Open main menu

The Modern Slavery Act 2015 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is designed to combat modern slavery in the UK and consolidates previous offences relating to trafficking and slavery. The act extends to England and Wales. The bill was introduced to the House of Commons in draft form in October 2013 by James Brokenshire, Parliamentary Under Secretary for Crime and Security. The bill's sponsors in the Home Office were Theresa May and Lord Bates. It received Royal Assent and became law on 26 March 2015.[1]

Modern Slavery Act 2015
Long title An Act to make provision about slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour and about human trafficking, including provision for the protection of victims; to make provision for an Independent Anti-slavery Commissioner; and for connected purposes.
Citation 30
Dates
Royal assent 26 March 2015
History of passage through Parliament
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk

James Brokenshire was quoted as saying that the act would "send the strongest possible message to criminals that if you are involved in this disgusting trade in human beings, you will be arrested, you will be prosecuted and you will be locked up."[2]

Contents

ProvisionsEdit

The act contains a number of provisions:[3][4]

  • The consolidation of the existing slavery and trafficking offences
  • The introduction of two new civil orders to enable the courts to place restrictions on those convicted of modern slavery offences, or those involved in such offences but not yet convicted
  • The establishment of an independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner to encourage good practice on the prevention of modern slavery offences and the identification of victims. The first commissioner was Kevin Hyland
  • The provision of mechanisms for seizing traffickers’ assets and channelling some of that money towards victims for compensation payments
  • The creation of a new statutory defence for slavery or trafficking victims compelled to commit criminal offences
  • The provision of child trafficking advocates

Amendments to the billEdit

Supply chainEdit

The draft bill included no measures to counter the use of slave labour abroad as the Home Office believed that asking businesses to audit and report on modern slavery in their supply chains would be an “additional burden”. However, campaigning resulted in a supply chain clause being added to the bills so that “big business will be forced to make public its efforts to stop the use of slave labour by its suppliers”.[5] Consultation regarding the reporting requirements of the supply chain clause took place in February and March 2015.[6]

From 29 October 2015 the Transparency in Supply Chain Provisions require businesses to publish an annual statement if they have an annual turnover above a threshold (£36 million).[7] The statement must confirm the steps taken to ensure that slavery and human trafficking are not taking place in the business (or in any supply chain) or declare that no steps to confirm the existence of slavery or trafficking have been taken. It is expected that few businesses would take the latter option as it may place their ethical position into question and affect their reputation. There are, however, no legally binding requirements to conduct due diligence on supply chains and there are no criminal or financial penalties for non-compliance.[8]

On 21 March 2016 the Home Office held a Transparency in Supply Chains (TISC) event where an independent civil society modern slavery register, the TISC Report, was announced in order to provide a publicly searchable, accessible registry for companies to share their statements. At the point of launch, on the 1st April 2016, it was partnered with, amongst others, the Welsh Government, the Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and Business West. On 31 January 2017 it had 10,153 companies with statements held within its open data register, making it the largest modern slavery statement register globally.[9]

ProstitutionEdit

In November 2014 Fiona Mactaggart MP added an amendment to the bill concerning prostitution, aimed at criminalising the purchase of sex.[10][11] In the bill's debate in the House House of Commons, John McDonnell MP argued against the amendment. He highlighted the lack of evidence for any correlation between the Swedish sex purchase ban and a reduction in numbers of sex workers or their clients, and cited findings "that not only do such measures not work, they actually cause harm". McDonnell quoted Reverend Andrew Dotchin, a founding member of the Safety First Coalition: “I strongly oppose clauses on prostitution in the Modern Slavery Bill, which would make the purchase of sex illegal. Criminalising clients does not stop prostitution, nor does it stop the criminalisation of women. It drives prostitution further underground, making it more dangerous and stigmatising for women.”[12] The amendment was subsequently dropped.[13]

Tied visasEdit

In March 2015 an amendment was brought forward in the House of Lords concerning migrant workers who are brought to the UK by their employer using "tied visas". These workers are typically foreign domestic workers and they are not allowed to legally leave their job and find employment elsewhere. The system of tied visas, introduced in 2012, has been compared to the Kafala system of employer-sponsored workers used in some Middle East countries.[14] The amendment would have given workers in the UK using tied visas the right to change employer, but it was rejected by the House of Commons.[15]

Criticism of the billEdit

Experts in the issue were sceptical of the bill, believing that it had many shortcomings.[16] Parosha Chandran, a human rights barrister and United Nations expert on trafficking, claimed that "the bill is very poor on victim protection". Anthony Steen, who advised on the legislation and chairs the Human Trafficking Foundation, claimed that the bill failed to focus on the needs of victims of trafficking in the UK. “The bill is wholly and exclusively about law enforcement – but it shouldn’t be enforcement-based, it should be victim-based", he said.

Human rights group Liberty argued that the bill should have:[17]

  • Addressed abuses associated with the Domestic Overseas Worker Visa which prohibits individuals from changing their employer
  • Addressed the conflict of interest arising from UK Visas and Immigration being involved with the National Referral Mechanism which is used to identify trafficking victims and which acts as a gateway to support
  • Extended legal aid to slavery victims in civil matters

Implementation of the actEdit

One of the aims of the Home Affairs Select Committee's inquiry into prostitution legislation, which began in January 2016, was to examine the impact that the act had had on trafficking for the purposes of prostitution and whether further measures were needed to help those involved in prostitution to leave it.[18] Submissions to the inquiry published in June 2016 said that there had been 1,139 victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation in 2014.[19]

A review of the act in 2016 found that 289 offences were prosecuted under the act in 2015, and that there had been a 40% rise in the number of victims referred for support. In July 2016 the Anti-Slavery Commissioner suggested that the number of crimes being reported and investigated under the act was falling short of the real number of cases of human trafficking and modern slavery. In the same month prime minister Theresa May announced additional measures to assist the implementation of the act:

In 2017, figures published by the National Crime Agency indicated that there were over 300 current police operations investigating possible violations of the act, and that a total of 3,805 people had been reported as potential victims in 2016.[21] In September 2017 alone, nine people were jailed for offences under the act.[22]

In other countriesEdit

By 2018 legislation intended to minimise the impact of modern slavery on supply chains had been passed by seven of the G20 countries (including the UK).[23] In 2018 the Government of Australia introduced a Modern Slavery Bill to the Parliament of Australia, using the United Kingdom’s Modern Slavery Act 2015 as a model.[24] The bill was introduced following an investigation by the Parliamentary Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade which looked into whether Australia should adopt a comparable Modern Slavery Act, and which had given in-principle support for the proposal in August 2017.[25]

See alsoEdit

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ "Modern Slavery Act 2015". UK Parliament. Retrieved 7 April 2015. 
  2. ^ Wood, Helois (18 October 2013). "Old Bexley and Sidcup MP James Brokenshire announces plans to help end human trafficking". Newshopper. 
  3. ^ "Modern Slavery Bill 2014-15". UK Parliament. Retrieved 20 November 2014. 
  4. ^ "Modern Slavery Bill 2014-15 - Commons Library Research Paper". UK Parliament. 7 July 2014. 
  5. ^ Michael Pollitt (16 October 2014). "Unfinished abolitionists: Britain returns to the frontline of the war on slavery". New Statesman. 
  6. ^ Jehan-Philippe Wood; Hari Jon (27 February 2015). "Update on the Modern Slavery Bill - consultation on the transparency in supply chains clause". www.lexology.com. Globe Business Publishing Ltd. Retrieved 9 March 2015. 
  7. ^ The Modern Slavery Act 2015 (Transparency in Supply Chain) Regulations 2015, regulation 2
  8. ^ Sharon Benning-Prince (31 July 2015). "A Guide to the Modern Slavery Act for Your Business". ContractStore Legal Business Blog. Retrieved 7 August 2015. 
  9. ^ "World's largest anti-slavery register reaches 10k milestone, boosting the fight against exploitation" (Press release). TISC Report. 30 January 2017. 
  10. ^ Julia O'Connell Davidson (4 November 2014). "Convenient conflations: modern slavery, trafficking, and prostitution". Open Democracy. 
  11. ^ Katie Nguyen (3 Nov 2014). "British parliament to debate whether paying for sex should be illegal". Thomson Reuters Foundation. 
  12. ^ "House of Commons". UK Parliament. 4 November 2014. 
  13. ^ Niki Adams (6 November 2014). "Listen to sex workers – we can explain what decriminalisation would mean". The Guardian. 
  14. ^ Sloan, Alastair (17 March 2015). "UK tied visa system 'turning domestic workers into modern-day slaves'". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 March 2015. 
  15. ^ Perraudin, Frances (17 March 2015). "Modern slavery bill amendment rejected by MPs". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 March 2015. 
  16. ^ "Government's Modern Slavery Bill will 'fail victims and spare criminals'". The Independent. 14 December 2013. 
  17. ^ "Modern Slavery Bill must go further". Liberty. 9 March 2014. 
  18. ^ Nick Hudson (18 January 2016). "Decriminalise prostitution call as MPs look at shifting criminal blame". www.policeprofessional.com. Retrieved 5 January 2016. 
  19. ^ Home Affairs Select Committee (16 June 2016). "Key facts". www.parliament.uk. 
  20. ^ "Theresa May pledges £33m boost for fight against slavery in Britain". The Guardian. 31 July 2016. Retrieved 31 July 2016. 
  21. ^ "Modern slavery and trafficking 'in every UK town and city'". BBC News. 10 August 2017. 
  22. ^ "Modern slavery is disturbingly common". The Economist. 20 September 2017. 
  23. ^ "UK could have up to 136,000 modern slaves, rights foundation claims". Sky News. 19 July 2018. 
  24. ^ Gareth Hutchens; Ben Doherty (28 June 2018). "Modern slavery bill welcomed, but no penalties for breaching act". The Guardian. 
  25. ^ Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, Modern slavery and global supply chains, published August 2017, accessed 13 July 2018

External linksEdit