User talk:Tide rolls/Archive 6

Comment

Do you have ANY problem with how much you use Huggle? Why every day? Take this as something to respond to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.243.248 (talk) 01:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't use huggle every day. Tiderolls 01:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

• TR, note I subscribe to WP:DENY & WP:DFTT. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 01:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

As do I, Dave. I've committed to respond here and since the request was polite I decided to respond. I think we are of the same mind that the possibility that this user is disingenuous is very high. If I get a real sense of being trolled WP:DENY is close at hand. If I've misinterpreted your intent please let me know. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Nope, not trolling. Just two feelings: curious and misunderstood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.243.248 (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Stetson Middle School

Would you mind restoring the PROD tag you removed? There is nothing inherently notable about middle schools. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Already done. Tiderolls 01:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 02:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism: Repeated Deletions of WCLX History By Abusive Contributor 'PeterTripp' and Now By Wikipedia

It's interesting that you backed out my "unsourced" changes when the entire existing article on WCLX is unsourced. Is this just because I haven't bothered to register an account? Your contributor "PeterTripp" is attempting to control the history of this station because he has an infantile dispute with the former operators of the station. If my registering with Wikipedia increases my credibility, I shall do so, but I don't condone the infantile actions of 'PeterTripp', and neither should you. If you only want sourced content in this article, then you should delete this entire article. I am resubmitting my edits, pending your direction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.163.254 (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The entire existing article is not unsourced. I have opinions regarding Petertripp's editing as well as the users that insist on using the article as a battleground. Please, make whatever edits you feel are necessary. I will not engage in an edit war to prove a point, but your edits will be subject to the scrutiny of all editors and will be subject to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Regards Tiderolls 19:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Here we go again. I'll take the opportunity now to point out that User:Petertripp was taken to the conflict of interest noticeboard, didn't respond to his relevant thread, and hasn't made a controversial edit since. The article as it stands is, for the most part, referenced by independent third-party sources. It is of a neutral tone for the first time in its history. I provided sources for the parts of the article I could find references for and deleted the rest; this was reverted by Petertripp, but Tide restored it after the aforementioned COI had settled down. Most recently it has been changed by another completely uninvolved editor who - and excuse me for my frank tone here - removed much of the POV and irrelevant detail that your edit brought. If you have any specific concerns about the article as it stands, and can back them up with references, then have at it; if your only concern with the article is that it doesn't pander to your point of view, then I think we're done here. This back-and-forth POV edit-warring has gone on long enough. SMC (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mister Rolls

I believe you have made a mistake on my Josh Peck edit. Those lines that I put into the interview were the raw, unedited feeling of the Mister Peck we all know and love. Sometimes you just have to infer. Not everything needs to be typed out. Respectfully yours, Cinnamon Rolls —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.51.179 (talk) 23:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

wycleff jean

All I want to know is where was he born?

You can find that information in the article. Or, by following the links in any of the warnings on your user talk. Tiderolls 17:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Is this some kind of dumb meme we're seeing? DMacks (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Meh...probably kids. I've not seen it before, but you could fill volumes with stuff I've not seen. Tiderolls 17:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

wycleff Jean

All I was trying to do was help somebody —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.186.229 (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Little

There are videos which feature him saying those words, especially the Speed Rape Combo is widely used in them. 82.52.19.236 (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll strike the templated message I left on your user talk. Please do not use article talk pages as a forum; they are meant to be used to discuss article development. Regards Tiderolls 18:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Many Thanks

Your recent revert cited unsourced content in the edit summary. I have therefore began to systematically remove all such content from the same article. You have shown me the light. Thank You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.148.6 (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thank you for reverting the IP address' vandalism to my talk page. - Zhang He (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks for doing me the same favor. Tiderolls 19:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) - Zhang He (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank You

I didn't know that. But I do know that editors rely on being able to see these messages if they are warning them further. Most editors wil not be aware of someone's warnings and will contunue to give them first warnings if they can't see them. Thank you for the info though. KezianAvenger™ 00:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fatal diseases

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of fatal diseases. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fatal diseases. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

NerdyScienceDude has given you a cookie!

NerdyScienceDude has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 16:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks :) Tiderolls 16:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

You made a mistake.

One of Rob Halford nicknames is Master of the Dark Hole. Your making a mistake. I happen to be a well known member of a Metal forum. I can easily outmatch you in Metal faqs. Please change it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.137.73 (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

• That's not even funny. Don't mess with one of the gods of metal. Drmies (talk) 05:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

If you could please provide the source for your edit. Please check out Wikipedia:Reliable sources for descriptions of the sources that are acceptable. Thanks Tiderolls 05:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Professor...hope things are well with you. Tiderolls 05:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Luge

Hey, Why did you reverted this [1]??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.25.97.196 (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

The article is under a 4chan attack and your edit got zapped by mistake. Looking at it I don't see where it's necessary, but if you put it back I won't revert. Apologies Tiderolls 05:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

God, 4chan again? Good thing I'm off to bed. I wish you were an admin already; no one is faster on the trigger, and mostly you're right. I'm fine, thanks--yourself? My skater got gold on the 5000m so I'm pretty pleased. Roll Tide! Drmies (talk) 05:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Funny that, a friend linked the 4chan thread to me. I've requested sprotection. They've got a bunch more articles in the works though. SMC (talk) 05:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

You won't revert? Then what hapenned? [2] You know what? forget it. Now the article is protected and i can't edit it. You know, i tried to improve wikipedia, but i only see atacks from you to my editions. Thanks anyway...--190.25.97.196 (talk) 05:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Improvments like this? Thanks anyway. Tiderolls 05:53, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

What?

Luge - I'm twelve. What is this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.67.130.49 (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

That's why folks write the articles. So you can read them and learn the subject. Tiderolls 05:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know again...

...when you leave a {{talkback}} on my talk page, please sign it so I know who it's from. It also helps MiszaBot out when archiving. Thank you, and keep up the vandalism-reverting. I also really want to nominate you for adminship. I think you'd really benefit with the block tool. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 23:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree. You have absolutely the right attitude for the tools, and if you ever decide to accept a nomination you'll have my complete support. SMC (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Tide rolls, may I please nominate you? You'd really benefit from the admin tools, and I think you deserve the right to use the mop. Let me know if I can. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 03:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your confidence in me, but I won't be ready to make a decision for a few more months. Maybe this summer...I'll have to see how I feel about it then. I'm satisfied doing the job I'm doing presently. Thanks for your enthusiasm. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem, just let me know when you're ready. Thanks for signing the {{Talkback}}. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 03:30, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Aperture Science

Kind sir, you have misinterpreted what vandilism is. Ahem, "edits/reverts over a content dispute are never vandalism" from the vandalism page. There should be no issue as far as I do not discredit the Portal article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mastado (talk • contribs) 00:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Without doubt I am capable of error. However, I don't think I am in this instance. I know the difference between a content dispute and vandalism. Your current edit to this page may well stand. Other editors will decide that outcome. If you decide to to add nonsensical content to this or any article, I will revert you. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 00:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

E-mail sent

I've just zapped an e-mail to you. Schfifty3 00:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Characters of Half-Life

I am messaging you in regards to your reverts to my edit on the characters of Half-Life. The character "Dog" is actually spelled as "D0G" as per the creator's designation. My edit was not vandalism; merely a simple correction. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me.Mastado (talk) 02:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Everything I've found says the spelling you provide is occasionally used. However, I did not revert you because I have an opinion aboout the article's content; I reverted your edit because you didn't include an edit summary and because you have a history of adding nonsense to articles. Dog, D0g...whatever... Tiderolls 03:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Awesome work!

Wow, I was undoing vandalism on Attila the Hun, and all of a sudden, you come out of nowhere, and undo it, as well as give the person a warning faster than I could! Nice work! Brambleclawx 00:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Apologies for stepping on your edit. Please continue to help us keep the place tidy. If I get in your way too much, drop me a line...let me I need to slow down. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

No its fine, I'm just very impressed. Today is my first ever recent changes patrol! Brambleclawx 00:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

If I can ever be of assistance, let me know. It's good to know there are folks out there helping. Tiderolls 00:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for removing vandalism from my userpage, and very quickly too! --Taelus (talk) 00:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Always glad to help. Thanks for letting me know that you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank You!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thank you for reverting the attack on my userpage! Brambleclawx 19:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the recognition and for letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. I'm sure you can maintain your page, but I never know when folks are logged on. It just didn't seem right leaving that edit in place. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Joshserpe

Dear Tide Rolls,

I am sorry to bother you,but the user Joshserpe has vandalised the article Jimmie Johnson.On his page he has already recieved his last warning which was because of vandalising page Randy Moss Motorsports.Thank You.

, Sincerly Nascar1996 (talk•contribs) 01:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

No bother at all. That user's last edit was reverted by an admin so they'll get all the attention that's necessary. Things always seem to work out in time. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Ok.Nascar1996 (talk•contribs) 02:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Unexplained revert

Please review this revert - thanks. 92.4.59.122 (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

I can explain that. You removed content without an explanation; that's why you were reverted. - Zhang He (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Well, the revert was explained. It was simply explained in error. I will self revert if it has not already been addressed and strike any message on your talk. Apologies. Tiderolls 00:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

I moved the ==Places== & ==Other occurrences== sections (from Enoch) to Enoch (disambiguation). The edit summary was: moving ==Places== & ==Other occurrences== to Enoch (disambiguation). Anyway, thanks for the self-revert. 92.4.59.122 (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for that revert on my talk page. :) - Zhang He (talk) 01:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Always glad to help. You've done the same for me...we all could use help from time to time. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Question

Why do you allow them to remove my relevant information?

I added a link to a site that is not even mine, warning users of PayPal.

This is more than useful.

You just want everyone to keep using PayPal, so you remove it. I am sure you work for PayPal.

