| Submission rejected on 2 December 2023 by S0091 (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by S0091 5 months ago. Last edited by Citation bot 2 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 17 November 2023 by CNMall41 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |  |
| Submission declined on 17 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 9 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission rejected on 3 November 2023 by Qcne (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Qcne 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 November 2023 by Qcne (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 5 July 2023 by Hey man im josh (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. | |
Comment: Same as before, sources are primary and/or brief mentions. S0091 (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Since last decline, there were two references added. One is from a university website and the other a press release so not independent. The rest of the sourcing appears to be brief mentions, stories written by her, interviews, or otherwise not reliable. CNMall41 (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Not quite enough in-depth, independent coverage. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: No WP:SIGCOV from independent, reliable sources. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: resubmitting, as I believe the previous rejection was premature. To the author: please also clean up the tone, as this contains some not-exactly-neutral language, eg
Kianpour's career continued to ascend as she secured exclusive interviews with high-profile figures such as Khaled Meshaa
asilvering (talk) 18:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Suzanne Kianpour | |
|---|---|
| Born | 23 November 1986 |
| Alma mater | Emory University, Georgetown University |
Suzanne Kianpour (born November 23, 1986)[1] is an Iranian-Italian-American presenter and correspondent for the BBC. She is the creator and host of BBC's series Women Building Peace.
Early life and education edit
Kianpour was born in Atlanta, Georgia to an Italian Mother and an Iranian Father. Her father hails from Masjed Soleyman in Iran, and is Shi'ite Islam while her mother's family originates from Bisacquino, Sicily and is Catholic.
Kianpour attended Emory University, where she was on the cross country team.[2]She graduated in 2009. She also studied at University College at Oxford. After graduating Emory, she attended Georgetown University for postgraduate studies, eventually returning as faculty for a fellowship with the Georgetown Institute of Politics and Public Service.[3]
Early Career edit
Suzanne Kianpour's career in journalism began at NBC News in Washington, where she worked as a page and was mentored by Savannah Guthrie. She was part of their 2010 Election Coverage that was nominated for an Emmy. [4] She then transitioned to the BBC, where she has been posted in Washington, Los Angeles, Beirut, and London.
BBC edit
In 2011, she made her on-air debut on BBC World News. While reporting from Lebanon she reported on the conspiracy theory alleging that Hillary Clinton admitted creating ISIS.[5] That same year, she was one of the first reporters to witness the aftermath of the Sinjar Massacre. Her reporting influenced President Barack Obama's decision to order airstrikes in Iraq and Syria.[6] She has also done several documentaries for the BBC like 'America's Place in the World,' and 'Out of the Shadows'. She covered significant political events, such as the Iran Nuclear Deal, US-Cuba détente and presidential elections. Currently, She is the creator and host of the award-winning BBC series 'Women Building Peace,' which highlights the role of women in war and peacebuilding efforts.
References edit
- ^ "Suzanne Kianpour". Emory. Retrieved 2023-11-03.
- ^ "Emory". Emory. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ "Suzanne Kianpour". Institute of Politics and Public Service. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ "Suzy Kianpour - Awards". IMDb. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ Taylor, Adam (2021-12-01). "'How Hillary Clinton created the Islamic State' — a new Mideast conspiracy theory". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
- ^ "Reporting Shapes Policy, BBC Journalist Says". 2018-11-16. Retrieved 2023-12-15.
External links edit