During the 16th-century colonization of Brazil, Old Tupi was the predominant language in the coastal regions of the country. Despite some dialectical variations, it became imperative for the fewer colonizers to learn it for territorial conquest. The earliest records of the language date back to the 1510s, but a substantial record was only produced in the 1540s. Jesuits played a crucial role in formalizing its grammar, with Joseph of Anchieta composing a grammar for it in 1555. Through miscegenation, Old Tupi permeated Brazilian society to the extent that even the children of Portuguese spoke it natively. Over time, it gave rise to lingua francas and contributed various words and a distinctive literature to Brazilian Portuguese and its society.

Joseph of Anchieta, the first grammarian of Old Tupi, by Benedito Calixto
Joseph of Anchieta, the first grammarian of Old Tupi, by Benedito Calixto

Beginning of colonization edit

In the 16th century, although hundreds of indigenous languages were spoken in the territory that would later become Brazil, in its coastal region and nearby areas practically the same indigenous language was spoken. This was observed early in colonization, despite the existence of some dialectal variations. According to Pero de Magalhães Gândavo [pt], "The language used along the entire coast is one, although in certain words it may differ in some parts, but not in a way that they cannot understand each other." The Portuguese referred to this language as the "Brasílica language"; nowadays, it is known as Old Tupi.[1][a]

It was the language colonizers learned and spoke for a long time, in order to be able to colonize the territory, as their population was much smaller than the indigenous one.[3] The existence of a main language spoken along the coast made it worthwhile to master it.[4] Eduardo de Almeida Navarro argues Old Tupi can, therefore, be considered a classical indigenous language.[1]

Early vocabularies edit

 
First folio of the oldest substantial record of Old Tupi

Accounts of the discovery of Brazil, from the voyage of Pedro Álvares Cabral in 1500, do not include records of Old Tupi.[5][6] Some terms of Tupi origin can be found in early Portuguese navigation documents,[5] such as those of the ship Bretoa in 1511, which mention various çagoys or çagoyns (Callitrichidae).[7] The first attempt to compile a list of terms from this language occurred during the circumnavigation voyage of Ferdinand Magellan in 1519;[5][8] collected in Guanabara Bay by Antonio Pigafetta, the five or six recorded words refer to items Tupinambás traded with Europeans.[9] The oldest substantial record of Old Tupi was produced in the 1540s by a Frenchman named Jehan Lamy.[10] It was also collected in Guanabara Bay[11] and contains 88 entries,[11] although some are repeated.[12]

Early grammatical descriptions edit

The first publication containing information on the language's grammar was published in 1578 by the French Calvinist Jean de Léry. He had visited visited Rio de Janeiro in the mid-1550s and added grammatical explanations as appendix to his travel narrative during the time of Villegaignon's France Antarctique.[13]

Influence in colonial Brazil edit

In English colonies, settler colonialism was practiced, with entire families migrating, maintaining social and ethnic segregation from the indigenous inhabitants of such locations. In Brazil, however, what occurred was exploitation colonialism. Entire families did not come, but rather men of low social status, exiles, and adventurers, who had to learn the language of the indigenous people in order to be able to deal with them. These men also formed mixed-race families.[14]

In 1546, John III sent to Brazil six Jesuits, including João de Azpilcueta Navarro [pt], the first to learn Old Tupi, alongside the first governor-general of the country, Tomé de Sousa.[15] Azpilcueta Navarro had already translated texts concerning creation and incarnation by 1550. In 1553, Pero Correia emphasized the importance of preparing materials in the indigenous language.[16] That same year, with the arrival of the second governor-general, Duarte da Costa [pt], Joseph of Anchieta came to Brazil, writing the first grammar of the language in 1555, though it would not see publication for another 40 years.[15][16][b] By 1566, Marcos Jorge's doctrine had made its way to Brazil and was translated into Old Tupi by Leonardo do Vale. Although catechetical texts in such language flourished, none were printed in the 16th century—in 1592, Jesuits sought permission to print a Christian doctrine and Anchieta's grammar, but only the latter was published, likely due to financial limitations.[16]