Perhaps you might engage the editors without attacking them and making accusations. That's just a suggestion...of course you can ignore it. Your choice. Regards Tiderolls 01:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Why? read ASAP

Why do people get warnings? Also, what if you edit the page with correct information, do you get a warning too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.214.33 (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

People get warnings when they vandalize pages, and if you edit a page with the correct information, you won't get a warning. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 01:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

To add to 12/21/12Freak's correct answer above. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines; violating those will get one warnings. If you read Wikipedia:Verifiability you will find that to be "correct" is not sufficient. You must include reliable sources and it's optimum to gain a consensus for one's edits as well. I hope that helps. Regards Tiderolls 01:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Why? read ASAP

I think that it is unfair for people to get warnings. I recently just added something to a page that was useful and correct and someone removed it. :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.214.33 (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Your edit was vandalism, as it added something unrelated to the article. Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism to find out what vandalism is and all the types of vandalism. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 02:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

D' Lucky Ones to D'Lucky Ones

Sorry Tide rolls. I only transferred the content of D' Lucky Ones to D'Lucky Ones. I did it because the title of the article is opposite to its content.--FDJoshua22 (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Ahhhh...no need to apologize...I was hoping there was a reason. Looking at your contributions you seemed to know what you were doing. If you had used an edit summary it would've been helpful. Thanks for coming here to explain. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I hereby award you this barnstar for all the vandalism you have reverted from Wikipedia. thanks! Western Pines (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Western Pines. Thanks for the recognition. We all help where we're able :) See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for Keeping the Place Clean

Thanks for reverting vandalism at my page. I appreciate your work. Also, ROLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Tide Roll! I grew up in Tuscaloosa and once worked for the Alabama Football Radio Network. Love you username. JodyB _talk 04:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, of course. Always good to meet fellow Bamers :) See ya 'round. Tiderolls 04:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

There's something unique about you.

Not really wiki-important, but every time I check your contributions in the evening, you're active on Huggle! I don't know why, but that just seems to be recurring. Have a good day. :-) Schfifty3 00:50, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I see him doing the evening shift on quashing vandalism. NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 00:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I think you might have the wrong IP or something.

I haven't been on Wikipedia at all recently other than to check out reviews for the new Joanna Newsom album. The only other person who uses this computer is my younger brother and I'm pretty sure he wasn't here to do it. I know that I'm not really being penalized, but I still think you made a mistake in saying that I vandalized that article. Just thought I'd let you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.56.108 (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, hi. You realise that was a six-month old warning, right? HalfShadow 01:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I had to check that one myself, HalfShadow. And still it was the little brother...who was absent... Tiderolls 01:41, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Well duh. It's always the little brother. HalfShadow 01:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Carter Beauford is the greatest drummer off all time and he is also god....

Those are facts and you should NOT remove them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.243.188.199 (talk) 02:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

You're assuming that I think the content of your edits is false. You are mistaken. I am not reverting your edits because they are false; I am reverting them because they are grafitti. Locate reliable sources, cite them properly and your content will not be reverted by me. Regards Tiderolls

'...he is also god.' Yeah, no worries of NPOV here, huh? HalfShadow 17:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Are you a robot?

because you found 3 words hidden in thousands of words in seconds..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.243.188.199 (talk) 02:11, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Dear vandal,

Tide rolls was browsing the recent changes. There is a difference page that highlights what was recently changed. He reverted your edit very quickly because Wikipedia itself offers these tools.  Awesomeness  talk  00:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Cheers!

Thanks for keeping an eye out!--Technopat (talk) 00:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I appreciate you letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey. Thanks for that. Cheers. Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 19:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. I appreciate all your hard work as well. See ya 'round Tiderolls 19:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Why?

Why do you almost always beat me in reverting vandalism? I click the [rollback] button and it says "Rollback failed, the last revision was by Tide rolls." Can you please explain this? NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 16:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

You might check into this. It's the only explaination I can come up with. Tiderolls 16:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Observation

I did not edit the Bioshock 2 page. Thanks. 24.2.44.212 (talk) 09:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC) Wiki user

[3] Tiderolls 11:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for taking care of my "fan page". I seem to have quite the following. ;) Uncle Dick (talk) 00:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. It confused me at first; I knew your user page was a red link and I couldn't make sense of the edits. I back pedaled a bit and saw the creation. Then I zapped it. Sorry to make your claim to fame a brief one. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Just a quick note

When you warned this guy for vandalism, you accidentally named the section "March 2110". Just so you know. =) Brambleclawx 00:52, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I didn't see it in the diff I looked at. No biggie, though; Huggle leaves the warnings automatically. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Never mind, I checked the history, and the guy was actually vandalising his own talk by changing the date. I was pretty sure you used Huggle, and I was just surprised to see what looked like a mistake by Huggle, but obviously wasn't. Brambleclawx 01:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I've seen very strange edits while using Huggle, so you never know. Please let me know if you see anything that raises your suspicions. It's an automated tool and it's not infallible. Not to mention operator error :) Tiderolls 01:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Kate4ever11

I see you have put 3 vandalism warnings on this user's talk page, and would like to inform you that she has created the page Kaitlyn_Moon if it is of any use to you. -- ..::Abb 615::.. 01:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your polite message. That article has been tagged for speedy deletion so I'm thinking it may not be with us long. Regards Tiderolls 01:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Tide rolls. You have new messages at Hamtechperson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit on Julia Alexandratou

The changes I made in Julia Alexandratou page has references and its not vandalism, please revert the changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mental gr (talk • contribs) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I will strike the message I left on your user talk but I will not revert my reversion. I do not believe this content needs to be in the article. I will not, however, edit war over the content. If you feel the content belongs in the article then add it your self. Regards Tiderolls 00:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

So if I edit the article again wont a bot revert it? Also Im curious, why do u think that the news of a sex tape of a celebrity doesnt belong in their page since most famous celebrities that have made sex tapes have it posted in their page? Thanks in advance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mental gr (talk • contribs) 00:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I cannot predict the actions of other editors (or bots). Wikipedia is not a forum for sensationalism. If the subject is notable due to some controversy that would be different. Also, I have no idea whether the source you cite would be considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. Regards Tiderolls 00:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. Well the particular event did somewhat of a buzz in greek media, which why I thought its worth mentioning. About the source, its the company that released the dvd so I would guess its pretty reliable. Finally if I could ask how I can avoid automatic reverses by bots. Thangs again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mental gr (talk • contribs) 00:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

If you would engage other editors on the article talk page or contact knowledgable editors at the biography project, you could gather input on the weight of the specific incident as it applies to the person's bio. Please understand that biographies of living persons are subject to rigid and strictly enforced rules for obvious reasons. As to avoiding bots, I can offer little advice as I am no expert in their operation. I do appreciate your patient and polite messages and hope that I have not adversely influenced your experience on Wikipedia. Thanks Tiderolls 01:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

I beat you! Thanks for reverting that guy's vandalism on my userpage also. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome and thanks for the reversion here. See ya 'round :) Tiderolls 00:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Dream Team

I didn't do that Dream Team edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.9.104 (talk) 21:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Registering an account would prevent you from getting messages that are meant for someone else. Tiderolls 23:58, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Apology

SOrry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.11.38.8 (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for revert, but I do feel better "My first user page Vandalism" Increment Vandalism userbox from 0 to +1 thanx again Mlpearc MESSAGE 01:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Not to worry, the novelty will wear off eventually :) Tiderolls 01:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Page move "Ancient Pueblo Peoples" -> "Anasazi"

Since you just edited the article, could you please leave a comment on Talk:Ancient Pueblo Peoples#Requested move? Thanks. --bender235 (talk) 11:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Whoo

Good work on the Zionism page. It's a shame that guy survived for so long. —Soap— 02:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah...Saturday night. I guess even admins have lives :) Tiderolls 02:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Just passing by...nice game against Auburn today, Tide. Now close your laptop and go watch Duke-UNC; let Soap take care of the vandals. Drmies (talk) 02:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure Soap's up to the job, but you know I like to pitch in :) I didn't watch the game...not that much into b-ball (except when Bama makes the Big Dance). Hope y'all are doing well...good to hear from you :) Tiderolls 02:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

This "guy" GraYoshi2x is vandalizing the dogo argentino page

Please help this page is coninually deleted or edited with erroius info. --83.9.238.138 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.9.238.138 (talk) 02:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I can understand your frustration. Please engage the editor without using the term "vandal". Besides constituting an uncivil remark is it very unhelpful. Thanks Tiderolls 02:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

The topic "Eh"

The reason for my edit of this article is that the article itself is not true. I'm not sure if you read my whole edit, but I will fully admit to making it slightly synical. This article does not depict the truth at all and the references given are mockeries and intend for comedic purposes. This is a Stereotyped article and should not even be allowed on Wikipedia at all, regardless of the cause. It is a mockery of Canadians and other Nationalities. Simply the only thing that this article should state about any English speaking nationality is that the interpeted word "eh" is actually the word "hey" and that the pronounciation of the "H" is muffled in with the rest of the word. My personal request is that this whole article either be removed from Wikipedia as it has no bearing, or simply changed to include that "eh" is simply "hey." And is often used to illicit a response from another person in the conversation. Thank you. MrRipperKing (talk) 04:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for coming here to discuss your edits. I reverted your edit because it was commentary and original research. Wikipedia is not a forum but a collection of facts supported by secondary sources. If you're interested here are the relevant links to the applicable policies and guidelines: WP:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Citing sources. Also, if you have concerns regarding article content or ideas on article improvement, it's preferable to engage editors on the article's talk page to develop and/or gage consensus on your ideas. Regards Tiderolls 04:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Mexico City

Hi Tide rolls, I've removed my warning message re: Mexico City from this users talkpage as on reflection I feel their edits were likely good faith, rather than vandalism. I'm not sure if may also want to review your message.

Kind Regards -- Marek.69 ^talk 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I believe that you are correct so I have striken my message on that page. I feel the edit is misplaced and I doubt its relevancy in general, but I agree that it was not a bad faith edit. I appreciate your letting me know about the situation. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Tide rolls, my sentiments also :-) Kind Regards -- Marek.69 ^talk 04:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

My userpage

Ta. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Anytime. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Page protection

Hi, Tide Rolls. An editor has requested to move protect your userpage and talk page after the page move vandalism yesterday. It's your page, so would you like it to be indefinitely move protected, or would you rather leave it as it is? ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 01:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Chamal. Thanks for the concern. I don't think one incident would warrant protection. However, if you believe I'm overlooking factors that would indicate protection is necessary I'd be interested in hearing more. Feel free to e-mail me if there are beansy concerns. Thanks Tiderolls 05:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Nah, I wouldn't have gone for protection either if it was my page. I was just checking if you'd want it, since somebody had requested it at WP:RFPP. Happy editing then :) ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 06:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

• Point 26 of WP:OWB states that: "If a vandal insults you, it is a reliable indicator that you are doing something right." Cheers~! --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 06:58, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

hilary duff discography

the only reason why i split the paragarphy was because teh info of her discography is diffrent from the biography, & cause the linbes overlapeped —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alxknight (talk • contribs) 00:01, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

US Census 2010 link

the link went to an empty page and only gives the statement a false sense of legitimacy by having a reference that no longer exists —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.72.191 (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear Tidey rolls,

I believev Newton South High School has recently changed their school colors to red from blue to better represent an African Lion. As a former Alum of NSHS I feel that crimson red is a more suitable color.

