Wikipedia

User talk:John F. Lewis/Archive 2

< User talk:John F. Lewis
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Curtaintoad in topic Talkback
John F. Lewis
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Sergey Brin

Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Sorry I haven't done much with the GA for this - real life and other stuff has somewhat intervened. I hope to make some progress tonight and tomorrow on this. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Alrght, thanks. John F. Lewis (talk) 17:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
I've now done a first sweep of the whole article and put the review on hold. See Talk:Sergey Brin/GA1 for more comments. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:47, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
I am working on fixing them now and tomorrow/Friday. Should all be tied up soon. John F. Lewis (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sergey Brin

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've checked everything from the GA review and made one minor modification about the attribution to Gmail account hacking. Everything else is in order, so I have passed the article. Well done. --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:11, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Great, Thanks. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

GAN: Dive Coaster

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello again! I don't know if you remember me but you reviewed the Floorless Coaster and Bolliger & Mabillard articles for GA status. I was wondering if you would be interested in reviewing Dive Coaster as it is quite similar to the Floorless Coaster article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Sure. Ill get a start on it soon. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dive Coaster GAN

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I believe I have fixed everything!--Dom497 (talk) 20:23, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive
 

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

EdwardsBot (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bhopal disaster

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bhopal disaster, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Gulbenk (talk) 03:50, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

There was just a misunderstanding which I have clarified. TheSpecialUser TSU 09:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Reviewer

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled reviewer rights on your account. This gives you the ability to:

  • Accept changes on pages undergoing pending changes,
  • Have your changes automatically accepted on pending changes level 2 protected pages, and
  • Administrate article feedback.

Please remember that this user right:

  • Can be removed at any time for misuse, and
  • Does not grant you any special status above other editors.
You should probably also read WP:PROTECT, since this user privilege deals largely with page protection. As the requirements for this privilege are still in a state of flux, I would encourage you to keep up to date on the WP:REVIEWER page. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions! Happy editing! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding Laravel

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I see the article was userfied to your space and then you requested it be deleted. I have deleted the article in main space, but I can userfy it to your space again if you wish.

Regarding your comment on the talk page when you contested deletion: we generally don't use blogs as external links, and almost never as references. See WP:ELNO. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. If you could userfy it, it would be nice. Thanks. John F. Lewis (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dragon (spacecraft) GA nomination

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey, have you started reviewing Dragon (spacecraft) for GA yet? — Michaelmas1957 (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

No, I forgot about it. I'll start it tonight. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I hope it passes the review. — Michaelmas1957 (talk) 03:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A pie for you!

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  1000+ and it is awesome! Seriously, you are far better than what I was at 1K. I'm a good cook so a pie for you. Thanks for creating Wikipedia:WikiProject Intel too TheSpecialUser TSU 06:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks John F. Lewis (talk) 07:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Articles for creation needs YOUR help!

 

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2714 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Hello, John F. Lewis. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 00:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Zambrana or Zambrano Family linage wiki

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have evaluated my work before this is an updated vertion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Itzcoatzin/sandbox

If you know anyone that has a better softawre to make better arms let me know. I am currently looking for the zambrano palace in Zamora. The goverment made it into a goverment building.

And the zambrano family from Italy. Refer to as The Royal Family Zambrano.


Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk)

Jose Luis Zambrano De Santiago (talk) 02:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your Arbitration Committee Election Vote

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Hello John F. Lewis,

You recently voted in the Arbitration Committee Elections. In accordance to the Request for comment on the election process, you must have made 150 edits in the main article space of Wikipedia before November 1st in order to be eligible to vote. According to a recent count, you may not have met that criterion (some edits were since deleted). If you believe we are in error, or there are other circumstances, such as a number of edits across multiple accounts, please let us know. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Apologies Reaper Eternal, at the time in question I mis calculated the actual number of main space edits. However I have enough to vote next time it comes around. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from 'Ferwert'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferwert (talk • contribs) 04:06, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Hello John I made an attempt at acquiring the necessary expertise to write and/or revise in Wikipedia, but give up John. My primary interest was to rectify a blatant piece of propaganda from one side of the Thailand Political Divide, under the heading "2010 Thai Political Protests". And I want to thank you for offering to be my mentor. I really appreciated that. But the work needed to "get myself up to speed" just isn't worth it, considering my interest in balancing out articles that are singularly focussed on Political reporting from Thailand. You can read my exchange with the guy that wrote the above noted article, who I know is an operative from that side of the political divide. He is on many other English language discussion forumns full time. For your information however, I played around with some of the lessons you sent me. Below is a partial record of that. Thx. again for your help John, and I will let the biased reportage on the "2010 Thai Political Protests" remain on Wikipedia. Bye for now Ferwert

