Draft talk:New Visions
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because although it was published prematurely, the topic itself is notable and the article can be expanded with appropriate sources. --Lastchapter (talk) 19:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because this is a historical art movement founded by two artists with a presence on Wikipedia. I'm in the process of editing this but did not include much as the initial page had to be moved (an option not available until publishing) because the title had a spelling error — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windsorchair (talk • contribs) 19:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editUnclear why this is marked for speedy deletion, seems to be a real art movement that may be worth expanding-- marking as a stub and marking as overly reliant on single source, for now at least, but deletion seems an extreme and unproductive response to take?--Jackie.salzinger (talk) 19:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because it was moved to main page before it was finished as part of an editathon. I don't think the editor was aware of the policy Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict. I would request a draftify --Lajmmoore (talk) 19:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)