Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave a message.

Nomination of Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Churchill, Renville County, Minnesota until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cornell, Modoc County, California edit

 

The article Cornell, Modoc County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location; seems to have just been a railroad waypoint. Passing mentions could be found: [1], but no significant coverage or information could be found. No mention in Cook's history of Modoc County: [2]. Without further information this site is a failure of WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kitson Kapiriel edit

 

The article Kitson Kapiriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability and fulfillment of the GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 20:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Black Butte, California edit

 

The article Black Butte, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a community, a non-notable railroad siding named for the nearby mountain of Black Butte, and the adjoining Black Butte Spring. No information found that wasn't about the railroad site, and no evidence was found that this was ever truly a community. It's hard to find information unambiguously about Black Butte (most coverage is of the mountain and surrounding area, or other California places with this name), making this article confusing as well as uninformative. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG without further information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Clear Creek, Siskiyou County, California edit

 

The article Clear Creek, Siskiyou County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. Little information found, although nondescript name makes it hard to find mentions that are unambiguously about this place. The cited sources (GNIS and a map) are sufficient for verifiability but not notability, and without further information this place fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Satellite view just shows two houses along a river.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Valerie, California edit

 

The article Valerie, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. No information found; not mentioned at all in either Holmes' (https://books.google.com/books?id=wm8UAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=riverside+county&newbks=0&hl=en&ovso=1#v=onepage&q=valerie&f=false]) or Lech's ([3]) histories of Riverside County. Satellite view shows a rural intersection with a gas station. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wadstrom, California edit

 

The article Wadstrom, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location; no evidence this was anything more than a railroad waypoint, and not a "community". Not one mention in three histories of Ventura County: [4], [5], [6]. Satellite view just shows an industrial area on the outskirts of Ventura. Cited sources are not sufficient for notability; being in GNIS or being on a railroad line do not confer notability. Glaring failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Honda, California edit

 

The article Honda, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable rail siding, not an "unincorporated community". See maps at [7]. Cited sources do not establish notability; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:56, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Largo Vista, California edit

 

The article Largo Vista, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this location has encyclopedic notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive edit

WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive
 

There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.

  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles cited.
  • Remember to tag your edit summary with [[WP:FEB24]], both to advertise the event and tally the points later using Edit Summary Search.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Editor experience invitation edit

Hi TheCatalyst31 :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Linwood, Iowa for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linwood, Iowa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linwood, Iowa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red February 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Springs, Los Angeles County, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red March 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Proposed deletion of Leahy, Washington edit

 

The article Leahy, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location; GNIS does not establish notability. Only mention of this place is a 1935 column describing the daily activities of several people "of Leahy": [8], which is a trivial mention. No other sources found. Satellite view of coordinates shows a rural intersection with two (2) buildings and two (2) trees. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:55, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dulah, California edit

 

The article Dulah, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable location. The article itself says Dulah was just a rail siding, which is not a recognized place per WP:GEOLAND. GNIS is not sufficient for notability, and the other two sources do not mention Dulah at all. No information found. Complete waste of bandwidth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Deadwood, Tuolumne County, California edit

 

The article Deadwood, Tuolumne County, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is factually incorrect. Look at the satellite image of the coordinates: [9]. Does this look like a "community" located on a logging railroad? No, it looks like two dirt tracks meeting in the middle of the forest, and zero other information could be found. GNIS and a place-names book are both considered unreliable for purposes of notability. Fails WP:V and WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Han Kum-ok edit

 

The article Han Kum-ok has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, nothing in English or Korean that I can find

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. toobigtokale (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Dulah, California" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Dulah, California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § Dulah, California until a consensus is reached. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red April 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply