Although the Carl Haglund Foundation's Twitter account is not verified by Twitter, it is the only account linked from the Carl Haglund Foundation home page, and I think it's reasonable to conclude that it is the foundation's official account. White 720 (talk) 22:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- This is in regards to this revert. (copying response from my talk page) I don't agree that it's WP:DUE even under WP:BLPSPS. So what if they started a petition about something? Unless independent sources have taken note of it and given it coverage, it's just a self-serving claim. It's an encyclopedia article about Haglund, not a PR vehicle for his foundation. Schazjmd (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- My rationale for including the petition, which is being advertised by the foundation, is that it would seem to add color to the supposed mission of the foundation to provide "grants for education about homelessness and opioid addiction." Just reposting the mission statement is to give in to foundation PR; to provide more detail allows for improved neutrality. White 720 (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Nothing the Foundation has done has been reported on by any independent source, incidentally, so OK with omitting the Foundation from Mr. Haglund's page altogether. White 720 (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- I found a mention of the foundation in a Tacoma paper, added the ref. Schazjmd (talk) 00:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