Thanks for informing me Ferwert, I'll deal with your page now. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

A:1909 in Canadian football From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grey Cup Championship December 4 1st Annual Grey Cup Game: Rosedale Field – Toronto, Ontario

Toronto Varsity Blues 26 Toronto Parkdale Canoe Club 6

Toronto Varsity Blues are the 1909 Grey Cup Champions


< 99th Grey Cup 101st Grey Cup >


B: The 100th Grey Cup was a Canadian football game between the East Division champion Toronto Argonauts and the West Division champion Calgary Stampeders to decide the champion of the Canadian Football League in the 2012 season. The game took place on Sunday, November 25, 2012, at Rogers Centre in Toronto, Ontario.[2] This was the fourth Grey Cup game played at Rogers Centre, and the 46th in the city of Toronto. The Argonauts defeated the Stampeders 35–22 to win their sixteenth Grey Cup title.[3][4] This was the third meeting between Calgary and Toronto for the Grey Cup championship and the first since the 79th Grey Cup in 1991. This was also the second consecutive year that the Grey Cup game was won by the team from the host city. The result of the game also meant that Argonauts owner David Braley became the first team owner to win back-to-back Grey Cups with two different teams; Braley also owns the 2011 champions, the BC Lions.[5] Over 5.8 million viewers watched the game, with roughly 5.5 million originating from English Canada, making the game the most-watched Grey Cup ever recorded on English-language television.[6] Following the game, Toronto running back Chad Kackert was named the Most Valuable Player.[7] His teammate, defensive end Ricky Foley received the Dick Suderman Trophy as the Most Valuable Canadian.[8]


Clean-up notes – A discrepancy was noted in Wikipedia. • In entry “A” above, it was noted that the first Grey Cup was awarded in 1909 • In entry “B” above, the 2012 Grey Cup game was featured as being the 100th. Grey Cup Game. • Suggested alteration as follows, shown in red. The 100th Grey Cup was a Canadian football game between the East Division champion Toronto Argonauts and the West Division champion Calgary Stampeders to decide the champion of the Canadian Football League in the 2012 season. The 100th Grey Cup of the modern era Canadian Football League between the East Division champion Toronto Argonauts and the West Division champion Calgary Stampeders to decide the championship of Canadian Football for the 2012 season, was held on November 25, 2012. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2010 AHL All-Star Game 2010 American Hockey League All-Star Game From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search 

	This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page.
	This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article with a good introductory style. (February 2010) 

	This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; suggestions may be available. (February 2010)



The 2010 participants The 2010 American Hockey League All-Star Game was held on January 18–January 19, 2010 at Cumberland County Civic Center, in Portland, Maine. Where Canadian AHL All-Stars completed a sweep of the 2010 Time Warner Cable AHL All-Star Classic with a come-from-behind 10-9 shootout win over PlanetUSA.[1] The AHL All-Star game is made up of the top AHL prospects The 2010 American Hockey League (AHL) All-Star weekend was held on January 18-19th, at Cumberland County Civic center in Portland, Maine. The Canadian All-Stars swept the three game series with a come-from-behind 10-9 shootout win over the American All-Stars. The tournament was sponsored by Time Warner Cable.


