( ) captures the fact that expenses over the lifetime of a project must be cumulated[clarification needed] after they are corrected for interest rate.
Application of LCC in materials selection
Stainless steel used in projects often results in lower LCC values compared to other materials. The higher acquisition cost (AC) of stainless steel components are often offset by improvements in operating and maintenance costs, reduced loss of production (LP) costs, and the higher resale value of stainless steel components.
LCC calculations are usually limited to the project itself. However, there may be other costs that a project stakeholder may wish to consider:
- Utilities, such as power plants, water supply & wastewater treatment, and hospitals, cannot be shut down. Any maintenance will require extra costs associated with continuing service.
- Indirect societal costs (with possible political fallout) may be incurred in some situations such as closing or reducing traffic on bridges, creating queues, delays, loss of working hours to the people, and increased pollution by idling vehicles.
Sustainability–recycling and reuseEdit
The average carbon footprint of stainless steel (all grades, all countries) is estimated to be 2.90 kg of CO2 per kg of stainless steel produced, of which 1.92 kg are emissions from raw materials (Cr, Ni, Mo); 0.54 kg from electricity and steam, and 0.44 kg are direct emissions (i.e., by the stainless steel plant). Note that stainless steel produced in countries that use cleaner sources of electricity (such as France, which uses nuclear energy) will have a lower carbon footprint. Ferritics without Ni will have a lower CO2 footprint than austenitics with 8% Ni or more. Carbon footprint must not be the only sustainability-related factor for deciding the choice of materials:
- Over any product life, maintenance, repairs or early end of life (planned obsolescence) can increase its overall footprint far beyond initial material differences. In addition, loss of service (typically for bridges) may induce large hidden costs, such as queues, wasted fuel, and loss of man-hours.
- How much material is used to provide a given service varies with the performance, particularly the strength level, which allows lighter structures and components.
Stainless steel is 100% recyclable. An average stainless steel object is composed of about 60% recycled material of which approximately 40% originates from end-of-life products, while the remaining 60% comes from manufacturing processes. What prevents a higher recycling content is the availability of stainless steel scrap, in spite of a very high recycling rate. According to the International Resource Panel's Metal Stocks in Society report, the per capita stock of stainless steel in use in society is 80–180 kg in more developed countries and 15 kg in less-developed countries. There is a secondary market that recycles usable scrap for many stainless steel markets. The product is mostly coil, sheet, and blanks. This material is purchased at a less-than-prime price and sold to commercial quality stampers and sheet metal houses. The material may have scratches, pits, and dents but is made to the current specifications.
The stainless steel cycle starts with carbon steel scrap, primary metals, and slag. The next step is the production of hot-rolled and cold-finished steel products in steel mills. Some scrap is produced, which is directly reused in the melting shop. The manufacturing of components is the third step. Some scrap is produced and enters the recycling loop. Assembly of final goods and their use does not generate any material loss. The fourth step is the collection of stainless steel for recycling at the end of life of the goods (such as kitchenware, pulp and paper plants, or automotive parts). This is where it is most difficult to get stainless steel to enter the recycling loop, as shown in the table below:
|End-use sector||Results||Use, global average||Estimates|
|To landfill||Collected for recycling|
|Total||Of which as stainless steel||Of which as carbon steel|
|Building and infrastructure||17%||18%||50||30%||8%||92%||95%||5%|
|Of which passenger cars||17%||14%||14||15%|
|Of which others||4%||4%||30||20%|
|Household appliances & electronics||10%||10%||15||20%||30%||70%||95%||5%|
Nanoscale stainless steelEdit
Stainless steel nanoparticles have been produced in the laboratory. These may have applications as additives for high-performance applications. For example, sulfurization, phosphorization, and nitridation treatments to produce nanoscale stainless steel based catalysts could enhance the electrocatalytic performance of stainless steel for water splitting.
There is extensive research indicating some probable increased risk of cancer (particularly lung cancer) from inhaling fumes while welding stainless steel. Stainless steel welding is suspected of producing carcinogenic fumes from cadmium oxides, nickel, and chromium. According to Cancer Council Australia, "In 2017, all types of welding fumes were classified as a Group 1 carcinogen."
Stainless steel is generally considered to be biologically inert. However, during cooking, small amounts of nickel and chromium leach out of new stainless steel cookware into highly acidic food. Nickel can contribute to cancer risks—particularly lung cancer and nasal cancer. However, no connection between stainless steel cookware and cancer has been established.
- Davis, Joseph R., ed. (1994). Stainless Steels. ASM Specialty Handbook. Materials Park, OH: ASM International. ISBN 9780871705037. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- Boulané-Petermann, L. (1996). "Processes of bioadhesion on stainless steel surfaces and cleanability: A review with special reference to the food industry". Biofouling. 10 (4): 275–300. doi:10.1080/08927019609386287. ISSN 0892-7014. PMID 22115182. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- Zaffora, Andrea; Di Franco, Francesco; Santamaria, Monica (October 2021). "Corrosion of stainless steel in food and pharmaceutical industry". Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 29: Article 100760. doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100760. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- ASM International (2000). "Introduction to Stainless Steels". Alloy Digest Sourcebook: Stainless Steels. Archived from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- International Organization for Standardization (May 2014). "ISO 15510:2014 Stainless steels — Chemical composition". Archived from the original on 2 June 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Electrical contact resistance between stainless steel bipolar plate and carbon felt in PEFC: A comprehensive study International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- LaCrO3-based coatings on ferritic stainless steel for solid oxide fuel cell interconnect applications Archived 14 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine in Surface and Coatings Technology Volumes 177–178, 30 January 2004, Pages 65-72
- "What is the melting point of stainless steel?". Langley Alloys. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
- "What Is the Stainless Steel Melting Point?". Kloeckner Metals Corporation. 29 November 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
- "Atlas Tech Note: qualitative sorting tests for steels" (PDF). Atlas Steels. October 2008. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
- "What Is The Difference Between Ferritic, Austenitic & Martensitic Stainless Steels? | Accu - Accu". Accu.co.uk. Retrieved 24 August 2022.
- "Why don't magnets work on some stainless steels?". Scientific American. Retrieved 22 July 2022.
- Fofanov, D.; Riedner, S. (29 November 2011). "Magnetic properties of Stainless Steels: applications, opportunities and new developments". Stainless steel World Conference.
- International Stainless Steel Forum (8 March 2020). "The Stainless Steel Family" (PDF). Brussels, Belgium. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 March 2016. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- International Stainless Steel Forum (21 September 2018). "Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
- Committee of Stainless Steel Producers. American Iron and Steel Institute (1978). "Review of the Wear and Galling Characteristics of Stainless Steels". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- British Stainless Steel Association (2001). "Galling and Galling Resistance of Stainless Steels". SSAS Information Sheet No. 5.60. Archived from the original on 24 July 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "A non-rusting steel". New York Times. 31 January 1915.
- Cobb, Harold M. (2010). The History of Stainless Steel. ISBN 9781615030118. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Quentin r. Skrabec, Jr (24 January 2015). The Metallurgic Age: The Victorian Flowering of Invention and Industrial Science. ISBN 9781476611136. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Waldo, Leonard (October 1916). "Chrome-Nickel Iron and Steel Products". Iron Age. Vol. 98. New York City: David Williams Co. pp. 838–839. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021 – via Haithi Trust.
- Cobb, Harold M. (2010). The History of Stainless Steel. Materials Park, OH: ASM International. ISBN 9781615030118. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- Despite the evidence of the use of Baur's "chrome steel" in bridgeworks, others[who?] have argued that metallurgists of the 19th century were unable to produce anything but high-chromium alloys that were "too brittle to be practical".[according to whom?]
- "It's Complicated: The Discovery of Stainless Steel". Airedale Springs. September 2015. Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.[full citation needed][verification needed]
- "The Discovery of Stainless Steel". British Stainless Steel Association. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012.
- Chezeau, N. (1997). "Léon Alexandre Guillet (1873-1946)". Revue de Métallurgie. 94 (5): 592–596. doi:10.1051/metal/199794050592.
- "Handbook of Stainless Steel". Outokumpu Oyj. 2013. p. 12.
- "ThyssenKrupp Nirosta: History". Archived from the original on 2 September 2007. Retrieved 13 August 2007.
- "DEPATISnet-Dokument DE000000304126A". Archived from the original on 13 August 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "DEPATISnet-Dokument DE000000304159A". Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Cobb, Harold M. (September 2007). "The Naming and Numbering of Stainless Steels". Advanced Materials & Processes. ASM International. 165 (9). Archived from the original on 27 June 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Frederick Mark Becket American metallurgist". Encyclopaedia Britannica. 7 January 2021. Archived from the original on 7 June 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Carlisle, Rodney P. (2004) Scientific American Inventions and Discoveries Archived 13 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine, p. 380, John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0-471-24410-4.
- Howse, Geoffrey (2011) A Photographic History of Sheffield Steel, History Press, ISBN 0752459856.
