| Submission declined on 6 February 2024 by Liance (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 6 June 2023 by Drmies (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 5 December 2022 by Tom (LT) (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 2 September 2022 by The Most Comfortable Chair (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. | |
Comment: Needs to concretely show, using sources not affiliated with this organisation, that it is independently notable. Tom (LT) (talk) 10:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) is an international non-profit research organization based in Ottawa, Ontario. It focuses on developing and endorsing Core Outcome Sets in rheumatology.[1] == Overview == OMERACT was founded in 1992 by Dr. Maarten Boers, Dr. Peter Brooks, Dr. Peter Tugwell, and Dr. Vibeke Strand. The company conducts research to improve outcomes for patients with autoimmune and musculoskeletal diseases. Since 2002, OMERACT has involved patients in research as Patient Research Partners (PRPs) to include patients’ perspectives in developing core outcome sets. [1]
OMERACT started the OMERACT Patient Research Partner Network, a virtual platform offering information, resources, education, and proven ideas for patients and researchers passionate about patient-centered international rheumatology outcome measurement research.[1]
As of 2024, OMERACT has 36 working groups, published over 1300 papers, and has held 16 conferences worldwide.
References edit
- ^ a b c "OMERACT continues to set standards on research outcomes, enhancing the patient voice". www.mdedge.com. Retrieved 2024-02-06.
External Links edit
· Website