This category is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
This category was nominated for deletion on 20 October 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.
Question on categorization of people into this categoryedit
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I see that there are some people included in this category. Is this correct, or should they be recategorized? Also, I see a subcategory of Category:Extraordinary People here. Is that a valid category (that should be changed to proper capitalization) or should that be taken to CfD? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
If the people are living people, we should have a reliable source so identifying the people before including them in the category. Similarly, for any other category that might include people, living people (and, ideally, all people) should be included only if there is a source that uses that exact word to describe each person. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 20:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Not limited to living people. This category is a collection of people who were clearly important, but the selection of people seems to be completely arbitrary. --mfb (talk) 09:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
