Category talk:Non-fiction books
Latest comment: 17 years ago by 66.234.222.50 in topic pol books don't belong in "non fiction'
![]() | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I'm about to create a sub-cat of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Non-fiction books, ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Books about film, which would include reference works, history of film, Leonard Maltin, etc. Any thoughts? ♥ Her Pegship♥ 16:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable. -- Visviva 13:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
pol books don't belong in "non fiction'
editi realize that book publ, distrib, and sellers have traditionally categorized pol books as nonfic, but most ppl know they are (overall) fiction (at best, they consist mostly of opinion).
so, i ask rhetorically: why can't wiki-p represent more accurately? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.234.222.50 (talk) 06:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC).