Natural convection is a type of flow, of motion of a liquid such as water or a gas such as air, in which the fluid motion is not generated by any external source (like a pump, fan, suction device, etc.) but by some parts of the fluid being heavier than other parts. The driving force for natural convection is gravity. For example if there is a layer of cold dense air on top of hotter less dense air, gravity pulls more strongly on the denser layer on top, so it falls while the hotter less dense air rises to take its place. This creates circulating flow: convection. As it relies on gravity, there is no convection in free-fall (inertial) environments, such as that of the orbiting International Space Station. Natural convection can occur when there are hot and cold regions of either air or water, because both water and air become less dense as they are heated. But, for example, in the world's oceans it also occurs due to salt water being heavier than fresh water, so a layer of salt water on top of a layer of fresher water will also cause convection.
Natural convection has attracted a great deal of attention from researchers because of its presence both in nature and engineering applications. In nature, convection cells formed from air raising above sunlight-warmed land or water are a major feature of all weather systems. Convection is also seen in the rising plume of hot air from fire, plate tectonics, oceanic currents (thermohaline circulation) and sea-wind formation (where upward convection is also modified by Coriolis forces). In engineering applications, convection is commonly visualized in the formation of microstructures during the cooling of molten metals, and fluid flows around shrouded heat-dissipation fins, and solar ponds. A very common industrial application of natural convection is free air cooling without the aid of fans: this can happen on small scales (computer chips) to large scale process equipment.
- is the difference in density between the two parcels of material that are mixing
- is the local gravitational acceleration
- is the characteristic length-scale of convection: the depth of the boiling pot, for example
- is the diffusivity of the characteristic that is causing the convection, and
- is the dynamic viscosity.
Natural convection will be more likely and/or more rapid with a greater variation in density between the two fluids, a larger acceleration due to gravity that drives the convection, and/or a larger distance through the convecting medium. Convection will be less likely and/or less rapid with more rapid diffusion (thereby diffusing away the gradient that is causing the convection) and/or a more viscous (sticky) fluid.
For thermal convection due to heating from below, as described in the boiling pot above, the equation is modified for thermal expansion and thermal diffusivity. Density variations due to thermal expansion are given by:
- is the reference density, typically picked to be the average density of the medium,
- is the coefficient of thermal expansion, and
- is the temperature difference across the medium.
The general diffusivity, , is redefined as a thermal diffusivity, .
Inserting these substitutions produces a Rayleigh number that can be used to predict thermal convection.
In very sticky, viscous fluids (large ν), fluid motion is restricted, and natural convection will be non-turbulent.
Following the treatment of the previous subsection, the typical fluid velocity is of the order of , up to a numerical factor depending on the geometry of the system. Therefore, Grashof number can be thought of as Reynolds number with the velocity of natural convection replacing the velocity in Reynolds number's formula. However In practice, when referring to the Reynolds number, it is understood that one is considering forced convection, and the velocity is taken as the velocity dictated by external constraints (see below).
The Grashof number can be formulated for natural convection occurring due to a concentration gradient, sometimes termed thermo-solutal convection. In this case, a concentration of hot fluid diffuses into a cold fluid, in much the same way that ink poured into a container of water diffuses to dye the entire space. Then:
Natural convection is highly dependent on the geometry of the hot surface, various correlations exist in order to determine the heat transfer coefficient. A general correlation that applies for a variety of geometries is
The value of f4(Pr) is calculated using the following formula
Nu is the Nusselt number and the values of Nu0 and the characteristic length used to calculate Ra are listed below (see also Discussion):
|Inclined plane||x (Distance along plane)||0.68|
|Inclined disk||9D/11 (D = diameter)||0.56|
|Vertical cylinder||x (height of cylinder)||0.68|
|Cone||4x/5 (x = distance along sloping surface)||0.54|
|Horizontal cylinder||(D = diameter of cylinder)||0.36|
Warning: The values indicated for the Horizontal cylinder are wrong; see discussion.
Natural convection from a vertical plateEdit
In this system heat is transferred from a vertical plate to a fluid moving parallel to it by natural convection. This will occur in any system wherein the density of the moving fluid varies with position. These phenomena will only be of significance when the moving fluid is minimally affected by forced convection.
When considering the flow of fluid is a result of heating, the following correlations can be used, assuming the fluid is an ideal diatomic, has adjacent to a vertical plate at constant temperature and the flow of the fluid is completely laminar.
Num = 0.478(Gr0.25)
- hm = mean coefficient applicable between the lower edge of the plate and any point in a distance L (W/m2. K)
- L = height of the vertical surface (m)
- k = thermal conductivity (W/m. K)
- g = gravitational acceleration (m/s2)
- L = distance above the lower edge (m)
- ts = temperature of the wall (K)
- t∞ = fluid temperature outside the thermal boundary layer (K)
- v = kinematic viscosity of the fluid (m²/s)
- T = absolute temperature (K)
Note that the above equation differs from the usual expression for Grashof number because the value has been replaced by its approximation , which applies for ideal gases only (a reasonable approximation for air at ambient pressure).
