Juliaaltagracia
|
|
Fair use rationale for File:Finalistas-1.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Finalistas-1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sasikiran (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
The requested information already inserted in the picture. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 04:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Concurso-trivia.JPG edit
Thanks for uploading File:Concurso-trivia.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Information inserted in the image as requested --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Talkback edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Miss RD edit
Okay. Pero porfavor dame los nombres de las representantes de cada ano. Yo lo organiso. Esta bien. Otra cosa es que el certamen era 1 ano temprano como pro ejemplo Miss RD 1981 fue Soraya, entiendes --MRDU08 (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Miss Republica Dominicana 1981 edit
No es cierto. Mira esto que sale en OGM-Central de Datos para el año 1981.
JOSEFINA CUELLO PRIMERA FINALISTA DEL CONCURSO NACIONAL DE BELLEZA, QUIEN VIAJARA MAÑANA A MIAMI, LUEGO A LONDRES, A REPRESENTAR A LA REPUBLICA DOMINICANA EN EL CONCURSO INTERNACIONAL DE MISS MUNDO 1981
Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00
CONCURSO DE BELLEZA ELIGE ESTA NOCHE SEÑORITA REPUBLICA DOMINICANA La señorita República Dominicana 1981-1982 será elegida esta noche durante la celebración del concurso Nacional de belleza organizado por el señor Ramón Darío Cruz. Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00
EL CARIBE. VIDA SOCIAL. EL PRESIDENTE ELOGIA LA ELECCION DE FINALISTA CONCURSO DE BELLEZA El Presidente Antonio Guzmán elogió ayer la selección de la señorita Josefina Cuello como candidata al reciente Concurso Nacional de Belleza, Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00
ELEGIRAN EL DÍA 19 DE MAYO MISS REPUBLICA DOMINCIANA La señorita República Dominicana 1981 será elegida el próximo día 19 en el Night Club La Fuente del Hotel Jaragua. Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00
REINA RD EXPONE VESTUARIO LUCIRA EN NY Lucía Veras, es la señorita República Dominicana que ya se encuenra en la ciudad de nueva york donde representará el país en el Concurso de Miss Universo a celebrarse este mes en aquella noche. Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00
LA SEÑORITA LUCIA PEÑA, ELEGIDA "MISS REPUBLICA DOMINICANA", MUESTRA DOS MODELOS DE LA DISEÑADORA GENARINA PEREZ DE FRANCO Y QUE LUCIRA DURANTE LA CELEBRACION DE CONCURSO MISS UNIVERSO EL PROXIMO DIA 20 DE ESTE MES EN LA CIUDAD DE NUEVA YORK.
Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00 --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 15:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
CONCURSO NACIONAL DE BELLEZA. ROMPE LA TRADICION Y SE VA A SANTIAGO. Con la participación de 19 candidatas representantes de la capital y del interior del país será celebrado esta noche el Concurso Nacional de Belleza que por primera vez tendrá por escenario la ciudad de Santiago.
¡ESTILO NUEVO!. HOY FINALIZA EL CONCURSO NACIONAL DE BELLEZA. 19 BELDADES EN BUSCA DE LA CORONA. Con gran entusiasmo se espera para esta noche la culminación del Concurso Nacional de Belleza, donde serán seleccionadas las representaciones dominicanas para los concursos Miss Universo, Miss Mundo, Miss América Latina, Miss Café y otros.
ESTILO NUEVO!. SEÑORITA CARMEN RITA PEREZ, LA NUEVA MISS REPUBLICA DOMINICANA.
Carmen Rita Pérez, joven nativa y representante de la ciudad de Santiago de los Caballeros,
TRAS LAS CORTINAS. Quiero felicitar a la gente de Santiago por el gran apoyo que le dieron al Concurso Nacional de Belleza celebrado el sábado en la sala de fiestas del Centro Español, a los ejecutivos de Rahintel y demás personas que tuvieron la idea de que este evento se Año : (1987) *** Precio artículo: $150.00 ARCHIVO DE ALIRO. SU MAJESTAD AMERICANA 1RA. 1927- La señorita Americana Franco, resultó triunfadora del certamen para elegir la reina del carnaval de Santiago de los Caballeros. La fiesta de coronación fue celebrada en los salones del Centro de Recreo el 27 de Febrero de 1927.
