Pickering Nuclear Generating Station
Pickering Nuclear Generating Station is a Canadian nuclear power station located on the north shore of Lake Ontario in Pickering, Ontario. It is one of the oldest nuclear power stations in the world and Canada's third-largest, producing about 15% of Ontario's power and employing 3,000 workers.
|Pickering Nuclear Generating Station|
A unit at the Pickering plant
|Location||Pickering, Durham Region, Ontario|
|Commission date||1971–73 (A station)|
1983–86 (B station)
|Decommission date||28 May 2007 (A2)|
31 Oct 2008 (A3)
|Owner(s)||Ontario Power Generation (OPG)|
|Operator(s)||Ontario Power Generation (OPG)|
|Nuclear power station|
|Reactor type||CANDU PHWR|
|Cooling source||Lake Ontario|
|Thermal capacity||6 × 1744 MWth|
|Units operational||2 × 515 MW|
4 × 516 MW
|Make and model||2 × CANDU 500A|
4 × CANDU 500B
|Units decommissioned||2 × 515 MW|
|Nameplate capacity||3094 MW|
|Annual net output||20,017 GW·h (2016)|
|Commons||Related media on Commons|
The reactors can be classified as follows:
- PICKERING A 1
- PICKERING A 2 (Safe Shutdown state, defuelled)
- PICKERING A 3 (Safe Shutdown state, defuelled)
- PICKERING A 4
- PICKERING B 5
- PICKERING B 6
- PICKERING B 7
- PICKERING B 8
This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
The facility was constructed in stages between 1966 and 1986 by the provincial Crown corporation, Ontario Hydro, with significant completion scheduled for 1971. In April 1999, Ontario Hydro was split into five component Crown corporations with Ontario Power Generation (OPG) taking over all electricity generating stations. OPG continues to operate the Pickering station.
The Pickering station is one of the largest nuclear facilities in the world, comprising six operating CANDU nuclear reactors with a total output of 3,100 MW when all units are on line, and two non-operating units currently shut down in safe storage. The facility is connected to the North American power grid via numerous 230,000 and 500,000-volt transmission lines.
The facility was operated as two distinct stations, Pickering A (Units 1 to 4) and Pickering B (Units 5 to 8) until 2011. While primarily administrative in nature, the division was not wholly artificial, as there are some distinct differences in design between the two groups of stations. (Example: The Pickering A units employ a moderator dump as a shutdown mechanism, a feature not found in Pickering B.) There are, however, a number of systems and structures in common between the two stations; the most notable of these is the shared vacuum building, a negative pressure containment system. The operation of Pickering A and B was unified in order to reduce costs now that Pickering A Units 2 and 3 are shut down in safe storage.
On December 31, 1997 the four Pickering A reactors were shut down by Ontario Hydro and placed in lay up, suspending work on upgrades to the shutdown system. Ontario Hydro committed to restarting the units, but the project underwent long delays and large cost over-runs.
Premier Mike Harris asked former federal energy Minister Jake Epp to study and make recommendations on the problems with the Pickering restart. Mr. Epp acknowledged the large cost over-runs and delays attributing blame to bad management. The Epp Review estimated the cost of restarting the remaining reactors at $3 – 4 billion and supported the continuation of the project.
The election of the Ontario Liberal Party in 2003 delayed action on the Epp report. The government of Dalton McGuinty appointed Epp to the Ontario Power Generation Review headed by John Manley to examine the future role of Ontario Power Generation (OPG) in the province's electricity market, examine its corporate and management structure, and decide whether the public utility should proceed with refurbishing three more nuclear reactors at the Pickering nuclear power plant. The report recommended proceeding with the restart Pickering “A” reactors 1, 2, and 3, sequentially. (Unit 4 was restarted in 2003.) The report argued that the restart of units 2 and 3 would be contingent on whether “OPG will be able to succeed at the Unit 1 project."
The McGuinty government accepted the OPG Review Committee's recommendation and allowed the restart of reactor 1, which still underwent cost over-runs and delays. In August 2005, the OPG Board of Directors announced that Units 2 and 3 would not be refurbished due to specific technical and cost risks surrounding the material condition of these two units.
The anti-nuclear group Sierra Club of Canada criticized the report for not attributing any blame to the problems of nuclear technology, noting that there were no energy or environmental experts appointed to the panel.
Numerous changes in executive-level staff and project management strategy were made for the follow-on project to refurbish Unit 1. The experience of refurbishing Pickering A Unit 1 was significantly different from Unit 4, with a much tighter adherence to schedule and budget. Unit 1 was returned to service in November 2005, providing 542 MW of generating capacity for Ontario's electricity system.
In August 2005, the OPG Board of Directors announced that Units 2 and 3 would not be refurbished due to specific technical and cost risks surrounding the material condition of these two units.
The used nuclear fuel and some refurbishment waste generated by the plant sits on-site at the Pickering Waste Management Facility. All operational low and intermediate-level waste is transported to OPG's Western Waste Management Facility at the Bruce nuclear site near Kincardine, Ontario. OPG has proposed the construction and operation of a deep geologic repository for the long-term storage of low and intermediate level waste on lands adjacent to the Western Waste Management Facility. The Nuclear Waste Management Organization is currently seeking a site for a potential repository for the used fuel from all Canadian nuclear reactors.
In January 2016, the Province of Ontario approved plans to pursue continued operation of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station to 2024.
OPG will work with the Ministry of Energy, the Independent Electricity System Operator and the Ontario Energy Board to pursue continued operation of the Pickering Station to 2024. All six units would operate until 2022; two units would then shut down and four units would operate to 2024. Extending Pickering's operation will ensure a reliable, clean source of base load electricity during refurbishment of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station and the initial Bruce Nuclear refurbishments.
Any plan to extend Pickering's life requires approval from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). OPG is currently working on a licence application to the CNSC for approval in 2018.
After operation of Pickering concludes, OPG will begin the longer term decommissioning process as refurbishment will not be pursued. The first step in the long term decommissioning process is to layup the reactors and place them into safe storage. Pickering staff will have future employment opportunities placing the Pickering units in a safe storage state, at the Darlington refurbishment and operations, or at the potential new build at Darlington.
OPG has begun planning for the station's end of commercial operations including the potential repurposing of the Pickering site location.
OPG will proceed with a detailed planning phase for the mid-life refurbishment of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station east of Toronto, with construction expected to start in 2016. The business decision to move forward with an investment in Darlington came after initial studies on the plant's condition operating performance returned positive results.
In January 2016, the Province of Ontario announced its decision to proceed with refurbishment of Darlington.
A serious incident occurred on 1 August 1983. Pressure tube G16 in the Pickering A Unit 2 reactor developed a 2 metre long split. The reactor was safely shut down and the damage investigated. The cause was found to be the mis-location of annulus gas spacer springs which allowed the hot pressure tube to sag and touch the inside of the cold calandria tube leading to hydrogen enrichment of the cooler areas. This created a series of small cracks which linked up and caused the long rupture. There was some local fuel damage and the reactor was safely shut down by the operators with no increase in radioactive emissions. The eventual resolution was Large Scale Fuel Channel Replacement and all the pressure tubes were replaced in all Pickering A reactors. The new pressure tubes were supported by an improved design of the annulus gas spacer springs. Since then, careful monitoring of the location of the annulus gas spacer rings has been a significant part of routine reactor inspections.
On December 10, 1994 there was a loss of coolant accident. Said to be the most serious accident in Canadian history (June 2001) by The Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources. The Emergency Core Cooling System was used to prevent a meltdown.
In 1994 Pickering Unit 7 set a world record for continuous operation (894 days) without a shutdown. This record remained standing for 22 years, before finally being broken in August 2016 by Heysham 2 Unit 8, an AGR type reactor in the United Kingdom.
On March 14, 2011, there was a leak of 73 cubic metres of demineralized water into Lake Ontario from a failed pump seal. There was negligible risk to the public according to the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.
2020 nuclear incident alertEdit
On January 12, 2020 at 07:23 EST (UTC-5), an emergency alert was issued via Alert Ready stating that an incident had been reported at the station. The alert applied to everyone within 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) of the station and read that "there has been no abnormal release of radioactivity from the station and emergency staff are responding to the situation". At 09:11 EST, a second alert was issued, stating that the previous alert had been sent in error. Both alerts were received by the majority of Ontario residents, in addition to many neighboring Quebec residents in the Ottawa region, and prompted many residents to question the reliability of the emergency alert system and demand investigation.
- Ontario Power Generation Review Committee, Transforming Ontario’s Power Generation Company, March 2004, p. 47
- "The Sierra Club info". Sierra Club Canada.
- "OPG's DGR". Retrieved 2011-04-11.
- Ontario Moving Forward with Nuclear Refurbishment at Darlington and Pursuing Continued Operations at Pickering to 2024. Ontario Government news release, Jan 11, 2016
- "Ontario Power Generation | Pickering Nuclear". www.opg.com. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
- "Ministry of Energy » Ontario's Long-Term Energy Plan". www.energy.gov.on.ca. Retrieved 2016-06-28.
- Repurposing Pickering, Ontario Power Generation website, Retrieved June 27, 2016
- EXAMINATION OF THE PRESSURE TUBE RUPTURE AT PICKERING NGS ‘A’ UNIT 2, FUEL CHANNEL G16
- "Nuclear Threat in the Eastern Mediterranean" David H. Martin, June 2000, Page 10 (or page 17 of 106) Archived 2014-10-13 at the Wayback Machine
- "Pickering A Shutdown and Rehabilitation: A Brief History" page 4 (or page 11 of 51)
- "CANDU Reactors". CANDU Owners Group Inc. Archived from the original on 2012-02-25.
- "Canada's Nuclear History". AECL.
- Pickering Nuclear plant reports water leak, CBC News, March 16 2011
- "Pickering Nuclear Generating Station emergency alert issued in error, OPG says". Global News. Retrieved 2020-01-12.
- "Alert about Pickering nuclear plant incident sent 'in error,' no danger to the public, OPG says". CBC News. January 12, 2020. Retrieved January 12, 2020.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Pickering Nuclear Generating Station.|