- Moneypenny, J. H. G. (2 April 1921). "Unstainable Steel". Mining and Scientific Press. p. 442,463. Retrieved 17 February 2013.
- "The development of stainless steel". Stainless Steel Club. Seoul, Korea: Korea Iron & Steel Association. Archived from the original on 27 August 2005. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
- "1932—The Invention of the Ford V8 Engine". YouTube. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
- "New Steel Alloy is Rustproof". Popular Science. Bonnier Corporation. December 1930. pp. 31–. ISSN 0161-7370. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Lenard, John G. (2014). Primer on flat rolling. ISBN 978-0-08-099418-5.
- "Sendzimir | Company Info | Company History". Archived from the original on 15 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Ikeda, Satoshi (2010). "Technical Progress of Stainless Steel and its future trend" (PDF). Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- India: National Institute of Industrial Research (2017). The Complete Technology Book on Hot Rolling of Steel. Delhi, India: Asia Pacific. p. 324. ISBN 9788190568586.
- Stainless steels for design engineers (#05231G). ASM International. 2008. pp. 69–78 (Chapter 6). ISBN 978-0-87170-717-8. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- McGuire, Michael F. (2008). Practical Guidelines for the Fabrication of High Performance Austenitic Stainless Steels. ISBN 978-0-87170-717-8. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- International Stainless Steel Forum. "Stainless Steel in Figures 2021" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Microstructures in Austenitic Stainless Steels :: Total Materia Article". www.totalmateria.com. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 23 June 2020.
- Bristish Stainless Steel Association (August 2006). "200 Series Stainless Steels. An overview". Stainless Steel Industry. Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Data sheet on 201 Stainless Steel Alloy". Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Welding of stainless steels and other joining methods" (PDF). Nickel Institute. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Santacreu, P-O; Faivre, L.; Acher, A.; Leseux, J. (2011). K4X: A new ferritic stainless steel grade with improved durability for high temperature exhaust manifolds. Proceedings of 7th European Stainless Steel Science & Market (Como, Italy) Paper 25.
- Cashell, K. A.; Baddoo, N.R. (2014). "Ferritic stainless steels in structural applications". Thin-walled Structures. Elsevier B.V. 83: 169–181. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2014.03.014. Archived from the original on 24 November 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Shaigan, Nima; Qu, Wei; Ivey, Douglas; Chen, Weixing (2010). "A review of recent progress in coatings, surface modifications and alloy developments for solid oxide fuel cell ferritic stainless steel interconnects". Journal of Power Sources. Elsevier B.V. 195 (6): 1529–1542. Bibcode:2010JPS...195.1529S. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.069.
- "Martensitic Stainless Steels". worldstainless.org/. 21 November 2017. Archived from the original on 9 July 2018. Retrieved 28 January 2019.
- "Stainless teel in Micro Hydro turbines". International Stainless Steel Forum. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019.
- Dossett, J; Totten, GE, eds. (2014). ASM Handbook Vol 4D Heat treating of irons and steels. ASM International. pp. 382–396. doi:10.31399/asm.hb.v04d.a0005985. Archived from the original on 23 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Leda H. (1995). "Nitrogen in Martensitic stainless steels". Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 55 (1–2): 263–272. doi:10.1016/0924-0136(95)01984-M.
- Hamano S.; Shimizu T.; Noda Toshiharu (2007). "Properties of Low Carbon High Nitrogen Martensitic Stainless Steels". Materials Science Forum. 539–543: 4975–4980. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.4975. S2CID 136518814.
- Horowitz M.B.; Neto F.B.; Garbogini A.; Tschiptschin A.P. (1996). "Nitrogen-Bearing Martensitic Stainless Steels". ISIJ International. 36 (7): 840–845. doi:10.2355/isijinternational.36.840.
- Krasokha N., Berns H. (2011). "Study on nitrogen in martensitic stainless steels". HTM Journal of Heat Treatment and Materials. 66 (3): 150–164. Bibcode:2011HJHTM..66..150K. doi:10.3139/105.110099. S2CID 138622727.
- Gorodin D.; Manes L.; Monicault J-M (2002). "Characterization of the XD15N High Nitrogen Martensitic Stainless Steel for Aerospace Bearing". 4th International Conference on Launcher Technology "Space Launcher Liquid Propulsion, Liège, Belgium – via Centre National Etudes Spatiales.
- De Cooman, Bruno Charles (April 2016). Lecture on stainless steel_9. Pohang University of Science and Technology Korea Graduate Institute of Ferrous Technology. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1950.2488.
- "A-286 - Rolled Alloys, Inc". www.rolledalloys.com. Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- acom 2-2006 Passive Films on Stainless Steel – Recent Nano-Range Research, Claes-Olsson, Outokumpu, Avesta Research Center.
- "Chapter 5 corrosion resistance of stainless steels". www.worldstainless.org. Archived from the original on 12 September 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Specialty Steel Industry of North America (SSINA), Frequently asked questions, archived from the original on 25 December 2019, retrieved 6 April 2017.
- Sandvik. "Corrosion Tables". Archived from the original on 13 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- International Nickel Company (1983). "The Corrosion Resistance of Nickel-Containing Alloys in Sulphuric Acid and Related Compounds". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 8 January 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Schillmoller, C.M. (1990). "Selection and Performance of Stainless Steel and other Nickel-Bearing Alloys in Sulphuric Acid". NiDI Technical Series No. 10 057. Toronto, CA: Nickel Development Institute. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 9 March 2020.
- Davies, Michael (2018). Moe, Geir (ed.). "Alloy Selection for Service in Chlorine, Hydrogen Chloride and Hydrochloric Acid: A Guide to the Use of Nickel-Containing Alloys" (2nd ed.). Toronto, CA: Nickel Development Institute. pp. 8–10. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- International Nickel Company. "Corrosion Resistance of Nickel-Containing Alloys in Phosphoric Acid". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- C. M. Schillmoller. "Selection and Use of Stainless Steel and Ni Bearing Alloys in Nitric Acid". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- C. M. Schillmoller (1992). "Selection and Use of Stainless Steel and Nickel-Bearing Alloys in Organic Acids". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 8 January 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- C. M. Schillmoller (1988). "Alloy Selection for Caustic Soda Service". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 8 January 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Material Selection and Use in Water". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- A Euro Inox publication (2009). "Stainless steels in contact with other materials" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Bauer, Alfred E. "Stainless Steels in Waters; Galvanic Corrosion and its Prevention". Nickel Institute. pp. 7–9. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Oxidation resistance of stainless steels". British Stainless Steel Association. Archived from the original on 7 August 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- American Iron and Steel Institute (April 1979). "High Temperature Characteristics of Stainless Steel". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 7 March 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Elliott, Peter (August 1990). "Practical Guide to High Temperature Alloys". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 7 March 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- The ferritic solution Properties/advantages/applications. April 2017. ISBN 978-2-930069-51-7. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
- "ASTM A480/A480M-18 Standard Specification for General Requirements for Flat-Rolled Stainless and Heat-Resisting Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip". ASTM International. 21 December 2018. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
- Cochrane, David; Helzel, Martina (2005). Guide to Stainless Steel Finishes 3rd Ed (PDF). Brussels. Belgium: Euro Inox. pp. 4–23. ISBN 287997173X.
- Velling, Andreas (13 September 2019). "Stainless Steel Finishes Explained – DIN & ASTM". Retrieved 30 November 2021.
- Pierre-Jean, Cunat (2007). The Welding of Stainless Steels. ISBN 978-2-87997-180-3. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Ultimate Guide - Stainless Steel - Fabrication, Grinding, and Finishing with Abrasives". Empire Abrasives. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
- Gordon, Wayne; van Bennekom, A. (1996). "Review of stabilization of ferritic stainless steels". Materials Science and Technology. 12 (2): 126–131. doi:10.1179/mst.1918.104.22.168.
- Singh, Ramesh (2012). "Chapter 6 - Welding corrosion resistant Alloys - Stainless Steel". Applied Welding Engineering: 191–214. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-391916-8.00018-2. ISBN 9780123919168.
- "Duplex stainless steel welding guidelines" (PDF). Industeel ArcelorMittal. 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 January 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Kosmac, Alenka (2013). Adhesive Bonding of Stainless Steels. pp. 11–13. ISBN 978-2-87997-388-3. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Life cycle Costing". World Stainless ( www.worldstainless.org ). Archived from the original on 17 September 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Fuller, Sieglinde (2016). "Life Cycle Cost Analysis". WBDG (Whole Building Design Guide). Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Al-Wazeer, Adel; Harris, Bobby; Nutakor, Christopher (2005). Federal Highway Administration (USA) (ed.). "Applying LCCA to Bridges". Publication FHWA-HRT-06-001 Vol. 69 No. 3, Nov-Dec 2005. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "ISO 15686-5 Standard: Buildings and constructed assets. Service life planning. Life cycle costing". 2008. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- International Stainless Steel Forum (2015). "Stainless Steel and CO2: Facts and scientific observations". Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- Johnson, J.; Reck, B.K.; Wang, T.; Graede, T.E. (2008), "The energy benefit of stainless steel recycling", Energy Policy, 36: 181–192, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.028
- "Recycling Stainless Steel". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Recycling of Nickel-containing Alloys". Nickel Institute. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "The Recycling of Stainless Steel ("Recycled Content" and "Input Composition" slides)". International Stainless Steel Forum. 2006. Archived from the original (Flash) on 27 January 2011. Retrieved 19 November 2006.
