Welcome edit

Hi MRDU08, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

MBisanz Good luck, and have fun. --MBisanz talk 06:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source for Image:Flag of the Muncipality of Cotuí.PNG edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the Muncipality of Cotuí.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Flag of the Muncipality of Pimentel.PNG edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the Muncipality of Pimentel.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla Bisonó.PNG edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla Bisonó.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 19:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:All dr FLag.PNG edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:All dr FLag.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent moves edit

Hi, MRDU08. I noticed you've made some page moves lately. It seems to me that you're trying to create redirects for the articles via moving the pages to the desired redirect, and then moving it back. There's an easier way to create redirects that doesn't involve moving the pages. You simply type in the name of the redirect you wish to create, and in the editing page, you add #REDIRECT [[Insert target link here]] and then save the page. If I misread the situation, and that was not your intention, then I suppose just ignore this! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, either here, or on my talk page. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:MRD1998Selinée.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MRD1998Selinée.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 02:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to File:MRD02Ruth.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:LogoMRD.gif) edit

You've uploaded File:LogoMRD.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Matias Ramon Mella Province edit

I have noticed that you changed all maps adding the supposely existing province. So this province, as you can see in many talk pages, do not exist. So please can you revert the maps?

I think you don't get it edit

You reverted the whole Matias Ramon Mella province article! That province do not exist! Please read this: The province Matias Ramon Mella do NOT exist. Even with congressional aproval, the president returned the project. And Please, a blog is NOT a source. Oscar987 03:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Now I know edit

Finally I understand you username nick MDRU08 - Miss Dominican Republic Universe 2008! Now I Understand a lot of things! Oscar987 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


Image permission problem with Image:MRD1994Vielka.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:MRD1994Vielka.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 17:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Delegates to Miss RD Universe 05.JPG edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Delegates to Miss RD Universe 05.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC) --—/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hola, MRDU08 edit

No dudo que ya lo sabe, pero varios usuarios estamos muy opuestos a muchos de sus cambios. Si lee al final de mi página de discusión o la de User:Pepemar2 lo verá. Y por supuesto, ya ha recibido mensajes de Oscar. Le invito a que nos explique, para empezar, ¿porqué insiste en tener ese artículo sobre Navarrete, si ese lugar es la misma Villa Bisonó? Y por favor díganos cuales son sus fuentes para Colón Insular Region. Gracias. SamEV (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Gracias por la respuesta. Le pedí a Pepe que comente sobre ella.

Nos sería de mucha utilidad si también respondiera sobre los demás temas que mencioné. Y si prefiere que le hable en inglés, dígame. Gracias. SamEV (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Región Insular de Colón edit

Si ha existido alguna vez la Región Insular de Colón, ¿por qué Vicente Tolentino Rojas en su "Historia de la División Territorial Dominicana, 1494-1943" ni Werner D. Féliz en su "División Político-Territorial Dominicana 1944-2004" lo mencionan? Pero tampoco ningún geógrafo dominicano: Santiago de la Fuente, Núñez Molina, Cucurullo, Incháustegui, entre otros, mencionan dicha región. Además, por la fecha que dices que existió, ya yo estaba en la escuela y nunca la oí mencionar ni en informes de esa época como los estudios geográficos de la costa dominicana por Carlos González, hechos en 1958-59. No aparece en ningún mapa hecho desde 1951 hasta la fecha (y los he revisado). La Oficina Nacional de Planificación (ONAPLAN), que es el organismo que ha creado las divisiones administrativas superiores a provincia, no tiene dicha región en ninguna de sus publicaciones pero tampoco aparece en las publicaciones de la Oficina Nacional de Estadística (ONE). A propósito, no son comparables las regiones Cibao y Ozama; el Cibao es una región geográfica-histórica que ya Colón menciona y, administrativamente, está dividida en varias regiones administrativas; la región Ozama es una región administrativa, no geográfica ni histórica, creada por ONAPLAN en la década de 1980. Y, finalmente, Colón descubrió y nombró a todas esas islas: Beata (que nombró Madama Beata), Catalina (Sancta Catalina) y Saona (aparentemente la nombró Savona). Para terminar, si me puede indicar en qué publicación aparece la Región Insular de Colón, lo agradecería mucho. --Pepemar2 (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your moves edit

Please do not move articles without consensus generated after a discussion listed at WP:RM. The articles you moved were conforming to Wikipedia's manual of style for the relevant subjects. Thank you. Húsönd 23:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's not how things work. Those articles must stay at their previous location. Reverting what you have done will be time consuming, so please in the future use WP:RM before attempting to move an article. By the way, when leaving comments, please sign them by simply typing four tildes ~~~~ after your message. Thanks. Húsönd 23:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm already doing that. "(province)" must stay there as it is needed to disambiguate subject. Thanks. Húsönd 23:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
MRDU08, please halt any activity related to page moves and redirects. You have caused damage that took a while to fix, and now you are creating double redirects. Please consider leaving this kind of activity until you gain more experience on Wikipedia. Regards, Húsönd 23:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

