Draft talk:Critical Acclaim

Fair use rationale for Image:Critical Acclaim.jpg

Image:Critical Acclaim.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

not correct

it is not fair or accurate to put words into someones mouth or specify a band or group they may not like. thus i am removing the part about anti flag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamsenn (talk • contribs) 05:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually it is correct. Read it online, M. Shadows has mentioned it himself. The band is a bunch of republicans. And use common sense dude, "blaming their own nation for who wins elections...they've never contributed a fucking thing to the country they love to criticize." Don't be an idiot. I'm adding something along those lines because this page need to be more specific about what the song is actually about instead of trying to run around the subject ignorantly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epwspower (talk • contribs) 21:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Not Neutral Point of View

Is this fair to say things song is criticizing people with Liberal political views or is it just criticizing those who criticize soldiers? There is a difference. (JFerreira 04:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC))

Yes it is fair, but I would agree that there IS a difference. But still, please use common sense. Reread the lyrics if you have to, and read interviews with M. Shadows. This song is primarily against the democratic party. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Epwspower (talk • contribs) 21:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a place where you read into things. If you want to post a quote of him saying this then do so but we cannot go around trying to figure out the meanings of every song and then post it. (JFerreira 04:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC))

this is my POV, but i dont care.......im a democrat, served my country and now work for the federal govt. and i have a brother in iraq and a cousin about to go. my best friend was wounded there.....and every one of us is democrats. why is it that you have to be a republican to be patriotic? or a person that doesnt "point fingers"....its total bullshit. i liked avenged sevenfold until i read the lyrics of critical acclaim. they are one of "a few" bands that support the administration of the last 8 years.......they are the minority here. has any of them served in iraq? i doubt it, but they will point fingers in their lyrics, hypocrites66.141.179.31 (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2008 (UTC)j.crowson

The fact that Playstation magazine thinks the song is a boring download does not need to be on this article. It is an opinion which is probably a reaction to the political content.--70.186.194.105 (talk) 13:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

wrong

I have deleted the part about the reference to Perez Hilton. The lyrics aren't "Tabliod, Gossip queen, worthless man" but Tabloid, Gossip we want less real thus not referring to Perez Hilton at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.166.193.57 (talk) 20:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 12 August 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedural close of good-faith request–the proper venue for this is Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion; since Critical Acclaim is a redirect, there is nothing here to move. Dekimasuよ! 15:56, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

---

Critical Acclaim → Critical Acclaim (song) – This is a generic term that is a legitimate search term for other things related to Critic or Review. I am not sure of the ideal target though. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.