To convert the indigenous people, settlements were established, grouping together natives of different nations, protecting them from slavery. To catechize them, a parallel mythology was created, seeking analogies between Portuguese and Old Tupi.[15]

Anchieta's Art of Grammar edit

 
Frontispiece of Anchieta's Art of Grammar

Art of Grammar of the Most Used Language on the Coast of Brazil is the first grammar of a Brazilian indigenous language[18] and the second one of an American indigenous language.[19] It was written by Joseph of Anchieta between 1553 and 1555. During this period, he was unaware of the different forms of Old Tupi spoken in various regions; it is likely Anchieta initially wrote his grammar in the dialect spoken by the Tupi Indians.[c] The grammar was only published in 1595 and, therefore, may have been revised several times after he began living with the Tupinambás.[21][22] Anchieta's Art of Grammar was translated into German by linguist Julius Platzmann in 1874.[23]

Lingua francas edit

Broadly speaking, Old Tupi was spoken until the end of the 17th century, when it lost ground to lingua francas that emerged and were widely spoken in colonial Brazil, on its streets and in homes, even those of the nobility. According to Antônio Vieira, the children of the Portuguese learned the Portuguese language only at school. At least three lingua francas existed in Brazil, with two being the most prominent, namely, the Southern General Language, which disappeared in the early 20th century, and the Amazonian General Language [pt], which gave rise to Nheengatu.[24][25][d]

Cultural legacy edit

Old Tupi is the only indigenous language with a significant presence in the lexicon of the Portuguese spoken in Brazil, as well as in its toponymy and anthroponymy. It also left a legacy in Brazilian literature, such as the lyrical and theatrical poetry of Joseph of Anchieta and the letters of the Camarão Indians.[3]

Notes edit

  1. ^ It is not known by what name native speakers called it.[2]
  2. ^ Luís Figueira also published a grammar circa 1628.[17][3]
  3. ^ The term Tupi acquired a broad sense in the 19th century. Originally, it referred to the 16th-century Tupi–Guarani Indians established on the coast of Santos and São Vicente, as well as along the upper Tietê River. Anchieta referred to them as "Tupis of São Vicente" (also known as Tupiniquins), and their language exhibited some characteristics that distinguished it from that of the "Potiguaras of Paraíba to the Tamoios of Rio de Janeiro".[20]
  4. ^ A third was the General Language of Bahia.[26]

References edit

  1. ^ a b Navarro & Tessuto Júnior 2016, pp. 25–26.
  2. ^ Navarro 2005, p. 11.
  3. ^ a b c Navarro & Tessuto Júnior 2016, p. 26.
  4. ^ Dalby & Hair 1966, p. 65.
  5. ^ a b c Dalby & Hair 1966, p. 44.
  6. ^ Rodrigues 2000, p. 542.
  7. ^ Garcia 1942, p. 166.
  8. ^ Rodrigues 2000, p. 545.
  9. ^ Rodrigues 2000, pp. 545–546.
  10. ^ Dalby & Hair 1966, p. 42.
  11. ^ a b Rodrigues 2000, p. 546.
  12. ^ Dalby & Hair 1966, pp. 57–58.
  13. ^ Rodrigues 1997, p. 376.
  14. ^ Navarro & Tessuto Júnior 2016, p. 27.
  15. ^ a b c Navarro & Tessuto Júnior 2016, pp. 27–28.
  16. ^ a b c Egan & Lessa de Sá 2020, pp. 193–195.
  17. ^ Magalhães 2011, pp. 380–385.
  18. ^ Pereira 2006, p. 268.
  19. ^ Ferraz Gerardi 2023, p. 22.
  20. ^ Rodrigues 1995, pp. 226–227.
  21. ^ Navarro 2022, pp. 145–146.
  22. ^ Rodrigues 1997, pp. 373–374.
  23. ^ Drumond 1990, pp. 14–15.
  24. ^ Navarro & Tessuto Júnior 2016, pp. 28–29.
  25. ^ Navarro 2013, p. 537.
  26. ^ Navarro & Tessuto Júnior 2016, p. 29.

Bibliography edit