OMG!!!! WHAT are you doing! I think we must suggest that you are BLOCKED ASAP... please, what a mess! David (talk) 07:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your uploads edit

You seem to be uploading a lot of photos that are sourced to various websites and claiming they have been released under the GFDL or CC-BY-SA-3.0 license, without any evidence to back up these claims (File:MRDU07.jpg beeing the most recent example). Please stop this at once. If you have in fact obtained a permission from the copyright owner of those photos to release them under a free license (not simply permission to use on Wikipedia) you need to send a copy of the permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as soon as possible so it can be independently verified. If you do not the images will be assumed to be copyright violations and deleted in short order. --Sherool (talk) 04:25, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Map of Province of Miss Dominican Republic World 2004.PNG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Map of Province of Miss Dominican Republic World 2004.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Images that will be deleted unless verification of license is obtained edit

As mentioned above you have uploaded a large number of images sourced to various 3. party websites claiming they are free licensed (and in some cases created by you). I have tagged most of them as having unverified license now I belive so they may be deleted after 7 days of no such confirmation can be obtained (see the template on each image page for details). The affected images are:

Additionaly this image: File:476382663 11e8986c38.jpg only has "google" as it's source, this is not adequate, unless a real source that identify the copyright holder is provided it will be deleted as well.

All this also beggs the question are File:MDR06Mía.jpg and File:MRD01Claudiadelossantos.jpg rely photos you yourself have taken, or where they also found somewhere on the web? --Sherool (talk) 15:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

One of them File:MRD01Claudiadelossantos.jpg also appears at http://missuniversepageantpalace.50megs.com/candidates_2001.html in a slightly different cropping, so I think it may be from the Miss Universe press pack. Andrewa (talk) 08:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please to not remove deletion templates edit

Please do not remove image deletion templates witout adressing the converns. Simply adding another PD tag and removing the unverified permission tag does not adress the issue at all. --Sherool (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


fotografías edit

Al primero, las apologías por mi español pobre, es mi cuarta lengua. Pero - Usted está cargando muchas fotografías que sean "originarias" a los varios "Web site" y a la reivindicación ellas se han lanzado debajo de la licencia "GFDL" o "CC-BY-SA-3.0". Usted no está proporcionando ninguna evidencia para sostener estas demandas. Pare, por favor, esto inmediatamente. Si usted ha obtenido el permiso del dueño de derechos reservados de esas fotos para lanzarlas debajo de una licencia libre (no simplemente permiso para utilizar en Wikipedia) usted debe enviar una copia del permiso a "permissions-en@wikimedia.org" inmediatamente para poder verificar independientemente. Si usted no lo hace las imágenes serán asumidas para ser violaciones de los derechos reservados y suprimidas. Si usted no para el cargar de estas imágenes, le bloquearán. Skier Dude (talk) 01:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Provinces of the Dominican Republic, you will be blocked from editing. SamEV (talk) 07:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

List of Dominican flags edit

Hola, MRDU08.

De nuevo, usted ya ha de haber visto los mensajes en la página de discusión del artículo (Talk:List of Dominican flags). Si nó, le recomiendo que lo haga. Allí se ha expresado sólo dudas sobre la veracidad de esas banderas. Si tiene alguna fuente, o intención de nombrar tal, déjenos saber ahora y esperaremos unos dias para que la nombre. Si no puede citar fuentes, tendremos que quitar las banderas. Buena suerte, y hasta luego. SamEV (talk) 15:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Colón Insular Region edit

 

I have nominated Colón Insular Region, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colón Insular Region. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Problems with provincial flags edit

Here are some points that must be answered about the validity of the provincial flags, taking in account the comments by 88.15.51.13 on 5 February 2009.

  1. Some flags have changed a lot from the first version to the last one. For example, Azua, Barahona, La Romana, La Vega, Monseñor Nouel, Monte Plata, Samaná, San José de Ocoa (only colors in this case), San Juan de la Maguana and Valverde.
  2. After the comment of 88.15.51.13, the Discussion page was blanketed and some flags were radically changed: Azua, La Romana, San Juan de la Maguana.
  3. In some cases, (Samaná, San Juan de la Maguana) two versions were offered the same day, 9 February 2009
  4. There are only two references: one for Azua, with a link to a website of the Azua city not the province, and another for Sánchez Ramírez. In this last case, I suspect that in this website the copy a flag found in Wikipedia; if it is so, then it is not a valid reference. And the external is for the national flag, not provincial flags.