2010 AFC Cup knockout stage ? This title is most non-descriptive. What is the “AFC”? I was attracted to the article thinking it was about the American Football Conference of the National Football League. The introductory, or ‘Lead Section” does nothing to clarify this, nor provide a summary of its’ major aspects. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search 

	The lead section of this article may need to be rewritten. The reason given is: Lead contains only a Main article link. Please discuss this issue on the talk page and read the layout guide to make sure the section will be inclusive of all essential details. (May 2010)

Main article: 2010 AFC Cup Contents [hide] • 1 Bracket • 2 Round of 16 • 3 Quarter-finals o 3.1 First leg o 3.2 Second leg • 4 Semi-finals o 4.1 First leg o 4.2 Second leg • 5 Final • 6 References

[edit] Bracket Note: while the bracket below shows the entire knockout stage, the draw for the round of 16 matches was determined at the time of the group draw. The draw for the quarter-finals and beyond was held separately, after the conclusion of the round of 16. Because of the country protection rule, if there are two clubs from the same country, they will not face each other in the quarter-finals. Therefore, the two clubs from Syria, Kuwait, and Thailand may not be drawn with each other in the quarter-finals.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferwert (talk • contribs) 04:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

CSD:G12 on Marty Ashby

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've declined the CSD:G12 (Copyright) nomination on the above mentioned article. You did nothing wrong, however it was revealed that the author of the article was contracted by the subject (and provided copy) to write the article. I've tagged it with the COI tag and given the author guidance about how to resolve the Copyright concerns. Thank you for your effort, but I didn't nominate it for G12 because there was enough different to make the nomination not blatantly obvious. Hasteur (talk) 22:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks for proving your rationale for declining. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Hand-coding

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyes wikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:31, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

Delivered 00:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Hello, John F. Lewis. You have new messages at Curtaintoad's talk page.
Message added 07:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 07:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Non-admin closure

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I undid your relisting of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Baltimore Orioles Opening Day starting lineups. This does not seem to fall under WP:NACD. With the number of participants in the AfD, it seems like an admin could make a close call or even rule "no consensus". The essay WP:NAC only recommends relisting "AfDs with little or no discussion may be relisted if they're relatively new". WP:RELISTINGISEVIL provides a rationale. Let me know if you have any concerns. Cheers.—Bagumba (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Apologies for this. Must have been a slip up from me. John F. Lewis (talk) 22:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
No prob.—Bagumba (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have no vandalise

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Post the vandalism on page Jonkerz (talk) --FROESES (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

To me your edits appear to be vandalism. What does not support your case is your fourth revert. Regardless of vandalism or not, reverting more than three times is inappropriate. If you have a problem, Please take it up with the editor and if you are doing non vandalism edits, The user would see they are in the wrong and revert their revert. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Relisting AfD's

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I noticed you relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 157 after a substantial amount of discussion. Thanks for helping out, but this was not a proper relist. Please read WP:RELIST when you have a moment. Relisting is for AfD's that lack sufficient participation. When you relisted that AfD, it had pages of discussion and over two dozen contributors. When AfD's like that are relisted, it can cause problems, up to and including the invalidation of the AfD in some cases. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Thanks. ‑Scottywong| comment _ 16:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Apologies. This was done around the time of the previous case (See a few above) and it was a slip up. I should have reviewed all actions I did around the above case. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thank you for your help. By the way, you are free to "hey" me all you want ;) jonkerz ♠talk 23:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

I was correcting the lower case 'h' and I thought while I am there, I might as well make it formal as then and there I was doing a technical NAC to you AN/I report. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:01, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Inquiry

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Did you manually tally Darkwind's AfD !votes to result or is there a handy tool for this? Mkdwtalk 03:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

There is a template I used, if I am correct in your request it is the template 'RfA tally'. John F. Lewis (talk) 03:11, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Wait if you are on about the template in the table, check out the Crat Noticebord John F. Lewis (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
I meant WP:AFD tally not RfA tally. "In AfD, 91% of his votes matched the closing consensus." Mkdwtalk 03:50, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
toolserver John F. Lewis (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

RfC

Latest comment: 11 years ago9 comments3 people in discussion

It was appropriate because we are discussing it and its going nowhere. RfC is there for third party review.Lucia Black (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Actually a RfC should be filed correctly and not on a now failed GA nomination. I would like to go into more detail but my reverts and closure speaks for itself in this situation. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I added that to the main talk page. But some GAN template made it so it would go there. On another note if you would like to serve as third-party then it would be best you talked to both of us at the same time because right now it feels like theres more of an alliance.Lucia Black (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
I am not one sided. Chris came to the IRC asking for help on the matter, I am talking him through all appropriate Wikipedia policies. No alliance is present. John F. Lewis (talk) 23:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Im asking for help too. He's spear heading eerything. Yes good intentions but abusing the process of consensus and i've reverted enough, any more and an edit war and surely ill get blocked. No one is helping me in this situation, and i'm stressing out.Lucia Black (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