- Reck, Barbara; Chambon, Martine; Hashimoto, Seiji; Graedel, T.E. (2010). "Global Stainless Steel Cycle exemplifies China's rise to metal dominance". Environmental Science & Technology. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 10. 44 (10): 3940–3946. Bibcode:2010EnST...44.3940R. doi:10.1021/es903584q. PMID 20426460.
- Wu, Wenjie; Maye, Mathew M. (1 January 2014). "Void Coalescence in Core/Alloy Nanoparticles with Stainless Interfaces". Small. 10 (2): 271–276. doi:10.1002/smll.201301420. PMID 23881842.
- US patent 10695831, Maye, Mathew M. & Wu, Wenjie, "Method to control void formation in nanomaterials using core/alloy nanoparticles with stainless interfaces" Archived 21 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine
- Liu, Xuan (2017). "Facile Surface Modification of Ubiquitous Stainless Steel Led to Competent Electrocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting". ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 5 (6): 4778–4784. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00182.
- Langård, S. and R.M. Stern, "Nickel in welding fumes--a cancer hazard to welders? A review of epidemiological studies on cancer in welders," 1984, IARC Scientific Publications 1984;(53):95-103, summarized on website of National Institutes of Health, retrieved 16 March 2020
- Langård, S (1994). "Nickel-related cancer in welders". Sci Total Environ. 148 (2–3): 303–9. Bibcode:1994ScTEn.148..303L. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(94)90408-1. PMID 8029707.
- Lauritsen, J.M., K.S. Hansen, and A. Skytthe: "Cancer incidence among mild steel and stainless steel welders and other metal workers," Archived 1 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine October 1996, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, pp.373-82, summarized on website of National Institutes of Health, retrieved 16 March 2020
- Lauritsen, J.M. and K.S. Hansen, "Lung cancer mortality in stainless steel and mild steel welders: a nested case-referent study," Archived 10 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine, October 1996, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, summarized on website of National Institutes of Health, retrieved 16 March 2020
- Knudsen, L.E. and H. Burr, "[Follow-up examination of Danish stainless steel welders previously examined in 1987]," Archived 1 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine (article in Danish) 14 July 2003 Ugeskr Laeger, 165(29):2882-6, summarized on website of National Institutes of Health, retrieved 16 March 2020
- Rapaport, Lisa, "More evidence welding fumes raise lung cancer risk" Archived 14 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine, 21 May 2019, Reuters News Service, retrieved 16 March 2020
- "Welding and cancer," Archived 20 June 2020 at the Wayback Machine in "Welding" on the website of the Cancer Council Australia, retrieved 16 March 2020
- Kamerud, Kristin L.; Hobbie, Kevin A.; Anderson, Kim A. (19 September 2013). "Stainless Steel Leaches Nickel and Chromium into Foods during Cooking". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 61 (39): 9495–9501. doi:10.1021/jf402400v. ISSN 0021-8561. PMC 4284091. PMID 23984718.
- Safe Cookware: Does Stainless Steel Leach Chemicals? Archived 26 June 2021 at the Wayback Machine healthybuildingscience.com, accessed 28 January 2019
- "Nickel Compounds," Archived 15 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine in "Cancer-Causing Substances", in "Risk Factors," in "Cancer Causes and Prevention," in "About Cancer," at the website of the National Cancer Institute, retrieved 16 March 2020
- "Can Common Cookware Cause Cancer?" Archived 13 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine 8 February 2015, UPMC HealthBeat, UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), retrieved 16 March 2020
- Honeycombe, R. W. K. (1981). Steels: microstructure and properties. London: E. Arnold. ISBN 0-7131-2793-7. OCLC 7576277.
- International Standard ISO15510:2014 (subscription required)
- Lacombe, P.; Baroux, B.; Béranger, G. (1990). Les aciers inoxydables [Stainless Steels] (in French). Paris: Ed. de physique. Chapters 14 and 15. ISBN 9780868831428. Retrieved 8 March 2020.
- Peckner, D.; Bernstein, I.M. (1977). Handbook of Stainless Steels. McGraw-Hill Handbooks. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 9780070491472. Retrieved 8 March 2020.