Because of this, I do not think that these flags are valid; they seem to be created by a person, not by the institution that they try to represent. And besides, why are these flags not present in other versions of Wikipedia, in Spanish for example. --Pepemar2 (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive alternate accounts edit

Hello, I just blocked two of your alternate accounts, MRDU08 and Santiago3.0. Please don't create other usernames if you only intent to undo the edits of other users. Our policies (WP:SOCK in particular) orders the administrators to issue blocks in such cases. Usually main accounts are also blocked, but since this is the first time that you receive such a warning, I won't block your main account. Just consider this a friendly notice. Regards, - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warnings edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Azua Province, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SamEV (talk) 17:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Dominican coats of arms, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Pepe and I have told you repeatedly about this. SamEV (talk) 18:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nonsense of Provincia Antigua de Colón edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Provincia Antigua de Colón, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Provincia Antigua de Colón provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Provincia Antigua de Colón, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:30, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


Provincia Antigua de Colón edit

I was the user who requested the deletion of that page. I consulted history and geography books, also search the internet and read about that province and found no information to back up the Name that user MRDU08 was giving to La Altagracia Province. I provided links of the history of that Province for others to verify. So there was no use to have that page which was redirected to the correct name of that province, La Altagracia.--Juliaaltagracia (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Miss Dominican Republic 1927 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Miss Dominican Republic 1927 meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Dominican Republic 1927. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Smallman12q (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Miss Dominican Republic 1928 edit

I have nominated Miss Dominican Republic 1928, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Dominican Republic 1928. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Smallman12q (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Miss Dominican Republic 1929 edit

I have nominated Miss Dominican Republic 1929, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Dominican Republic 1929. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Smallman12q (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Miss Dominican Republic 1952 edit

I have nominated Miss Dominican Republic 1952, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Dominican Republic 1952. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Smallman12q (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Miss Dominican Republic 1953 edit

I have nominated Miss Dominican Republic 1953, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Dominican Republic 1953. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Smallman12q (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Miss Dominican Republic contest edit

I hope that your intentions are good when you revert the corrections I do. Please do a search in the data bank of El Caribe, which I see you use now as reference since I left the address in the Edit Summary, and you will see that the pageants in the 70´s and 80´s were not as they do it today. More than one representative from a province or city could participate. Also most of the contests were held the same year they entered the Miss Universe and Miss World. Please stop misinforming. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 05:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Fechas y nombres de representantes edit

Hola MRDU08. Me alegro que me hayas contestado. Me imagino que el propósito de ambos es crear artículos que sirvan de guia y consulta para cualquier persona que quiera saber la historia de los concursos de belleza en República Dominicana.

El primer dato que te doy es que la mayoría de los concursos se han hecho en la ciudad Capital. Unos cuantos en Santiago.

Como te escribo arriba, antes no se celebraban concursos en cada una de las provincias, me imagino que por motivos economicos y es el caso que yo misma vivi en el 1969. Habia mas de una candidata del Distrito Nacional y muchas veces ninguna representación de las provincias.

El dueño del concurso en esa epoca y por muchos años hasta que la Secretaria de Estado de Turismo le quitó la exclusividad, era la Publicitaria Ramirez de la Mota. Luego pasó al sector privado de nuevo.

Por otro lado, si haces una busqueda en varios medios, tanto en DR1 y en los archivos del Periodico El Caribe, podrás ver por los títulos de las noticias, que los concursos fueron en el mismo año que fueron a representar el pais en Miss Universo y Miss Mundo.

Tu me pides que te de los nombres de las participantes para tu organizarlo, y los nombre que yo he puesto, son los que yo he encontrado en ese archivo. No tengo acceso a ver todos los nombres. Pero es mejor poner LA VERDAD y no inventar nombres para que la página luzca bien.

Tampoco ni tu ni yo tenemos las noticias publicadas con los puestos que ganaron cada una de las participantes. Yo podría obtenerlos tanto de Tania Baéz que hizo un programa hace un tiempo sobre los concursos, como también de la encargada de Prensa de la Secretaria de Turismo, pero para ello tendría que ir a las oficinas de ellas y es demasiado trabajo.

Es mejor poner informaciones en WIKIPEDIA que tenemos verificadas, y no inventar nombres, títulos y nominaciones ficticias.

Se que te gusta ponerles las banderitas de las provincias y otras informaciones para que todas las páginas luzcan iguales, pero si no tienes las informaciones confirmadas, repito, no es correcto poner cualquier cosa. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 13:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Miss RD edit

Okay. Pero porfavor dame los nombres de las representantes de cada ano. Yo lo organiso. Esta bien. Otra cosa es que el certamen era 1 ano temprano como pro ejemplo Miss RD 1981 fue Soraya, entiendes --MRDU08 (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Miss Republica Dominicana 1981 edit

No es cierto. Mira esto que sale en OGM-Central de Datos para el año 1981.

JOSEFINA CUELLO PRIMERA FINALISTA DEL CONCURSO NACIONAL DE BELLEZA, 

QUIEN VIAJARA MAÑANA A MIAMI, LUEGO A LONDRES, A REPRESENTAR A LA REPUBLICA DOMINICANA EN EL CONCURSO INTERNACIONAL DE MISS MUNDO 1981

Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00

CONCURSO DE BELLEZA ELIGE ESTA NOCHE SEÑORITA REPUBLICA DOMINICANA

La señorita República Dominicana 1981-1982 será elegida esta noche durante la celebración del concurso Nacional de belleza organizado por el señor Ramón Darío Cruz. Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00

EL CARIBE. VIDA SOCIAL. EL PRESIDENTE ELOGIA LA ELECCION DE FINALISTA CONCURSO DE BELLEZA El Presidente Antonio Guzmán elogió ayer la selección de la señorita Josefina Cuello como candidata al reciente Concurso Nacional de Belleza, Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00

ELEGIRAN EL DÍA 19 DE MAYO MISS REPUBLICA DOMINCIANA La señorita República Dominicana 1981 será elegida el próximo día 19 en el Night Club La Fuente del Hotel Jaragua. Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00

REINA RD EXPONE VESTUARIO LUCIRA EN NY Lucía Veras, es la señorita República Dominicana que ya se encuenra en la ciudad de nueva york donde representará el país en el Concurso de Miss Universo a celebrarse este mes en aquella noche. Año : (1981) *** Precio artículo: $190.00

LA SEÑORITA LUCIA PEÑA, ELEGIDA "MISS REPUBLICA DOMINICANA", MUESTRA DOS MODELOS DE LA DISEÑADORA GENARINA PEREZ DE FRANCO Y QUE LUCIRA DURANTE LA CELEBRACION DE CONCURSO MISS UNIVERSO EL PROXIMO DIA 20 DE ESTE MES EN LA CIUDAD DE NUEVA YORK. Año : (1981) ***Precio artículo: $190.00

http://ogm.elcaribe.com.do/ogm/consulta.aspx

search: year 1981 to 1981

Miss Republica --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


MRD 1987 edit

No tengo todos los nombres. En ese concurso solo participaron 19 Candidatasy yo encontré los nombres de 13 que fueron los que puse en el artículo. Mira estas noticias con la fecha del concurso, la cantidad de candidatas y la emisora que transmitió:

CONCURSO NACIONAL DE BELLEZA. ROMPE LA TRADICION Y SE VA A SANTIAGO. Con la participación de 19 candidatas representantes de la capital y del interior del país será celebrado esta noche el Concurso Nacional de Belleza que por primera vez tendrá por escenario la ciudad de Santiago. Año : (1987) *** Precio artículo: $150.00

HOY FINALIZA EL CONCURSO NACIONAL DE BELLEZA. 19 BELDADES EN BUSCA DE LA CORONA. Con gran entusiasmo se espera para esta noche la culminación del Concurso Nacional de Belleza, donde serán seleccionadas las representaciones dominicanas para los concursos Miss Universo, Miss Mundo, Miss América Latina, Miss Café y otros. Año : (1987) *** Precio artículo: $150.00

SEÑORITA CARMEN RITA PEREZ, LA NUEVA MISS REPUBLICA DOMINICANA. Carmen Rita Pérez, joven nativa y representante de la ciudad de Santiago de los Caballeros, obtuvo el máximo galardón en el recién finalizado Concurso Nacional de Belleza. Año : (1987) *** Precio artículo: $150.00

TRAS LAS CORTINAS. Quiero felicitar a la gente de Santiago por el gran apoyo que le dieron al Concurso Nacional de Belleza celebrado el sábado en la sala de fiestas del Centro Español, a los ejecutivos de Rahintel y demás personas que tuvieron la idea de que este evento se Año : (1987) *** Precio artículo: $150.00. POR CIERTO EL NOMBRE COMPLETO DE MISS RD 1987 es CARMEN RITA PEREZ PELLERANO. ESO HAY QUE ARREGLARLO EN EL ARTICULO.Juliaaltagracia (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


    • I see that you have reverted again the information in Miss Dominican Repubic 1986 which shows as a winner Carmen Rita Pérez Pellerano. It seems that you did not understand or did not want to accept all the above explanation I gave you March 13. I will take time again to explain that those contests where held the same year. Miss Dominican Republic 1986 was held in 1986 and Miss Dominican Republic 1987 in 1987. Stop reverting the information. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

=ARTICULOS RECOMENDADOS PARA BORRAR edit

como sabes, nominé los artículos sobre Miss Republica Dominicana 1927 al 1955 para borrar. Me gustaría saber de donde salieron esos datos, ya que si tienes alguna prueba, sería interesante poder conservarlos. Favor contestarme, porque de ser así, yo misma me puedo retractar y sugerir que los mantentan. --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


MIRA LO QUE ENCONTRE.

ARCHIVO DE ALIRO. SU MAJESTAD AMERICANA 1RA. 1927

La señorita Americana Franco, resultó triunfadora del certamen para elegir la reina del carnaval de Santiago de los Caballeros. La fiesta de coronación fue celebrada en los salones del Centro de Recreo el 27 de Febrero de 1927. Año : (1999) *** Precio artículo: $125.00

ARCHIVO DE ALIRO. REINA DE BELLEZA -1927 La distinguida y bella señorita Americana Franco electa Reina del Club de la Juventud de Santiago de los Caballeros en 1927. Año : (1999) *** Precio artículo: $125.00 --Juliaaltagracia (talk) 21:10, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Cámboya edit

I have nominated Cámboya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Q T C 05:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Mapa edit

Me parece que el mapa Template:Dominican Republic Labelled Map es una buena idea. Pero lee mis objeciones en Talk:Dominican Republic#Map. Ojalá lo arregles pronto, para volverlo a poner en los artículos. SamEV (talk) 05:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for the corrections. However, some more remain.

Put the whole name "Distrito Nacional" just below the map, with an arrow pointing from the name to the area of the Distrito Nacional. Spell out the "Ramirez" in "Sanchez Rmz." just below "Sanchez", and spell out "Isla Beata" and "Isla Saona"; they don't have to fit inside the islands, the labels just need to be near them. Move "Barahona" to the left. Move "Dajabón" up a bit, move "San José de Ocoa", "Maria Trinidad Sánchez", and "Monseñor Nouel" down. Move "Valverde" up or down. Change "Baoruco" to "Bahoruco", and "El Seibo" to "El Seybo", the correct spellings, and center both labels. If possible, put "Hermanas Mirabal" sideways, so it will fit. Are you sure you can't fit in the full spelling of San Pedro de Macorís?

If you want, center "Puerto Plata" and "Monte Cristi" more, as much as possible.

Take your time, it doesn't have to be done today or even tomorrow. SamEV (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Wow, that's pretty good. Even though you actually didn't fix them all; but maybe I'll fix the rest (Barahona, Dajabón, etc).

As for the sideways letters, I don't know! I've never used that software, so I have no idea whether it's possible or not. It was just a suggestion. I think that the abbreviated name you used is fine. SamEV (talk) 21:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ríos en Dajabón edit

No sé exactamente el número de ríos pero se puede buscar en libros. Recuerdo el Dajabón (o Masacre), Chacuey, Capotillo, Neita. Y no te apures si me molesto; es que pierdo mucho tiempo haciendo correcciones y mi conexión no admite muchas gráficas. --Jmarcano (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Miss Dominican Republic 1986 and Miss Dominican Republic 1987 edit

Brackets edit

Hello. Thank you for your many recent contributions to Wikipedia. Under sources, you keep on modeling the brackets wrong. I fixed it here for a model. Thanks! Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 16:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, your mistake is a space right before the url. Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 16:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for incorporating this in your newest contributions. I went ahead and fixed the older ones.Ŵïllî§ï$2? (Talk!/Sign) 16:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Category:Miss Perú edit

For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs. You can do this by listing the parents near the bottom of the page, each enclosed in double brackets like so:

[[Category:Beauty pageants]]
[[Category:Peruvian culture]]

I've added at least one parent to the category. I invite you to check my work for accuracy and completeness.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Cambio de nombre de artículos edit

No entiendo la razón para cambiar el nombre correcto de artículos a otro incorrecto. Es el caso de Bayaguana. Es posible que la parroquia se llame San Francisco de Bayaguana pero el artículo es sobre el municipio, no la parroquia. Las leyes 4400 del 9 de marzo de 1956 y 5220 del 21 de septiembre de 1959, las leyes que rigen la división territorial dominicana, solamente dicen Bayaguana. Si sabes, pero no imaginando, de alguna ley que haya cambiado oficialmente el nombre, me gustaría conocerla. Y, por favor, no cites a Wiki Dominicana ya que ahí quien cambió el nombre de Bayaguana a San Francisco de Bayaguana fue tu mismo, tal como aparece en el historial.

Lo mismo es el caso de la provincia San Juan; San Juan de la Maguana es la ciudad capital pero la ley 5678 del 25 de noviembre de 1961, que cambió el nombre de la provincia, dice que la provincia es simplemente San Juan. También las leyes dicen que la provincia es Santiago y no Santiago de los Caballeros, que es el nombre de la ciudad cabecera. --Jmarcano (talk) 22:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://netlife.com.vn/vn/nguoinoitieng/27533/index.aspx. As a copyright violation, File:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Vo Hoang Yen.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Non-standard flag templates edit

Please stop creating templates with invented three-letter codes for province etc. names. On English Wikipedia we use the standard {{flag}} and {{flagicon}} templates, ensuring consistency. Please read WP:WikiProject Flag Template if you would like to understand how this works, and how to work with "country data" templates. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 22:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Again, I request that you please stop creating new templates with three-letter codes that you have invented. Existing templates such as {{DOM}} use standard ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 country codes because they are reasonably well-known. But the consensus at WP:WikiProject Flag Template is that we do not create new templates like this for sub-national entities (provinces, states, etc.) and we do not invent new three letter codes that are not recognizable. Your continued failure to acknowledge this consensus is disruptive. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 18:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Roza Gough.JPG edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roza Gough.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Mbinebri  talk ← 00:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dominican Republic flags edit

Hi, MRDU08. I noticed you've created a lot of flags for Dominican Republic provinces and cities, such as File:Ciudad de San Felipe de Puerto Plata.JPG. Can I ask where you got the information needed to recreate these flag designs? Powers T 01:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please respect consensus edit

This is my last appeal for you to discuss consensus with respect to flag templates and sub-national flag usage. Please read my earlier requests for you to look at WP:WikiProject Flag Template for the preferred way of creating flag templates on English Wikipedia, and please look at WP:Manual of Style (icons) with respect to the usage of sub-national flags. I will block you for WP:disruptive editing if you fail to discuss these concerns. I am watching you user talk page for a response. Thank you. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 17:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:MRD 1991 Melissa Vargas.jpg.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:MRD 1991 Melissa Vargas.jpg.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:MRD 1990 Rosario Rodríguez.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:MRD 1990 Rosario Rodríguez.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violations? edit

Hello MRDU08. You have never replied to any message left on your talkpage, but it is important that you reply to this. I am concerned about all the images you have uploaded to Wikipedia. You claim that "I created this work entirely by myself" on each of them, but I think it is very unlikely that you took all those photographs, and drew all those flag images. Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously, and you cannot simply upload a file you found on another webpage and claim the file is your own work. I have started a thread on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Likely image copyvios—hundreds of files to get the opinions of other administrators. Please explain the source of these images, or you may be blocked from further editing. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 03:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

User:Protonk me ha pedido que traducir lo anterior en español en caso de que Vd. no entiende. Es imperativo que usted responde a esto, o su cuenta será bloqueada. - Jmabel | Talk 00:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hola, MRDU08. Vd. no ha respuesto jamás a ningún mensaje dejado en su página de discusión, pero es importante que responde a esto. Me preocupa todas las imágenes que ha puesto Vd. en la Wikipedia. Vd. reclama que ha creado cada imágen por su propio, pero creo que es muy poco probable que tomó Vd. a todos los fotos y señaló a todas las imágenes de banderas. Wikipedia toma muy en serio violación de derechos de autores, y no puede cargar en el archivo de Wikipedia cualquier imágen que se encuentra en otra página web y ponerle en el archivo como si era propio trabajo. He empezado un discusión a Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Likely image copyvios—hundreds of files ara conocer las opiniones de otros administradores. Favor de explicar los fuentes de los imagines estos, o Vd. puede ser bloqueado de editar. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 03:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Hola. Un diálogo es muy importante en este situación. Favor de responder. DurovaCharge! 15:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of UEUE edit

 

A tag has been placed on UEUE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 23:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

I have blocked this account indefinitely for repeated uploading of copyrighted material. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material and this material is especially difficult to remove where it is claimed to be free content. This block is indefinite in length, not infinite. If you respond to these warnings and help us determine the ownership of these files, I or another admin will reverse this block. If you do not, this block will remain in force. I understand that you have made many positive contributions to the encyclopedia and I do not wish for you to leave permanently. Nevertheless, if you cannot give us an indication that you understand the copyright policy, we cannot allow you to edit. I'm sorry that this is the best remaining solution. If you feel that this block is unfair you may appeal it by placing the text {{Unblock|Your reason here}} on your talk page. Please read the guide to appealing blocks prior to making an unblock request. Protonk (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of San Pedro de Macorís.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of San Pedro de Macorís.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Protonk (talk) 02:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Contestant for Miss Dominican Rep. 2009.PNG edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Contestant for Miss Dominican Rep. 2009.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Protonk (talk) 02:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:MRD03Amelia.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD03Amelia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Protonk (talk) 02:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with File:Miss France 2009.jpg edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Miss France 2009.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-12/07/content_10468323_1.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Miss France 2009.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Miss France 2009.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


Image permission problem with Image:Municipalities_of_the_province_of_San_Pedro_de_Macorís.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Municipalities_of_the_province_of_San_Pedro_de_Macorís.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can you provide a reference for your changes? What's the "handpicked" award? One of the problems of the list is that several different organizations awarded the same title. -- User:Docu

File:Ana Rita Contreras Sosa.png listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ana Rita Contreras Sosa.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:MRD 1991 Melissa Vargas.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD 1991 Melissa Vargas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:MRD 1992 Liza González.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD 1992 Liza González.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:MRD 1993 Odalisse Rodríguez.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD 1993 Odalisse Rodríguez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:MRD 1990 Rosario Rodríguez.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD 1990 Rosario Rodríguez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:MRD03Amelia.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD03Amelia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:MRD01Claudiadelossantos.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MRD01Claudiadelossantos.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Tania Medina Collado.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tania Medina Collado.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Culture House in Moca.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Culture House in Moca.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Train in Moca.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Train in Moca.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Zoo in Moca.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zoo in Moca.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue of Espaillat in Moca.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Statue of Espaillat in Moca.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Sierra de jimani.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sierra de jimani.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:House of Jimani.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:House of Jimani.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Higuey Agriculture.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Higuey Agriculture.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Santo Domingo Este plazas.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santo Domingo Este plazas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Pop carnival1.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pop carnival1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Playa Dorada PP.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Playa Dorada PP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:TelefericoPP.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:TelefericoPP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:MarinaPP.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MarinaPP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:FortalezaPP.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FortalezaPP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Colon, Dominican Republic 1956.PNG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Colon, Dominican Republic 1956.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Flag of the Muncipality of Las Matas de Santa Cruz.PNG edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Flag of the Muncipality of Las Matas de Santa Cruz.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Miss Universo Italia edit

I have nominated Category:Miss Universo Italia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Miss Universe Italy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  Mbinebri  talk ← 03:36, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello MRDU08! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,563 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Yadira Geara - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Larimar Fiallo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Paola Torres - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Ana Contreras - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Map of Province and Muncipalities that had won Miss Latin Tourism Dominican Republic.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map of Province and Muncipalities that had won Miss Latin Tourism Dominican Republic.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:Flag of the Province of San José de Ocoa.JPG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Province of San José de Ocoa.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Espaillat Province edit

 Template:Espaillat Province has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Template:María Trinidad Sánchez Province edit

A tag has been placed on Template:María Trinidad Sánchez Province requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Azua.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Azua.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:15, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Barahona.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Barahona.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Dajabón.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Dajabón.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Duarte.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Duarte.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of El Seibo.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of El Seibo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Municipalities of the province of Elías Piña.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Elías Piña.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Elías Piña.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Elías Piña.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Espaillat.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Espaillat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Hato Mayor.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Hato Mayor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Hermanas Mirabal.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Hermanas Mirabal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Independencia.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Independencia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of La Altagracia.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of La Altagracia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of La Romana.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of La Romana.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of La Vega.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of La Vega.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of María Trinidad Sánchez.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of María Trinidad Sánchez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Matías Ramón Mella.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Matías Ramón Mella.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Monseñor Nouel.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Monseñor Nouel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Monte Cristi.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Monte Cristi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Monte Plata.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Monte Plata.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Pedernales.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Pedernales.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Peravia.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Peravia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Puerto Plata.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Puerto Plata.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Samaná.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Samaná.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of San Cristóbal.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of San Cristóbal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of San Juan de la Maguana.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of San Juan de la Maguana.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Santo Domingo.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Santo Domingo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Sánchez Ramírez.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Sánchez Ramírez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Valverde.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Valverde.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Baoruco.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Baoruco.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:26, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Dependency of Isla Saona.JPG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Dependency of Isla Saona.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:43, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of City of Montevideo.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of City of Montevideo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of Rocha Department.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Rocha Department.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of Canelones Department.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Canelones Department.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Municipalities of the province of Santiago Rodríguez.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Municipalities of the province of Santiago Rodríguez.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santo Domingo Norte.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santo Domingo Norte.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Province of Matías Ramón Mella.JPG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Province of Matías Ramón Mella.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Pedro Brand.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Pedro Brand.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Guaymate.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Guaymate.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bandiera di Provincia di Isole Egadi.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bandiera di Provincia di Isole Egadi.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Las Terrenas.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Las Terrenas.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bandiera di Arcipelago Toscano.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bandiera di Arcipelago Toscano.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bandiera di Isole Eolie.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bandiera di Isole Eolie.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Tenares.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Tenares.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santa Cruz de El Seibo.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santa Cruz de El Seibo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Hato Mayor del Rey.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Hato Mayor del Rey.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of San Rafael de Monte Plata.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of San Rafael de Monte Plata.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla Tapia.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla Tapia.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Consuelo.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Consuelo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Maimón.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Maimón.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Trinidad Sánchez Nagua.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Trinidad Sánchez Nagua.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of San Gregorio de Nigua.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of San Gregorio de Nigua.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla González.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla González.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Image-COA Of Matías Ramón Mella.jpg listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Image-COA Of Matías Ramón Mella.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:COAProvincia de Colon, Rep. Dominicana.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:COAProvincia de Colon, Rep. Dominicana.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla Mellá.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Vílla Mellá.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santo Domingo de Guzmán.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santo Domingo de Guzmán.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of Cerro Largo Department.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Cerro Largo Department.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:43, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of Tacuarembó Department.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of Tacuarembó Department.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santiago de los Trienta Caballeros.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flag of the Muncipality of Santiago de los Trienta Caballeros.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Santo Toribio flag.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Santo Toribio flag.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Independencia District Lima Flag.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Independencia District Lima Flag.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bandiera di Provincia di Roma.PNG edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Bandiera di Provincia di Roma.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss Universe Nederland edit