REINA DE BELLEZA -1927 La distinguida y bella señorita Americana Franco electa Reina del Club de la Juventud de Santiago de los Caballeros en 1927.
racia|talk]]) 21:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC) NA IMAGEN DE LA SOCIEDAD CAPITALEÑA: BEÑÑEZA Y ESPLENDOR DEL CARNAVAL DE BLANQUITA LOGROÑO Y SU REINADO EL Carnaval más grande y de mayor brillantez celebrado en la ciudad de Santo Domingo en los días del mes de febrero de 1928 resultó en ocasión del reinado de belleza de la señorita Blanca Logroño Cohén, ha sido considerado como el más espléndido en toda l
. REINADO DE 1928
Durante la Presidencia del general Horacio Vásquez, fue celebrado uno de los grandes reinados populares encabezados por la reina Blanquita Logroño. Durante el baile de coronación, aparece en la fotografiía, acompañado a una de las bellas princesar, el con
BELLEZAS DOMINICANAS 1928
La licenciada Isabel Tezanos, quien ha sido considerada una de las mujeres más bellas de la República Dominicana, en una fotografia del año 1962.
. BELLEZAS DEL PASADO
La señorita Camelia Rivas, electa Virreina del Carnaval celebrado en la ciudad de Santiago, el año 1928.
LA REINA DEL CARNAVAL DE 1928.
A sus casi 90 años, Blanca Logroño Cohén, la reina del carnaval de 1928, evoca los reinados que conjuraban el tedio, reafirmaban los abolegos y la aristocracia de la sociedad capitaleña.
CARNAVAL DE 1928
Durante el gobierno del presidente Horacio Vásquez Lajara, los reinados siguieron la tradición popular del pueblo dominicano. Esta fue una de las comparsar que debutaron por el "Club Unión", en el reinado que resultó triunfadora la señorita Blanquita Logr
REINA DE BELLEZA DE SAN PEDRO DE MACORIS -1928
La señorita Cosette Rijo ostentó la corona del reinado de belleza celebrado por el club "2 de julio" de la Sultana del Este, en 1928. Note el lector el bello traje real todo adornado de finas perlas y la diadema de brillantes exhibida sobre la frente de l
LA ALTA SOCIEDAD DE 1928 En viaje hacia Europa, fueron fotografiadas, el 17 de mayo del 1928, la señora Rosita García Mella, la niña Rosita García Mella, las señoras de Arzeno y de Trujillo, sentadas. Detras, el señor Ortiz Arzeno, cónsul de la República en San Juan, Puerto Rico,
PARA RECORDAR. BELLISIMA Su majestad María I. Reina del Carnaval del 1929. La señorita María Polanco Billini.
RUBIROSA-TRUJILLO: UNAS SUNTUOSAS BODAS EN SAN JOSE DE LAS MATAS
Jamás se habían imaginado los habitantes de San José de las Matas que el sábado 3 de diciembre de 1932 iban a ser testigos de un acontecimiento sin precedentes en el pueblo: las elegantes bodas de Porfirio Rubirosa y Flor de Oro Trujillo.
S.M. ELILA I
Esta fotografía corresponde el carnaval celebrado en la ciudad de Santo Domingo, el año 1933, en el que resultó electa la señorita Elila Mena, candidata del Club Unión.
EL REINADO.
La señorita Lina Lovatón lee su proclama al ser declarada reina del carnaval de 1936, tras el anuncio hecho por el señor Virgilio Alvarez Pina, presidente del Consejo Administrativo del Distrito de Santo Domingo. El reinado contó con el respaldo de dictad
00
REINADO DE LINA J. 1937
Para deleite de nuestros lectores la Princesa Altagracia Roxana Azar Heded, luciendo el ello traje en el baile de coronación de la Soberana Lina Ira, en el Carnaval más elegante por los costosos trajes de las participantes que se haya celebrado en EL PAIS
ARCHIVO DE ALIRO. ANIBAL JULIO TRUJILLO Y MIREYA PEYNADO 1937 El general de brigada Aníbal Julio Trujillo Molina fue el edecán de la princesa Mireya Peynado Soler en el famoso reinado de Lina Lovatón Pitaluga celebrado en 1937. Después de este reinado contrajeron matrimonio procreando a Aníbal Trujillo Peynado, alia
La señorita Lina Lovatón Pittaluga, fue coronada el 11 de enero de 1937, reina del Carnaval de Santo Domingo ARCHIVO DE ALIRO. JOSEFINA PADILLA -1940. La señorita Josefina Padilla Deschamps, capitana de la Guardia Universitaria "Presidente Trujillo", alumna del segundo curso de medicina, cuando era coronada reina de esa institución por la reina saliente señorita Patria María Trujillo Reynoso en un acto
- ARCHIVO DE ALIRO. OLGA SEIJAS-1940.
La belleza dominicana se recreó en la señorita Olga Seijas Herrero, alumna del cuarto año de la Facultad de Derecho. Tras su graduación desempeñó altos cargos tales como subconsultora jurídica de la Presidencia y miembro titular de la Junta Central Electo
SEGUNDO ANTONIO VASQUEZ- HACE 40 AÑOS.CORONAN BAEZ BREA REINA CARNAVAL DE 1952 La señorita Vilma Báez Brea fue coronada anteanoche como Reina del Carnaval de 1952, en un baile celebrado en el Club de la Juventud como parte de los actos conmemorativos de la Independencia Nacional y de las fiestas de Carnaval
ELIGEN A VILMA BAEZ BREA REINA CARNAVAL DEL 1952. La señorita Vilma Báez Brea, candidata por el Club de la Juventud, fue elegida y proclamada como Reina del Carnaval del 1952. El resultado del escrutinio lo dio el señor Armando Germán, secretario del comité organizador.
- DE MIS ARCHIVOS. DOLLY LEFELD REINA. 1952 La bellísima Dolly Leffeld Satela, de la sociedad de Santiago de los Caballeros. Resultó electa Reina de la Semana Aniversaria de la Voz Dominicana durante la inauguración de la Televisión en NUESTRO PAIS en año 1952.
BELLEZA CRIOLLA.
La señorita Triny Lluberes, proclamada Reina del Periodismo dominicano en el certamen celebrado el año 1952. Es hoy apreciada figura de la sociedad, esposa del señor Bayardo Messina
Reply edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Blocked edit
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 05:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Juliaaltagracia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No warning was given to me that editing more than three times will case auto-blocking my account
Decline reason:
You were edit warring with multiple editors over a redirect. Warnings do not need to be given for such actions, and the block was made to prevent further disruption. If you agree to cease the disruption then you may be unblocked. Stephen 21:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|I do not know all the wikipedia rules. If I knew that after three edits in the same article I was going to be blocked, I would not have done it. If I disagree with the redirect, I should just leave as it is? Ok I agree to cease the "disruption" and next time will take it to a discussion page}} --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 21:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
){kind=link}
{{adminhelp}} I´m still blocked. Can´t edit.
Your block will be released in a couple of minutes give it some time while the system updates..
Thanks
Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 23:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
No, I am not an administrator. However, according to wikipedia's deletion policy, anyone other than the page crator can remove a speedy they disagree with. I disagreed with your speedy deletion request as the reason you gave did not meet any of the speedy deletion criteria listed here. These are the only reasons a page can be speedy deleted so your tagging was in error. Feel free to get an administrator to look at my actions but I am confident they will confirm I have done nothing wrong.
Additionally I have reverted your most recent change to this article as I have found a reliable source that says homosexuality is legal in the Dominican Republic and I have added this source to the article. I think you may be confusing the 'legality of homosexuality' which in normal English usage refers to the sexual act itself, which appears to be legal, with state acceptance of an homosexual relationship (in the form of marriage or otherwise) which does not appear to occur in the Dominican Republic. Dpmuk (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Tags edit
It is not "by" that date, the date is when the tag was added (roughly and in general) - and any editor can remove unsourced material if they think its the right thing to do. There are categories by date (preferences, Misc, show hidden categories) to help clear these up - ideally by sourcing the data, but if necessary by removing it. See WP:BACKLOG for more details. Rich Farmbrough, 01:44 30 March 2009 (UTC).
Talkback edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 01:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 01:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding CSD tags edit
The CSD tags are fairly narrowly defined in usage, and the tones of neither of those articles appeared to meet the strict definition of an A11 deletion at WP:CSD. This does not mean that I necessarily think the article should (or should not) remain at Wikipedia. Instead, the articles need to be more carefully considered using WP:AFD which will allow for a more deliberative discussion as to whether or not they belong at Wikipedia. Just start an AFD discussion, and if you are right on this, the articles will be deleted in 5 days. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I had to strike your comment as it was added after I had put {{closing}} on the AfD. Your comment was not taken into account in my close. If you have any questions about this, please get in touch. Regards SilkTork *YES! 02:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Patrick Muldoon edit
Just a question. I f I had added my opinion in time, would it have make a difference, or not? Can this decision be reverted? can you check on this article, I proposed for delete Gaetan BucherThanks.--Juliaaltagracia (talk) 02:13, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, it wouldn't have made any difference. Even though I only became aware of it after I had closed, I did read it to see if it would have changed the decision.
- I've taken a look at Gaetan Bucher. There are sources, including Time.com, but there doesn't appear to be enough to justify a standalone article. I removed the puff, and then merged the main points into the Independent Financial Centre of the Americas article. He doesn't appear to be notable beyond that company, but is enough of a part of that company to be mentioned there. Regards SilkTork *YES! 19:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Deletion Guidelines edit
Hi,
I've noticed that you've taken an interest in the Articles for Deletion discussion board. As a new contributor, you might find the following guide to be helpful. WP:DELETE. Happy editing. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 02:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I read your comment about Church of Jesus Christ (Bullaite), Whitfield Parish Glossop, and Derbyshire Village Mission and yes, you're right, they may qualify for deletion. If you want to nominate them for deletion then all you need to do is follow every step of WP:AFDHOWTO (it's easy!). It may be helpful to preview a page first before saving so that you're sure your edit will turn-up as you want it. – Shannon Rose (talk) 14:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Vicini has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 03:28, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
{{adminhelp}} I'm removing the adminhelp here, because this is being dealt with over on the AN/I, in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Vicini, which is an appropriate forum for your request - so keep the discussion etc on there. Thanks! Chzz ► 04:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Juliaaltagracia, apologies for the reverts. I had believed your edits to be vandalism because of the removal of the {{orphan}} tag. However, on closer inspection, this is obviously not the case. Once again, apologies for any trouble or distress this may have caused. Regards Fastily (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Vicini edit
I was adding internal and external links, and also category to this article Vicini and the above user reverted them.
I reverted the page to one of the edits. My question is, is it really productive to revert edits so fast and to create a problem without even asking or warning the editors? Is this right? I'm I taking the risk of being block? I see that this editor has many complaints in his talk page for the same reason. I left a message here [[1]] but I really want to complaint in the right place. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 04:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Amadeo Barletta Barletta edit
Hi -- saw your thread on ANI and thought I would comment here. (I'm not an admin.) If I had seen your "See Also" link, I too would have reverted it -- although I would have used an edit summary. The reason is that an article should only have a few "See Also"s, to avoid overwhelming readers. An article as notable as Mussolini has a lot of things to link to, and using space for somebody with as little importance (relatively speaking) as Barletta is a non-starter. Editors sometimes, after a while, start to think of things like this as equivalent to spam, and deal with it impatiently. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 02:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your response. I really don´t know why a see so many articles tagged as Orphan, like it is a necessary to have links. Also some other editors believe that some pages can be plagued with notable people in them. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 02:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
¡Hello, Julia!
I agree wih Looie on this. "See also" links should be closely tied to the subject, which I'm afraid is not the case of Barletta. He seems like an important person, but is simply not very central to Mussolini's biography.
I think that an article where you could link to Barletta is that of his native city, San Nicola Arcella. You might create a "Notable natives or residents" section there. Another article is List of Italians. I'll let you know if I think of other articles.
I hope that helps. Let me know. SamEV (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
You're quite welcome. SamEV (talk) 21:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Necesita tener calma edit
Realmente que MRDU08 (talk · contribs) desespera a cualquiera; ya yo me he retirado de Wikipedia en Inglés varias veces debido a sus acciones. Tiene una fijación extraordinaria con banderas y le gusta inventarlas; por eso siempre he dudado de ellas. Pero hay que tener calma y tratar de hacer lo que se pueda; siempre regreso porque pienso que es una pena que una fuente como Wikipedia tenga tan malas informaciones sobre RD. Te repito, tener calma ya que estamos enfrentando a una persona que, por la cantidad de trabajo (y daños) que hace, debe ser esquizofrénica. Mis recuerdos, --Jmarcano (talk) 20:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for File:Mariasela-Alvarez.jpg edit
Thank you for uploading File:Mariasela-Alvarez.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for File:Mariasela-Alvarez.jpg edit
Thank you for uploading File:Mariasela-Alvarez.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:53, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Did you still want to nominate this page for deletion? MrKIA11 (talk) 12:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Missworld Mariasela+Alvarez.jpg) edit
){kind=link}
Thanks for uploading File:Missworld Mariasela+Alvarez.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Aisha Syed edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Aisha Syed Castro edit
Hi, Juliaaltagracia, thanks for your message. I'm happy to remove the tag. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Las Hermanas Montoya edit
Thanks for the interest. Emilia was my mother, and her parents were born in Mexico, and immigrated to the United States where all the children were born except for Mercedes. Yes, we have alot of old articles, records and photos, and would like to set up a more permanent website one day. Hatman1960 (talk) 03:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Barletta.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Barletta.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Jimmy O Article edit
I saw that you left a note on the Jimmy O discussion page. You may also want to contribute your vote to the discussion over whether or not to delete the page, which is located at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jimmy_O. Thanks. David Straub (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karim Mella (June 25) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karim Mella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Juliaaltagracia,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:07, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Problems with upload of File:Karim Mella.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading File:Karim Mella.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karim Mella (July 28) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karim Mella and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
File permission problem with File:Concurso-trivia.JPG edit
Thanks for uploading File:Concurso-trivia.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Karim Mella concern edit
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Karim Mella, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Karim Mella edit
Hello, Juliaaltagracia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Karim Mella".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 21:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Juliaaltagracia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Karim Mella.jpg edit
Thank you for uploading File:Karim Mella.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)