When heat is fed into the system from one direction (usually below), at small values it merely diffuses (conducts) from below upward, without causing fluid flow. As the heat flow is increased, above a critical value of the Rayleigh number, the system undergoes a bifurcation from the stable conducting state to the convecting state, where bulk motion of the fluid due to heat begins. If fluid parameters other than density do not depend significantly on temperature, the flow profile is symmetric, with the same volume of fluid rising as falling. This is known as Boussinesq convection.
As the temperature difference between the top and bottom of the fluid becomes higher, significant differences in fluid parameters other than density may develop in the fluid due to temperature. An example of such a parameter is viscosity, which may begin to significantly vary horizontally across layers of fluid. This breaks the symmetry of the system, and generally changes the pattern of up- and down-moving fluid from stripes to hexagons, as seen at right. Such hexagons are one example of a convection cell.
As the Rayleigh number is increased even further above the value where convection cells first appear, the system may undergo other bifurcations, and other more complex patterns, such as spirals, may begin to appear.
Water convection at freezing temperaturesEdit
Water is a fluid that does not obey the Boussinesq approximation. This is because its density varies nonlinearly with temperature, which causes its thermal expansion coefficient to be inconsistent near freezing temperatures. The density of water reaches a maximum at 4 °C and decreases as the temperature deviates. This phenomenon is investigated by experiment and numerical methods. Water is initially stagnant at 10 °C within a square cavity. It is differentially heated between the two vertical walls, where the left and right walls are held at 10 °C and 0 °C, respectively. The density anomaly manifests in its flow pattern. As the water is cooled at the right wall, the density increases, which accelerates the flow downward. As the flow develops and the water cools further, the decrease in density causes a recirculation current at the bottom right corner of the cavity.
Another case of this phenomenon is the event of super-cooling, where the water is cooled to below freezing temperatures but does not immediately begin to freeze. Under the same conditions as before, the flow is developed. Afterward, the temperature of the right wall is decreased to −10 °C. This causes the water at that wall to become supercooled, create a counter-clockwise flow, and initially overpower the warm current. This plume is caused by a delay in the nucleation of the ice. Once ice begins to form, the flow returns to a similar pattern as before and the solidification propagates gradually until the flow is redeveloped.
Convection within Earth's mantle is the driving force for plate tectonics. Mantle convection is the result of a thermal gradient: the lower mantle is hotter than the upper mantle, and is therefore less dense. This sets up two primary types of instabilities. In the first type, plumes rise from the lower mantle, and corresponding unstable regions of lithosphere drip back into the mantle. In the second type, subducting oceanic plates (which largely constitute the upper thermal boundary layer of the mantle) plunge back into the mantle and move downwards towards the core-mantle boundary. Mantle convection occurs at rates of centimeters per year, and it takes on the order of hundreds of millions of years to complete a cycle of convection.
Neutrino flux measurements from the Earth's core (see kamLAND) show the source of about two-thirds of the heat in the inner core is the radioactive decay of 40K, uranium and thorium. This has allowed plate tectonics on Earth to continue far longer than it would have if it were simply driven by heat left over from Earth's formation; or with heat produced from gravitational potential energy, as a result of physical rearrangement of denser portions of the Earth's interior toward the center of the planet (i.e., a type of prolonged falling and settling).
- Donald L. Turcotte; Gerald Schubert. (2002). Geodynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66624-4.
- Kays, William; Crawford, Michael; Weigand, Bernhard (2004). Convective Heat and Mass Transfer, 4E. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0072990737.
- W. McCabe J. Smith (1956). Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-044825-4.
- Bennett (1962). Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-004667-2.
- Banaszek, J.; Jaluria, Y.; Kowalewski, T. A.; Rebow, M. (1999-10-01). "Semi-Implicit Fem Analysis of Natural Convection in Freezing Water". Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications. 36 (5): 449–472. Bibcode:1999NHTA...36..449B. doi:10.1080/104077899274624. ISSN 1040-7782.
- "Water - Density, Specific Weight and Thermal Expansion Coefficient". www.engineeringtoolbox.com. Retrieved 2018-12-01.
- Debenedetti, Pablo G.; Stanley, H. Eugene (June 2003). "Supercooled and Glassy Water" (PDF). Physics Today. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
- Giangi, Marilena; Stella, Fulvio; Kowalewski, Tomasz A. (December 1999). "Phase change problems with free convection: fixed grid numerical simulation". Computing and Visualization in Science. 2 (2–3): 123–130. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.31.9300. doi:10.1007/s007910050034. ISSN 1432-9360.
- Tong, Wei; Koster, Jean N. (December 1993). "Natural convection of water in a rectangular cavity including density inversion". International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 14 (4): 366–375. doi:10.1016/0142-727x(93)90010-k. ISSN 0142-727X.
- Ezan, Mehmet Akif; Kalfa, Mustafa (October 2016). "Numerical investigation of transient natural convection heat transfer of freezing water in a square cavity". International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow. 61: 438–448. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2016.06.004. ISSN 0142-727X.
- Moore, Emily B.; Molinero, Valeria (November 2011). "Structural transformation in supercooled water controls the crystallization rate of ice". Nature. 479 (7374): 506–508. arXiv:1107.1622. Bibcode:2011Natur.479..506M. doi:10.1038/nature10586. ISSN 0028-0836. PMID 22113691.