Controversial taxa is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This category is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the category attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetictree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What is meant by this? Currently there are taxa which are clearly valid in this category, they seem to be included because their exact affinities are debated, but that has nothing to do with taxonomic validity. So do they belong here? FunkMonk (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This category was just moved from "controversial taxa" without discussion (which should rarely if ever be done), and changes the scope of the category. Controversial is not the same as disputed. For example, the tarpan is controversial for what it contains, it is not disputed that it is a taxon. The move has probably messed up more cases like that. FunkMonk (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