Much Love, 69.0009.0909Love —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.66.80 (talk) 00:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

very very sorry

i am very sorry for my actions please forgive me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.181.164 (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

hey

it has come to my attention that you have been reverting my constructive and factual comments, please halt all vandalism to my revisions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.138.3.117 (talk) 01:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

ATTENTION

it has come to my attention that you have been reverting my completely constructive and factual revisions. halt your vandalism immediately. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.138.3.117 (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hi,excuse me,would you happen to be the person who is taking down my Choc-A-Boxx article?

If so,I can inform you,all information on that page is real information. I got some old papers and stuff from the WEA Records company about Choc-A-Boxx,and some other info from other websites,so I do know that all information is 100% true. Please,do not remove my article. I only write true articles,I would never write a fake.

If it isn't you,but you may know who is deleting it,please stop the deletation. I will do my best to inprove that article,the reason you can't find much on them is because they weren't out for long and didn't release much outside of Europe.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kablam154 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I reverted this edit because it contained commentary that was more appropriate for a talk page, not the article's mainspace. In reverting I replaced a CSD tag that you had removed. I really don't have an opinion on the article (yet), but you are not to remove the CSD tags. An administrator will examine the circumstances and respond. If you want your article to avoid deletion I would advise you to go to the article's talk page and make your case for retention. Thanks Tiderolls 01:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Pacific Southwest Airlines

Why was my edit reverted. I feel that it doesn't belong on that page.76.235.78.29 (talk) 02:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

What does "Proxy-Connection: keep-alive + Cache-Control: max-age=0" mean? Tiderolls 02:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I will edit the page again and make sure that it is not there after I'm finished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.78.29 (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

It would also be helpful if you would include an edit summary so that other editors would be able to see why you are making the particular edit. Thanks Tiderolls 02:41, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

The Proxy blah-blah-blah was a glitch with Firefox.76.235.78.29 (talk) 02:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for that info. Tiderolls 02:42, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Tide ?

Tide if I stuck my nose in something you were doing sorry Mlpearc MESSAGE 02:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I saw what look looked like a vandal hit so I undid it Mlpearc MESSAGE 02:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

If you did I missed it :) No worries Tiderolls 02:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I trust you, Mlpearc. If it was something that needed attention I'm sure you took care of it. See ya 'round Tiderolls 03:01, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the cleanup of my page. You fixed it before I even knew about it. The tide rolls quickly... Bento00 (talk) 22:35, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Always willing to help. Thanks for letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

One more thing: I've been wanting to organize my talk page introduction, and I hope you don't mind that I lifted the code from yours, and just changed a few things, as any good plagiarist would. If it's a problem, let me know. Bento00 (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem...I've borrowed most of it from others' pages myself :) Tiderolls 23:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I just noticed where your "borrowed" link goes to. Very clever. Bento00 (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

You do ...

Good work. Thanks. BTW, given your interest in flags, did you ever glance at the Allahu Akhbar article? The section on flags may interest you. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. And thanks for the link...I'm checking it out now. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:50, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing. (I should also mention -- the article has been a vandal-magnet).--Epeefleche (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

I've watchlisted it as well. Tiderolls 23:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Cool!--Epeefleche (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

And every time I check your contributions you are always fighting vandalism with huggle. I already awarded you an anti-vandalism barnstar in 2009 which is the reason why I am not using a barnstar, but I might give you The Atlas Award. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 00:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

We do what we can. If I could write articles or design bots, I wouldn't be huggling. Thankfully, there are lots of tasks and we can take our pick. Hope you've been well, 12/21/12Freak...good to see ya Tiderolls 00:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Because I Wanted To Report My Block Request To The Appropriate Source

That is why I erased my complaints and put them on the uncivil wikiquettes page.Dr real (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010 Lahore bombings

While the rest of Solomaxwell's edits are vandalism, this looks correct so I've undone your reversion. If I made a mistake, please let me know. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:12, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I saw two dates listed and pulled the trigger. I guess one could say there were four bombings since the first listed on the twelfth was actually two guys that exploded at separate times. But, I won't quibble over the numbers. Good call...thanks for the info. Tiderolls 04:17, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Ides of March reversion

Please explain your reversion of the edit on Ides of March. The edit was done in accordance with WP:EL: Wikipedia articles may include links to web pages outside Wikipedia, but they should not normally be used in the body of an article. Please explain why you felt this was "unconstructive". 67.160.71.165 (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I fixated on "toga run" and missed the link removel. Apologies. I've undone my reversion. Thanks for coming here to bring this to my attention. Tiderolls 05:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Good catch

Nice catch on the vandalism on the EverQuest article

Alvincura (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the recognition. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Nice catch on my userpage too! Thanks! The Thing // Talk // Contribs 23:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

You've done the same for me. I owe you about three dozen more :) Tiderolls 23:56, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Heh. Oh btw, congrats on breaking 100,000 edits. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 23:57, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I knew I was close. Now, time to go to work on another year's work :) Tiderolls 00:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Opinion

