User talk:TheCatalyst31/Archive 13

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Megalibrarygirl in topic A New Year With Women in Red!

Illinois edit

Hi-the Padua, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 13:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Virginia edit

Hi-the Wyche, Virginia article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 23:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Illinois edit

Hi-the Gillum, Illinois and the Yuton, Illinois articles nneed info boxes-many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Illinois edit

Hi-the Kerrick, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Illinois edit

Hi-the Sabina, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Illinois edit

Hi-the Fletcher, Illinois article needs ab info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

February with Women in Red edit

 
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155


Happy Valentine's Day from all of us at Women in Red.

Online events:

 


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

South Carolina edit

Hi-the Red Bluff, South Carolina article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 23:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Florida edit

Hi-the Estiffanulga, Florida article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:20, 22 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159


Happy Women's History Month from all of us at Women in Red.

 
 
 

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Arkansas edit

hi-the Tokalon, Arkansas article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

That bundled AfD is clearly contrary to WP:BUNDLE. Not sure how to get a procedural close. The nominator can then do each AfD separately if they choose. Thoughts? Magnolia677 (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not entirely sure either. Presumably we'd want to get an uninvolved admin (which I'm obviously not) to weigh in, but short of escalating this to a noticeboard, there's not an obvious way to do that. I know a few admins who have been aware of these sorts of mass nominations in the past, but at the rate these nominations are going, reaching out to them might be seen as canvassing. For what it's worth, this wouldn't be the first recent mass nomination of communities to be closed for procedural reasons, but the nominator withdrew in that case; this time, the nominator isn't even the one who bundled the articles, and the article that was originally nominated isn't actually notable so there's no reason to close that. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 15:59, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pyke, Idaho for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pyke, Idaho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pyke, Idaho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 03:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Beer Bottle Crossing, Idaho for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beer Bottle Crossing, Idaho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer Bottle Crossing, Idaho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you don't want to be bothered by these notices, just say so and I'll stop. When I omitted them (because the person was supposedly retired) I got nagged at length. Mangoe (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
If you get a moment have a look at Parks Place, Mississippi. It is unique because it has been marked by GNIS as "historic", which means someone had to scrutinize the entry to be sure it's not only a populated place, but an abandoned populated place. A second source to support the existence of this ghost town was a map showing the place. This AfD seems to suggest that GNIS is completely unreliable as a source. I think I may broadcast this AfD to get a wider input. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Mangoe: Please do keep notifying me - partly because I want to rescue articles like this if I can, partly since I want to pay attention to how these AfDs turn out for future reference. As I mentioned in one of the AfDs, my personal standards for when to create these articles have changed through the years, and I want to make sure they're in line with the community.
@Magnolia677:} I'll take a look at Parks Place. Though I'll want to dig around for sources there, since I've seen cases of the GNIS marking plantations and the like as populated places before. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 03:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Tennessee edit

Hi-the New River, Tennessee article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shiloh Church, Maryland for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiloh Church, Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiloh Church, Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 22:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Discovery, St. Mary's County, Maryland for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovery, St. Mary's County, Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Discovery, St. Mary's County, Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 22:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chaney Ranch, California for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaney Ranch, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaney Ranch, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lightburst (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Three V Crossing, North Dakota for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three V Crossing, North Dakota is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three V Crossing, North Dakota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 18:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dabney Estates, Virginia for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabney Estates, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dabney Estates, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 20:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Midnight Thicket, Delaware for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midnight Thicket, Delaware is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Thicket, Delaware until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 01:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Hi-Thank You for helping with the unincorporated communities articles and other articles also. I am sad that some of the unincorporated communities articles were deleted for different reasons. I just signed up with the Women In Red project. For the last few years I help with articles involving women who served in public office in the United States. Some examples: Mary Beattie, A. Lucille Matarese, Kelly Timilty, and Arlene Stringer-Cuevas. Thank you for your service and work with Wikipedia-RFD (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you too! I'm also a member of Women in Red, and it's always good to see new members. (I should write more biographies of women - I don't write that many biographies to begin with, so I haven't been doing much for the project lately, but it's good to have an excuse to fix that.) TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 12:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Parker Junction, California for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parker Junction, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Junction, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 00:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank You!!! edit

I appreciate you comments at the AFD. -- Dolotta (talk) 21:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Uf" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uf. Since you had some involvement with the Uf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166


May offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Leaving edit

BYE BYECoal town guy (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice edit

 

Hi TheCatalyst31, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Deletion of North Battle Mountain, Nevada edit

Nomination of North Battle Mountain, Nevada for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Battle Mountain, Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Battle Mountain, Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cxbrx (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Iowa edit

Hi-the Troy, Iowa article needs an infobox-many thanks-RFD (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