You are in an alliance if there is absolutely no middleground where we can discuss, sigh...you really not helping, you just allowing him to edit and change the article's focus without really bringing in any third party. This is getting ridiculous.Lucia Black (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

There is middle ground. There is dispute resolution, ANI and several others noticeboard a where tis can be dealt with. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I already gave the warning. But you helping himm didnt really worked out. Next time, if you "help" make sure its not based on talking to him and not with the one he has an issue.Lucia Black (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

First off I don't even know Lewis, we are not in alliance or whatever you are insinuating. That's not AGF and you have continued to toss terms like bias around at the mere mention that I was a fan of Shirow's work. You over react and create drama about it. I asked for assistance because I was having difficulty in dealing with this situation and wanted clarity on convention. I do not know all of Wikipedia's policies in every minute detail, but I wanted to be sure that it was proper to try and fix what you broke, and according to policy is seems I am allowed to do that. I haven't even really started to fix the broken stuff because you keep raising objections and nonsensical solutions that are detrimental. Changing the scope of a very popular franchise page to deal solely with the manga on your personal opinion is wrong, the franchise is notable and forcing the main incoming link to be solely about the manga is a bad idea, what if they came from another Wikipedia page, outside of Wikipedia? Its the #2 result on Google, why should it be confined to the manga? It does not make sense. Your argument should make sense and be persuasive. Your argument is based on opinion and 'because I think so' not on practicality. That's the issue I have with it. That's why I want to fix it. And I have 250 sources now to do so. If you want to nom the manga for GA, nom the manga, don't make the main incoming link about the manga. That's all. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 7 January 2013 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
 
Hello, John F. Lewis. You have new messages at Curtaintoad's talk page.
Message added 09:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

It is extremely urgent!!! CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Hello, John F. Lewis. You have new messages at User:John F. Lewis/Adopt/Curtaintoad.
Message added 09:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I think I am done! I did the best I can!! CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

re curtaintoad

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I'm curtaintoad's mum.

I have just looked through his recent messages and tried to explain a few things to him.

He is a child with autism, so a lot of this info is hard for him to understand at first, but he will get it eventually..with this in mind, I have suggested to him that he leaves it for a while before he attempts the adoptee test.

I'd like to thank you for your help so far.

WendyS1971 Talk 10:27, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Fully understood. If he wishes to avoid my general adoption reminders I suggest it is best to stop going into hat collecting or being to eager to do things such as requesting permissions or announcing his wishes to be an administrator. I keep a regular track of his contributions so I know all of his actions since October and hat collecting it among them. If I don't see any of those then I would be willing to hold off adoption with his until possibly late April early may before I remind him. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:17, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Just a note that you pointed to your user page instead of User:talk.   Rich Farmbrough, 20:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC).

Confused right now. Mind explaining or pointing this out?John F. Lewis (talk) 21:01, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Oh never mind. Just looked at my contributions and saw your correction. Thanks for that. John F. Lewis (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your Bot

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hey! I was just looking at your bot BRFA and saw that you are in trial, I have had a look at User:JohnFLBot/Docs but I can't quite work out how to set up the bot to work in the way my archives already do (see my talk page). I would appreciate any help, maybe the docs page needs a bit more description for some of the variables. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 14:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I will expand the docs once I get time to do some debugging on the bot, which should be Saturday. I'll take a look at how your archives are configured and post the correct lines that need to configured at some point. Thank you for your interest too Addshore. John F. Lewis (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

IRC

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, are you avaliable anytime on IRC (freenode network)? If so, if you could either tell me your username, or PM me (mine's gwickwire), I'd like to talk to you about something in real time. Thanks. gwickwiretalkedits 23:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Ill message you but for the record it is 'JohnLewis' John F. Lewis (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments3 people in discussion
 
Hello, John F. Lewis. You have new messages at Curtaintoad's talk page.
Message added 00:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The section was removed. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Reverted the removal. John F. Lewis (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Reverted the removal of the removal! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!--Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the section Demiurge1000. CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 00:58, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:John_F._Lewis/Archive_2&oldid=1082554845"