I entirely disagree, how is it that he is allowed to have a page in an encyclopedia talking about himself contributing nothing. In fact I think it is entirely wrong that wikipedia takes this stance. I have seen articles deleted left and right and I think you guys need to really look in the mirror. My edit was not a mistake, it was feedback on the absurdity of wikipedia's policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.186.178.171 (talk) 23:59, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm gonna assume for one post that you're not trolling and attempt to explain your error. You appear to be "protesting" against some "wrong" or "injustice". Protests are not really recognized on Wikipedia. Different opinions are encouraged and open discourse is valued. However, railing against wrongs (real or percieved) is not looked upon with much favor. So, you're kind of wasting your time. It's your time to waste, of course, but the wasting of volunteers' time is very bad form. I would advise you to find another direction in which to aim your energies or your time here will be short and very unfullfilling. Entirely your call. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 00:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

You might be interested in reading the comments made by this IP on TTTSNB's talk and my talk. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ msg • changes) 00:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Obviously this user is not interested in "getting it". I was hoping for a different outcome, but I feel I am in store for disapppointment. I will hold out hope but I will not be responding to this individual until their outlook has changed somewhat. See ya 'round, NSD Tiderolls 00:23, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Tide rolls, for reverting the vandalism on my talk page from the IP who started this thread. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Always willing to help out, Eagles. Thanks for letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

WHY?

what did i do wrong? i'm just trying to educate people of the great 34th grandmaster of the togakure-ryu? why hush my gig, man? if i was chillin at your pad, id mellow out, so don't tax my gig so hardcore, cruster. please respond ~Lanky Kong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.245.59 (talk) 00:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Nah. Tiderolls 00:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

@71.237.245.59: You vandalized Masaaki Hatsumi ‎by replacing the contents of the page with something else (at least on your last edit to that page). Wikipedia does not allow vandalism and is reverted in only seconds. December21st2012Freak ^{Happy St. Patrick's Day!} 00:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Tide the user eagle 247 is trying to block me from contesting the behavior of him and cirt. Please respond. I am dead serious here, I have been trying all evening to start a dialogue and instead am being constantly reverted and harassed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.4.128.12 (talk) 01:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Dude, please look at the user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:70.186.178.171

Been trying to talk to you and eagle247 keeps deleting my posts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.4.128.12 (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Gunz: The Duel edit

Hello Tide Rolls,

I am very upset over this warning and roll back of my edit on Gunz: The Duel.

I am a very big fan of this game and also my 2 sons. My daughter also played it but what I said in the edit is exactly what happened to her, leading to her suicide on the 17th of October on 2006.

Please, leave the edit there as a warning to other Gunz loving parents.

Regards, Omgitshugo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omgitshugo (talk • contribs) 01:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: placeholders

I went and blocked him. Just keep an eye on those types of pages (JD Sumner, etc.) and warn/block any IPs doing that, since he seems to be dynamic. I wouldn't bother with ANI as there are a couple users out there really adamant, for some reason, about keeping them in. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick action and taking the time to let me know. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for helping to revert the massive flood of 4chan vandalism on my userpage, as well as the revert earlier in the day. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 12:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Belated thanks for the recognition. My tardiness does not reflect the importance I place on your opinion. See ya 'round Tiderolls 16:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Dont you just love the vandals?

ah thanks for reverting my page for me..even though i had just pulled it up on huggle! :-) ah fighting crime is fun. Evenios (talk) 02:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Forgive me for butting on on your page, but I wanted to make sure that user got a "no personal attacks" warning. Hopefully it will gain their attention. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Also, thanks for reverting the defacing of my page :) Tiderolls 02:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

since i got rollback permission i have been using huggle as a mean lean fightin machine! 30 more edits and i can apply for the other tool Wikipedia program i forgot the name :-p wheee!

02:59, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I admire your enthusiasm. You might find this amusing and informative. Tiderolls 03:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Patriot movement article - violation of neutrality

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_movement This article is bogus and filled with hearsay and lies. Wiki should review the content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abigail.adamsLives (talk • contribs) 02:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for coming here to discuss this situation. There are processes in place to deal with your concerns. Defacing the article is not one of them. If you have concerns regarding article content you can engage editors at the article's talk page. In more extreme situations you also have the option of filing a request for comment. I hope this helps. Tiderolls 02:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

warning removed

Oops in my haste i now realize looking back on his page edit indeed the warning was not called for so i went back and removed it myself with an apology thanks! :-) Evenios (talk) 07:35, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

also you are good on your Vandal patrols too! Many times when i saw a edit i was about to revert I've seen you have beat me too it! Good work! its either you or Cluebot you know "winks" Evenios (talk) 07:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Evenios...thanks for taking that second look. Believe me, I do understand how difficult it can be when the edits are occurring rapidly. It's important, though, that one is willing to revisit their actions...just look at the posts on this page...I've been there :) Tiderolls 17:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

It's Barnstar Time!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your work last night reverting the vandalism on child and writer especially. I've noticed the immense amount of anti-vandal work that you do on Wikipedia, many times I'm on Huggle and gone to reverse vandalism only to find I've been beaten to it by either you or Cluebot. Keep up the good work! 5 albert square (talk) 13:15, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, 5 albert square...true praise coming from a contributor with your credentials. See ya 'round Tiderolls 16:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for catching this edit and reverting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm very sure you've done the same for me, so I owe you :) Tiderolls 16:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate the help keeping my talk tidy. Also, it's good seeing you active at recent changes...you save me a lot of work :) Tiderolls 16:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

And it is a pleasure to keep your talk page clean - The more talk page vandalism a you attract the better. After all, it signals your doing a great job (And it keeps the article space clean at the same time). Other then that, the "Less Work" feeling is completely mutual; More patrols is always better. :) Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

.."keeps the article space clean..." Damn good point! Tiderolls 17:36, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Tide rolls. You have new messages at Hamtechperson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hamtechperson 17:58, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

cut the shit

I'm trying to RV the vandals.