National parks edit

Hello, and thank you again for your help. I have been trying to add missing properties into NRHP listings by myself, eventually. Here, here, here, here and here. If you are fine with everything, I guess I'll be good enough to keep going without further assistance! Whatever, I'd still like someone else to create the list and template for Redwood National Park, which should include the six entries found within Catégorie:Registre national des lieux historiques dans le parc national de Redwood plus I guess Old Requa and Prairie Creek Fish Hatchery, which I believe are out of the legal boundaries of the park but once again deeply associated with it – just like Backus-Marblemount Ranger Station House No. 1010 and others that you've keeped in National Register of Historic Places listings in North Cascades National Park. Would you mind trying that? Two counties are involved so the situation for Redwood NP is not to be compared with the one of Crater Lake National Park. Thierry Caro (talk) 00:39, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The new additions look good to me. If you get tired of updating the listing numbers manually, there's a user script that can do it for you after you add the listing. I'll make a list for Redwood when I get the chance. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 01:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Redwood is done. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 03:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much. Thierry Caro (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

August 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Crestline, Nevada for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crestline, Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crestline, Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 08:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Prince Welf Ernst of Hanover redirects edit

You recently deleted Prince Welf Ernst of Hanover. The page has the following redirects, Welf of Hanover, Prince Welf of Hanover, and Vimalkirti that also need to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:B610:40F8:9318:5ED5:A6C4 (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Done, thanks for reminding me. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 16:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

if it is not too late I would like to delete a ANI edit

hallo, I am not sure if u r the right person to ask to or if it is the best thing to do. I started this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#serious_issue_with_another_user and now I would like, if it is appropriate and possible delete it. not because I don't think I am right but because my opponent has called all the people I had a controversy with and now I look like a villein and I fear I will be blocked (boomerang).

just to be 100% honest the same day I started this ANI I lost the grip and insulted and swear to Gleeanon409. I got a warning because of that so I deleted the messages. I am sorry I did it but this is what Gleeanon409 does, he is getting on my nerve to make me react so he can make me kick out of wikipedia.

I know I will never win that discussion as they keep dragging me away from the real and only reason I started it: since my stats proves I am not making disruptive AFD nominations then Gleeanon409 should stop accusing me of that in every discussions we meet. argue the nominated article not the nominator. but, as u can see, Gleeanon409 pinged a lot of people he knew that for one reason or another have a problem with me (when u make delete more than 20 porn bio u have a lot of people who don't like u) so now I am accused of mostly anything and I don't want to defend myself any longer. English is not my mother tongue so to me comunicate precisely and effectively can be hard.

thank you for listening and I will appreciate if u can help. --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

With only a quick review of the situation, can't you just withdraw your issue at ANI and walk away? If the stress is really getting to you, then you could avoid the other person (at least for a while) so you can calm down. Perhaps reading Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot might help you. (Talk page stalker) Royalbroil 20:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I left a more detailed comment at AlejandroLeloirRey's talk page, but in short, the discussion has turned to an examination of his behavior, and withdrawing the original issue wouldn't allow him to shut down that discussion. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 20:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Do you have any other information on the Sommerheim park site? Im trying to find more info about points and objects found there and have found no sources from original excavation nor susbsequent investigations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LarsTheFirst (talkcontribs) 18:59, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Citation Barnstar
Thank you for teaching me about the library and linking those sources! Bgrus22 (talk) 22:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mississippi edit

Hi the Caseyville, Mississippi and Norfield, Mississippi aricles need maps-Many thanks-

September Women in Red edithons edit

 
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Illinois edit

Hi-the Kernan, Illinois article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

October editathons from Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest! edit

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Nomination of Opportunity Farms, Missouri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opportunity Farms, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opportunity Farms, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 20:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Blue Branch, Missouri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Branch, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Branch, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 20:35, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hilda, Benton County, Missouri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilda, Benton County, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilda, Benton County, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 20:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Windsor Junction, Missouri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Windsor Junction, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windsor Junction, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 21:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cole Camp Junction, Missouri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cole Camp Junction, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Camp Junction, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 21:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Walkers Corner, Missouri for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walkers Corner, Missouri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walkers Corner, Missouri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 01:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Knob Lick, Estill County, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knob Lick, Estill County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knob Lick, Estill County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 02:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Clem, West Virginia for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clem, West Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clem, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kentucky/Pennsylvania edit

Hi-the McBrayer, Kentucky and West Hill, Pennsylvania articles need info boxes-many thanks-RFD (talk) 15:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

November edith-a-thons from Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November! edit

 

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Utah edit

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_United_States/Requested_Articles#Cities_and_towns I saw you made some of these towns and I was wondering if you could help finish them off, thanks Bigmike2346 (talk) 21:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was planning to finish off more of those when I got the chance. I'm not sure I'll do all of them, since some of the places don't seem to have much of anything left there, but I'll definitely be doing more. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 22:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you don’t mind could you also do the Utah Municipal Courts article Bigmike2346 (talk) 23:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

That one's a little more out of my wheelhouse, since I don't have any particular connection to Utah and don't often write about court systems, so I probably won't be able to do that one. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 23:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you know of any important US attorneys of football coaches that need articles let me know because that’s what I’m good at Bigmike2346 (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rogers, Logan County, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rogers, Logan County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rogers, Logan County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 16:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hilltop, Logan County, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilltop, Logan County, Kentucky, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop, Logan County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

December with Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Needmore, Butler County, Kentucky edit

As you may have noticed, I've been trying to go through Kentucky to weed out some of the articles created on communities that aren't really there. I'm looking at this one, and I'm not sure if it's an actual community or not, but it's kinda hard to search for, given the common name. This is an annotated USGS listing from a guy named Rennick who went through Kentucky several decades ago (with Morehead State maybe?) cataloging most of the place names, and that's calling this Needmore (county code is 21031) as a locale, unless I got my lines mixed up. His directory for Butler County doesn't mention a Needmore. A newspapers.com search just brings up passing mentions for this one that I found, but there's quite a bit of noise for Needmore, Boyle County, Kentucky, which is definitely notable, I'd say. I don't want to nominate this one for deletion if there was something real here. Do you have any information I didn't come across? Hog Farm Bacon 16:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The context behind the Needmores is that another user asked me to create them several years ago. There are actually five places named Needmore, Kentucky (plus one renamed place), but a third user wrote articles on the other ones. From my own research, it looks like the ones in Ballard, Boyle, and Caldwell counties (and the renamed place) are definitely notable, and I was at least able to find evidence of people who lived in Owen, but I found close to nothing about the Needmore in Butler County. I have no objections to deleting it. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 18:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding. I'd already gone through Ballard and Caldwell counties and determined those Needmores are notable and the Boyle is definitely notable. The Owen County one is probably fine, too. Hog Farm Bacon 21:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Needmore, Butler County, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Needmore, Butler County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Needmore, Butler County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 04:59, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kirtley, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirtley, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirtley, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Caroline Mark Home edit

 

The article Caroline Mark Home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:GEOFEAT, article lacks significant in depth coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 00:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Caroline Mark Home for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Mark Home is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Mark Home until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~RAM (talk) 02:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hilltop, Grayson County, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilltop, Grayson County, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop, Grayson County, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 05:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pennsylvania edit

Hi-the Iselin, Pennsylvania article needs an info box-many thanks-RFD (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Moutardier, Kentucky for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moutardier, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moutardier, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 03:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Commonscat position edit

I noticed you've been adding {{commonscat}} to NRHP articles, which I appreciate. Per the advice at Template:Commons category, a few comments:

  • If the infobox is longer than the article text, or there isn't already an external links section, {{commonscat-inline}} under an external links heading is best. This helps avoid it being lost under a long infobox or causing whitespace in the references. New York Central Railroad Passenger and Freight Station is a good example of both of those.
  • It is preferable not to hardcode the Commons category name, as the template automatically uses Wikidata to make the link. This prevents the link from breaking in the event the Commons category is renamed.

Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

The first point makes sense; I usually default to not adding a new section if there isn't one, but you're right that the template gets lost more often than not in that case, so I'll start adding one. As for the second point, that's a good idea when everything's in Wikidata, though unfortunately that isn't always the case. (I suppose I could just link the two in that case, of course - I may just be jaded about Wikidata's data quality from all the mistagged Commons categories I've had to unlink.) TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 02:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

AddCommonsCatLinks edit

Hi - is your script working for you? I know Evad37 recently updated {{NRHP row}} based on some of my suggestions - is that breaking this script for everyone, is there something else, or is the problem just on my end? ɱ (talk) 00:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I just ran it on a couple of lists, and it seems to be working fine for me. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 14:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
How about at National Register of Historic Places listings in Columbus, Ohio, which uses the new wikidata ID parameter? ɱ (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's not just you, I'm seeing the issue there too. It probably is an issue with the new parameter. I'll look into what's going on. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 01:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
@: the problem was the row for Krumm House, which was using Template:NRHP row/sandbox; the regex that the Commons script uses to identify rows doesn't match the sandbox template. I swapped it out for the standard row template, since we probably shouldn't be using the sandbox template in mainspace in the first place. TheCatalyst31 ReactionCreation 03:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Good catch, was testing out coordinate and mapping options at the time, missed fixing that one somehow. Thanks! ɱ (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A New Year With Women in Red! edit

 
 
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply