The glycemic index (GI; //) is a number from 0 to 100 assigned to a food, with pure glucose arbitrarily given the value of 100, which represents the relative rise in the blood glucose level two hours after consuming that food. The GI of a specific food depends primarily on the quantity and type of carbohydrate it contains, but is also affected by the amount of entrapment of the carbohydrate molecules within the food, the fat and protein content of the food, the amount of organic acids (or their salts) in the food, and whether it is cooked and, if so, how it is cooked. GI tables, which list many types of foods and their GIs, are available. A food is considered to have a low GI if it is 55 or less; high GI if 70 or more; and mid-range GI if 56 to 69.
The term was introduced in 1981 by David J. Jenkins and co-workers. It is useful for quantifying the relative rapidity with which the body breaks down carbohydrates. It takes into account only the available carbohydrate (total carbohydrate minus fiber) in a food. Glycemic index does not predict an individual's glycemic response to a food, but can be used as a tool to assess the insulin response burden of a food, averaged across a studied population. Individual responses vary greatly.
The glycemic index is usually applied in the context of the quantity of the food and the amount of carbohydrate in the food that is actually consumed. A related measure, the glycemic load (GL), factors this in by multiplying the glycemic index of the food in question by the carbohydrate content of the actual serving.
The glycemic index of a food is defined as the incremental area under the two-hour blood glucose response curve (AUC) following a 12-hour fast and ingestion of a food with a certain quantity of available carbohydrate (usually 50 g). The AUC of the test food is divided by the AUC of the standard (either glucose or white bread, giving two different definitions) and multiplied by 100. The average GI value is calculated from data collected in 10 human subjects. Both the standard and test food must contain an equal amount of available carbohydrate. The result gives a relative ranking for each tested food.
Foods with carbohydrates that break down quickly during digestion and release glucose rapidly into the bloodstream tend to have a high GI; foods with carbohydrates that break down more slowly, releasing glucose more gradually into the bloodstream, tend to have a low GI.
A lower glycemic index suggests slower rates of digestion and absorption of the foods' carbohydrates and can also indicate greater extraction from the liver and periphery of the products of carbohydrate digestion.
The current validated methods use glucose as the reference food, giving it a glycemic index value of 100 by definition. This has the advantages of being universal and producing maximum GI values of approximately 100. White bread can also be used as a reference food, giving a different set of GI values (if white bread = 100, then glucose ≈ 140). For people whose staple carbohydrate source is white bread, this has the advantage of conveying directly whether replacement of the dietary staple with a different food would result in faster or slower blood glucose response. A disadvantage with this system is that the reference food is not well-defined, because there is no universal standard for the carbohydrate content of white bread.
Glycemic index charts often give only one value per food, but variations are possible due to:
- Ripeness – riper fruits contain more sugars, increasing GI
- Cooking methods – the more cooked, or overcooked, a food, the more its cellular structure is broken, with a tendency for it to digest quickly and raise blood glucose more
- Processing – e.g., flour has a higher GI than the whole grain from which it is ground as grinding breaks the grain's protective layers and the length of storage. Potatoes are a notable example, ranging from moderate to very high GI even within the same variety.
More importantly, the glycemic response is different from one person to another, and also in the same person from day to day, depending on blood glucose levels, insulin resistance, and other factors.
The glycemic index only indicates the impact on glucose level two hours after eating the food. People with diabetes have elevated levels for four hours or longer after eating certain foods.
GI values can be interpreted intuitively as percentages on an absolute scale and are commonly interpreted as follows:
|Low||55 or less||fructose; pulses (black, pinto, kidney, lentil, peanut, chickpea); small seeds (sunflower, flax, pumpkin, poppy, sesame, hemp); walnuts, cashews, most whole intact grains (durum/spelt/kamut wheat, millet, oat, rye, rice, barley); most vegetables, most sweet fruits (peaches, strawberries, mangos); tagatose; mushrooms; chilis, unpeeled sweet potato|
|Medium||56–69||white sugar or sucrose, not intact whole wheat or enriched wheat, pita bread, basmati rice, unpeeled white/yellow potato, grape juice, raisins, prunes, pumpernickel bread, cranberry juice, regular ice cream, banana, peeled sweet potato|
|High||70 and above||glucose (dextrose, grape sugar), high fructose corn syrup, white bread (only from wheat endosperm), most white rice (only from rice endosperm), corn flakes, extruded breakfast cereals, maltose, maltodextrins, peeled white/yellow potato (83).|
A low-GI food will cause blood glucose levels to increase more slowly and steadily, which leads to lower postprandial (after meal) blood glucose readings. A high-GI food causes a more rapid rise in blood glucose level and is suitable for energy recovery after exercise or for a person experiencing hypoglycemia.
The glycemic effect of foods depends on various factors, such as the type of starch (amylose versus amylopectin), physical entrapment of the starch molecules within the food, fat and protein content of the food and organic acids or their salts in the meal. The presence of fat or soluble dietary fiber can slow the gastric emptying rate, thus lowering the GI. In general, coarse, grainy breads with higher amounts of fiber have a lower GI value than white breads.
Many modern diets rely on the glycemic index, including the South Beach Diet, Transitions by Market America and NutriSystem Nourish Diet. However, others have pointed out that foods generally considered to be unhealthy can have a low glycemic index, for instance, chocolate cake (GI 38), ice cream (37), or pure fructose (19), whereas foods like potatoes and rice have GIs around 100 but are commonly eaten in some countries with low rates of diabetes.
Dietary replacement of saturated fats by carbohydrates with a low glycemic index may be beneficial for weight control, whereas substitution with refined, high glycemic index carbohydrates is not. A Cochrane review found that adoption of low glycemic index (or load) diets by people who are overweight or obese leads to more weight loss (and better fat control) than use of diets involving higher glycemic index/load or other strategies. Benefits were apparent even with low glycemic index/load diets that allow people to eat as much as they like. The authors of the review concluded that "Lowering the glycaemic load of the diet appears to be an effective method of promoting weight loss and improving lipid profiles and can be simply incorporated into a person's lifestyle."
In clinical management of obesity, diets based on a low glycemic index/load appear to provide better glycemic and inflammatory control than ones based on a high glycemic index/load (and therefore could potentially be more effective in preventing obesity-related diseases). In overweight and obese children, adoption of low glycemic index/load diets may not lead to weight loss but might potentially provide other benefits.
Compared to quantity of carbohydrateEdit
Depending on quantities, the number of grams of carbohydrate in a food can have a bigger impact on blood sugar levels than the glycemic index does. Consuming less dietary energy, losing weight, and carbohydrate counting can be better for lowering the blood sugar level. Carbohydrates impact glucose levels most profoundly, and two foods with the same carbohydrate content are, in general, comparable in their effects on blood sugar. A food with a low glycemic index can have a high carbohydrate content or vice versa; this can be accounted for with the glycemic load (GL) where GL = GI% × grams of carbohydrate per serving.
Compared to insulin indexEdit
While the glycemic index of foods is used as a guide to the rise in blood glucose that should follow meals containing those foods, actual increases in blood glucose show considerable variability from person to person, even after consumption of identical meals. This is in part because glycemic index does not take into account other factors besides glycemic response, such as insulin response, which is measured by the insulin index and can be more appropriate in representing the effects from some food contents other than carbohydrates. In particular, since it is based on the area under the curve of the glucose response over time from ingesting a subject food, the shape of the curve has no bearing on the corresponding GI value. The glucose response can rise to a high level and fall quickly, or rise less high but remain there for a longer time, and have the same area under the curve.
- "glycaemic index noun". Oxford Learner's Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2017-05-23. Retrieved 2017-05-20.
- "Glycemic Index Defined". Glycemic Research Institute. Archived from the original on 2018-09-27. Retrieved 2012-08-01.
- Jenkins, D. J.; Wolever, T. M.; Taylor, R. H.; Barker, H.; Fielden, H.; Baldwin, J. M.; Bowling, A. C.; Newman, H. C.; Jenkins, A. L.; Goff, D. V. (March 1, 1981). "Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange". The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Volume 34. 34 (3): 362–366. doi:10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362. PMID 6259925. Archived from the original on September 1, 2019. Retrieved January 24, 2020.
- Jenkins, FJ; Wolever, TM; Taylor, RH; Barker, H; Fielden, H; Baldwin, JM; Bowling, AC; Newman, HC; Jenkins, AL; Goff, DF (1981). "Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange". Am J Clin Nutr. 34 (3): 362–6. doi:10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362. PMID 6259925. Archived from the original on 2017-07-02. Retrieved 2017-08-24.
- Zeevi, David; Korem, Tal; Zmora, Niv; Israeli, David; Rothschild, Daphna; Weinberger, Adina; Ben-Yacov, Orly; Lador, Dar; Avnit-Sagi, Tali; Lotan-Pompan, Maya; Suez, Jotham; Mahdi, Jemal Ali; Matot, Elad; Malka, Gal; Kosower, Noa; Rein, Michal; Zilberman-Schapira, Gili; Dohnalová, Lenka; Pevsner-Fischer, Meirav; Bikovsky, Rony; Halpern, Zamir; Elinav, Eran; Segal, Eran (2015). "Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses". Cell. 163 (5): 1079–94. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001. PMID 26590418.
- "Glycemic Load". Avis Regime. Archived from the original on 17 August 2016. Retrieved 12 May 2016.
- Brouns F, Bjorck I, Frayn KN, et al. (June 2005). "Glycaemic index methodology". Nutr Res Rev. 18 (1): 145–71. doi:10.1079/NRR2005100. PMID 19079901.
- "GI Database". Archived from the original on February 15, 2009. Retrieved 2012-08-01.
- Freeman, Janine (September 2005). "The Glycemic Index debate: Does the type of carbohydrate really matter?". Diabetes Forecast. Archived from the original on February 14, 2007.
- "Glycemic Index Traffic Light Food Chart". The GI Diet. Archived from the original on 2007-06-10. Retrieved 2018-08-14.
- "What is a Glycemic Index?". Angelika Christie. 2009-09-21. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2014-01-20.
- Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC (July 2002). "International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002". Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76 (1): 5–56. doi:10.1093/ajcn/76.1.5. PMID 12081815.
- Kirpitch, A. R.; Maryniuk, M. D. (2011). "The 3 R's of Glycemic Index: Recommendations, Research, and the Real World". Clinical Diabetes. 29 (4): 155–59. doi:10.2337/diaclin.29.4.155. ISSN 0891-8929. Archived from the original on 2015-12-22. Retrieved 2015-12-14.
- Glycemic Index: From Research to Nutrition Recommendations?. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. 2005. ISBN 978-92-893-1256-1. TemaNord2005:589. Archived from the original on 2013-12-27. Retrieved 2012-08-01.
- Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC (December 2008). "International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008". Diabetes Care. 31 (12): 2281–83. doi:10.2337/dc08-1239. PMC 2584181. PMID 18835944.
- "Nutrisystem". 2008-03-06. Archived from the original on May 6, 2008. Retrieved 2012-08-01.
- Brand-Miller J, Buyken AE (2012). "The glycemic index issue". Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 23 (1): 62–67. doi:10.1097/MOL.0b013e32834ec705. PMID 22157060. S2CID 205829601. Archived from the original on 2020-09-25. Retrieved 2019-06-27.
- Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Baur L (2007). "Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for overweight and obesity". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 (3): CD005105. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005105.pub2. PMC 9022192. PMID 17636786.
- Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G (2013). "Long-term effects of low glycemic index/load vs. high glycemic index/load diets on parameters of obesity and obesity-associated risks: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 23 (8): 699–706. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2013.04.008. PMID 23786819. Archived from the original on 2018-10-11. Retrieved 2017-05-30.
- Schwingshackl L, Hobl LP, Hoffmann G (2015). "Effects of low glycaemic index/low glycaemic load vs. high glycaemic index/ high glycaemic load diets on overweight/obesity and associated risk factors in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Nutr J. 14: 87. doi:10.1186/s12937-015-0077-1. PMC 4618749. PMID 26489667.
- "David Mendosa. Insulin Index. July 13, 2003". Mendosa.com. Archived from the original on 2010-09-04. Retrieved 2012-08-01.
- Human Nutrition Unit; School of Molecular Bioscience. "Glycemic Index". International GI database. University of Sydney. – Searchable database of over 2600 foods with their glycemic index and load values.
- List of low GI foods
- Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load calculator Total values for any combinations of foods and any number of servings are computed according to FAO/WHO specifications).