And you're mucking it up royaly. Modify your approach. Thanks Tiderolls 03:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits to oak hill high school maine

I am a student of Oak Hill High School, in Wales, Maine, and I would like to attest to the recent edits you have reverted. We are in fact allowed to drive our go karts to school and do partake in transporting ourselves between classes via our go karts. We also do have summer classes entitled "Trash Picking" (A play on words from the Raider mascot) "Overachieving" (Becoming a better student) and also "Sitting" (Sitting and Care 101, a life skills class based around babysitting.) So I believe that your reverts were in fact incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.254.105.149 (talk) 01:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Attest away. Before your content may be added, however, you will have to provide reliable sources and cite them properly. One's personal experience and observation are not used as sourcing for facts presented in this encyclopedia. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 01:11, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you...

... for clearing the vandalism at my User page. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Glad to be of service. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Me too

I also appreciate your swift action. Thanks very much. Curious about something: how did you find out so fast my page was vandalized? ScottyBerg (talk) 02:00, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome and thanks for letting me know you didn't mind me butting in. As for your question, I use an automated tool. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Interesting! Might be a way I can contribute to Wikipedia myself. Thanks again. ScottyBerg (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

I hope you look into it. We always need conscientious contributors. Tiderolls 02:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it looks like something I might want to do. Got to get rollback rights first I see. ScottyBerg (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it's not difficult. Establish youself by reverting some vandalism and familiarize yourself with the core policies. You shouldn't have much trouble. Let me know if you have any questions. I'll help where I can. Regards Tiderolls 02:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Good idea. I haven't really contributed too much, as the articles in my area of expertise are already in a high state of development. But this is one area where I might be able to help. ScottyBerg (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

I have come across many opportunities to tweak and fix articles while watching recent changes. As you revert vandalism you will see other things about many articles that will need to be addressed that are outside the realm of vandalism. (formatting, citations that need to be added or added properly, broken image names, etc.). That's where learning the core policies comes into play. You will need to be able to recognize problems and be able to address them without violating Wikipedia's standards yourself. Regards Tiderolls 19:45, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I've actually been reading up on policies in the context of one of the more controversial subject areas at Wikipedia, where I've commented but lack the technical expertise to edit. So happens I've started looking at the recent changes but usually you Hugglers get there before me! I found the vandalism on TriBeCa because that's already on my watchlist. But I think I may get one of the other tools I read about that don't require rollback rights. I'll let you know how it goes. ScottyBerg (talk) 21:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. Lao-tzu Tiderolls 23:08, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits to Oak Hill High School

I, along with my fellow colleague, attest you reverting our recent edits. Do you even have any affiliation with Oak Hill? Because if you did, you would know that there are in fact students hailing from our lunar satalite, the moon. Also, for an article about Oak Hill, I felt it lacked the school's name in many sentences, so simply tried to inform people that all of these activities were associated with Oak Hill, and not another school in the area. I am simply trying to enhance the school's image, and you are seriously impeding my ability to do so. Next time you delete someone else's work, do some research first. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.253.8.55 (talk) 02:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

i am sorry

I am sorry, i did not intend to do anything wrong. Is this an acceptable update for the Caesar and Hell MI sites?

In 2005 Mike Hickey Owner of The Damsite Inn a bar in Hell Michigan, created a Bottled Bloody Caesar Mixer. He named it Smitty's Bloody Caesar From Hell Michigan. Smitty Sauces & Seasonings From Hell Michigan It is still available today and well known as one of the best mixes around. Smitty's has all of the elements of the great flavors you expect to taste in a Bloody Caesar with a mildly spicy taste. The Caesar Cocktail is still the #1 drink of choice in Canada. It is becoming Quite popular in the US also.

Thank you, Andrea--Smittysauces (talk) 02:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Barek left a link on your talk page explaining the reason your content was being reverted. You really need to follow this link and read the policy. The fact that you continued to add the content after being warned is disruptive. If you feel that your content does not go against policy, please contact other editors on the talk pages of the articles or on the policy's talk page. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 03:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Headphones

I wish to defend my deletion of the claim that Headphones are also called earphones. This is not the case; in the music world it is very well established that earphones and headphones are very different music listening devices and I simply wished to correct a statement that suggested otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.128.140 (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

If "it is very well established" then you should not have any trouble providing reliable sources for this position and citing them properly. However, the reason I reverted your edits was due to the fact that the edits were marring the layout of the article and appeared vandalistic. I had no major issue with the content of your edits. Having listened to your reasoning I see no actual need for the content to be added but I will not edit war to keep the content out of the article. Please understand that your edits are visible to all editors and are subject to alteration and deletion. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 02:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

burton

have u ever been to burton statues if you had you would probably realise that my edit was infact correct as it is riddled with gangs stabbing each other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.163.79 (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Here's something you might find informative. Regards Tiderolls 02:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