 Template:Miss Universe Nederland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Legacypac (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Spain 2004 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Spain 2004 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Spain 2004 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss Switzerland edit

 Template:Miss Switzerland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss Bolivia edit

 Template:Miss Bolivia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss TQI República Dominicana 2007 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss TQI República Dominicana 2007 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss TQI República Dominicana 2007 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss TQI República Dominicana 2008 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss TQI República Dominicana 2008 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss TQI República Dominicana 2008 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Turismo Dominicana 2008 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Turismo Dominicana 2008 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Turismo Dominicana 2008 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Turismo Dominicana 2009 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Turismo Dominicana 2009 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Turismo Dominicana 2009 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miss Atlántico Internacional edit

 

The article Miss Atlántico Internacional has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failed to meet WP:GNG. The article has not received SIGNIFICANT coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richie Campbell (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Duarte Province edit

 Template:Duarte Province has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dajabón Province edit

 Template:Dajabón Province has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepBaoruco.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepBaoruco.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepBaoruco.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepDajabón.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepDajabón.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepDajabón.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepDuarte.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepDuarte.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepDuarte.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepElSeibo.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepElSeibo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepElSeibo.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepHatoMayor.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepHatoMayor.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepHatoMayor.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepIndependencia.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepIndependencia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepIndependencia.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepLaRomana.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepLaRomana.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepLaRomana.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepMaríaTrinidadSánchez.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepMaríaTrinidadSánchez.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepMaríaTrinidadSánchez.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepMonteCristi.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepMonteCristi.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepMonteCristi.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepPedernales.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepPedernales.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepPedernales.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepPuertoPlata.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepPuertoPlata.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepPuertoPlata.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSanJosédeOcoa.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepSanJosédeOcoa.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSanJosédeOcoa.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSanPedrodeMacorís.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepSanPedrodeMacorís.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSanPedrodeMacorís.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSantiagoRodríguez.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepSantiagoRodríguez.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSantiagoRodríguez.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepValverde.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepValverde.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepValverde.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepAzua.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepAzua.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepAzua.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepBarahona.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepBarahona.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepBarahona.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepDistritoNacional.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepDistritoNacional.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepDistritoNacional.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepElías Piña.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepElías Piña.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepElías Piña.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:59, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepEspaillat.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepEspaillat.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepEspaillat.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepHermanasMirabal.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepHermanasMirabal.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepHermanasMirabal.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepLaAltagracia.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepLaAltagracia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepLaAltagracia.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepLaVega.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepLaVega.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepLaVega.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepMonseñorNouel.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepMonseñorNouel.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepMonseñorNouel.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepMontePlata.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepMontePlata.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepMontePlata.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepPeravia.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepPeravia.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepPeravia.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSamaná.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepSamaná.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSamaná.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSánchezRamírez.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepSánchezRamírez.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSánchezRamírez.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSanCristóbal.JPG edit

 

The file File:DomRepSanCristóbal.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSanCristóbal.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSanJuan.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepSanJuan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSanJuan.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DomRepSantiago.jpg edit

 

The file File:DomRepSantiago.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

superseded by File:DomRepSantiago.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Baoruco Province edit

 Template:Baoruco Province has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 16:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Miss Costa Rica edit

 Template:Miss Costa Rica has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:54, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paola Torres for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paola Torres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Allison Baeyens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:OW edit

 Template:OW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dennis Brown - 23:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Miss Peru 2003 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Peru 2003 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Nicaragua 2001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Map of Province of Miss Dominican Republic World 2006.PNG listed for discussion edit

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map of Province of Miss Dominican Republic World 2006.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:DominicanRepublicSubdivisions2008.JPG edit

 

The file File:DominicanRepublicSubdivisions2008.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:DominicanRepublicSubdivisions2008.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Dominican Provinces.PNG edit

 

The file File:Dominican Provinces.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by c:File:Dominican Labelled Map.PNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miss Bolivia 2008 edit

 

The article Miss Bolivia 2008 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced to two blogs, presumably non-notable under WP:GNG policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Miss Brazil 2001 edit

 

The article Miss Brazil 2001 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violates WP:BLP policy as an unreferenced article about a number of living persons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Reply