Submission declined on 21 June 2024 by Chetsford (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 24 days ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 3 May 2024 by Encoded (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Encoded 2 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 3 May 2024 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Vanderwaalforces 2 months ago.
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 3 May 2024 by Qcne (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Qcne 2 months ago.
| ![]() |
Comment: See WP:INLINECITE. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
The School for Commercial Communication (SCC) was a training course in Amsterdam for art directors and copywriters. It was a two-year international postgraduate course at master’s level from 1995 to 2005.
History
editIn England, in London, John Gillard developed his own training course for potential art directors and copywriters. The School of Communication Arts (SCA) operated from 1985 to 1995 under the tenet that the ‘creative idea’ was central to the course. This new way of teaching students by John Gillard was at once seen to innovative and was widely respected.[1]
School for Commercial Communication
editSubsequently, the School for Commercial Communication (SCC) course was launched in Amsterdam in 1995. Set up by Marien de Goffau and John Gillard. The 'creative idea' was still the primary goal of the teaching, but now developing creative ideas into a strategic structure that could be applied internationally. SCC operated from 1995 to 2005.[2]
Duration of the training
editThe SCC training lasted two years. The first year was an intensive training during which producing the creative idea continued to develop. The second year was an internship year.
Collaboration
editIn addition to the collaboration with advertising agencies and their clients, SCC also collaborated with other courses, such as Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College in England and Accademia di Comunicazione in Italy.[3]
There was a brief collaboration in the Netherlands with SWOCC and the University of Amsterdam (2004/2005), but this did not follow up. SCC stopped as a course in 2005.[4]
Awards and nominations
editThe students, always in teams art and copy, regularly won national and international prizes, including SJP, ADCN, D&AD.[5] [6]
Teachers and guest lecturers
editThe permanent and regular teachers over the years were: Marien de Goffau, Jerry Sjardin, Henk Haselaar, Birgit Bush, Pim Schregel, Hans Luijcx, Dave Morris, Paul Falla, Joris de Bie, Bas Strunk (a first year student in 1995, and deputy director SCC in 2005).
There were also many international guest teachers every year.[7]
References
edit- ^ [1]Adformatie - 31 oktober 2000 John Gillard
- ^ [2]PZC - Presentatie (SCC) School for Commercial Communication, 14 maart 1998, pagina 31 'Commercial is meer dan goed idee'
- ^ [3]Adformatie - Alliantie met Milaanse academie, 31 maart 2005
- ^ [4]PZC - Presentatie (SCC) School for Commercial Communication, 14 maart 1998, pagina 31 'way of thinking'
- ^ [5]Adformatie - Eervolle vermeldingen SJP/VEA, 19 maart 2002
- ^ [6]Adformatie - Eervolle vermeldingen Actie Jong Talent, 1 juni 2005
- ^ [7]PZC - Presentatie (SCC) School for Commercial Communication, 14 maart 1998, pagina 31 'guest lecturers'
External Links
editLeeuwarder Courant - 07-03-1998, pagina 61 [8]
Collaboration SWOCC and SCC [9]
Collaboration UvA/HvA and SCC [10]
Further reading
edit- Substantive report of the training: Adformatie, 2 december 1999. Annemiek van Grondel. 'Tweejarige School voor Commerciële Communicatie streeft naar profteams - Concept onder hoogspanning'
- Practical assignments and implementation: NieuwsTribune, 3 mei 2001. Peter van Woensel Kooy. 'SCC maakt commercials tegen alcohol in het verkeer - Impact zonder bloed'
- International training and intercultural cooperation: NieuwsTribune, 4 april 2002. Peter van Woensel Kooy. 'Studenten School voor Commerciële Communicatie op Zweedse toer - Juniortalent ontdekt retailkansen Ikea'
- Historical and substantive report of the 10th anniversary: Adformatie, Het Hart, pagina 29, 8 september 2005. 'School voor Commerciële Communicatie [Historisch en inhoudelijk verslag na 10 jaar]'
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.