CSD

Are you sure about Homo swarm? It's certainly a fertile mine of double entendre, but Dike swarm is perfectly fine, and the term "homologous" is valid. It should be renamed using the correct term and maybe merged, and Google shows no hits, but I wouldn't reject it out of hand as a hoax, despite the nomenclature. Needs an actual source, obviously.Acroterion _(talk) 02:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to answer so late...real life concerns. I wasn't 100% sure when I tagged the article, but I was basing my action on the user's citation. Their link did not reference "homo" at all....and the "homologous" was given as an alternative. Dike swarm has existed since 2008 with no mention of a "homologous" and this was the user's very first edit. I will plead a mea culpa to acting quickly, but I was sure enough to pull the trigger. I hope this answers your concerns. See ya 'round Tiderolls 04:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I now see that the deletion was handled as a "test" rather than a "hoax". Maybe my tag was a bit harsh and I would offer a sincere apology to the article creator if a source surfaces. If the creator had come here I would've certainly entertained any discussion they offered. Regards Tiderolls 04:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I think somebody was having a little geological fun with us - I imagine a dike swarm can be homologous, and I imagine there's a very old joke about it all. If anybody wants to add sourced content concerning homologous dike swarms to dike swarm, they can do so. We don't have a pun tag, so G3 tends to be the default. No problems, I was puled too. Acroterion _(talk) 13:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Greetings / Do you use Twinkle?

Hello! Well, first of all, it's nice to see you again. One of the comments that I have to make is all in an e-mail that I will zap to you soon. Second, I was just wondering if you were ever interested in using WP:TWINKLE. It's a gadget similar to Huggle that a lot of users (and rollbackers) use, including myself. There is the tasks of reverting vandalism & reporting it, tagging new pages for CSD, reporting users, etc. Since you are a bit notable for your Huggleness, I was wondering if you would give it a try! :-) Have a good night.

Side note -- Twinkle doesn't work on Internet Explorer. It will function on Firefox, Safari, and other browsers. Schfifty3 03:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Huggle is actually faster than twinkle, I used to have twinkle in July/August, 2009 but I got the rollback right later in August which is when I started using huggle. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 04:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Good to see you as well, Schfifty. I may give TW a try some day, but it will mean a browser download for me as I use IE. I've been using HG so long that I am used to its quirks and jerks. Sometimes it's best to choose the devil one knows :) Thanks for the feedback 12/21/12Freak...good info. Tiderolls 04:29, 27 March 2010 (UTC) I didn't know there was a template for talk-page-stalking...lol

Yeah, there's always the necessary time to wait before trying something new. On the subject of browsers, I would personally prefer to use Firefox b.c. it has nifty add-ons and no slow tab loading. :) Schfifty3 04:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh BTW, did you receive that email I sent? Schfifty3 04:46, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes....read and answered. Tiderolls 05:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

You provided me with multiple links to the sandbox.

Excuse me, but why did you direct me to the sandbox?

My edits were clearly not test edits, so your linking me to the sandbox was an incorrect and inappropriate course of action.

If you do not like my edits, that's fine. But I am letting you know that linking to the sandbox is a wholly incorrect action, because I am clearly not trying to make test edits.

Linking to the sandbox may cause great amusement and a few chuckles for yourself and others, but it is an ad hominem attack and it is worthless to proceedings.

If the edits were not genuine and were vandalism, that would also be an incorrect time to link the person to the sandbox.

You may consider the edits so ridiculous that you cannot help but want to offend them. If so, I suggest you condemn the edits in an honest way and try to keep an open mind about how it may be you yourself and perhaps others who have it all wrong.

So I am making a request to not link genuine edits to the sandbox again, even though many other people do it when they see edits they greatly dislike. Thanks for your consideration. 93.95.81.1 (talk) 16:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

I kind of see the point you are attempting to make. Unfortunately, this is the incorrect forum to address your !issue. As I do not have any real hope that your position will gain traction, I will not waste your time by directing you to more appropriate venues. I will offer that the word choice you take issue with is most likely rooted in the assumption of good faith and I would wager that this fact is already known to you. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 16:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

New user here

Hi. I am new to Wikipedia, so please do not flame me. Were my websites deemed unnecessary? I believe a robot undid my edits. - thomas123wooden123 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas123wooden123 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

This is not "flame", it is a templated information notice. I left that message on your talk page after reverting this edit. Honestly, I have no opinion on the link you added to that article; the multiple misspellings you introduced distracted me from reading the complete edit. That's the risk one runs when adding gibberish to articles. It may not have been your intent to add gibberish and that's the reason the message I left references "unconstructive". I hope this answers your concerns. Regards Tiderolls 23:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Please block...

I see that you have warned BillyBlazes. He is going to vandalizm and I want you to block him so we can protect Wikipedia. BjörnBergman 19:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree that this user is not here to be constructive. I am not, however, an administrator so I cannot block the user. In addition there is a process that must be followed before a block can be executed. Not to worry, though, this user is making it plain that they will be blocked soon. Thanks for your concern. See ya 'round Tiderolls 19:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Sir, I am on the Consignio Accademico of the Ateneo Veneto and updating the website. Could you kindly let me know your affiliation and why you are interfering? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.32.114 (talk) 22:35, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Generally you don't 'update' an article by deleting half or all of it. You're taking the piss and your next edit will get you reported. HalfShadow 22:39, 28 March 2010 (UTC)