Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
  • currently retired


Click here to leave me a new message, Click here to e-mail me


Cometstyles Discussion Page..Do whatever you want !!
Cometstyles Discussion Page


Welcome edit

Hello Cometstyles! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- THLCCD 12:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Archives edit

  • <<<My Wasted Time>>>
November 2006 December 2006
January 2007 February 2007
March 2007 April 2007
May 2007 June 2007
July 2007 August 2007
September 2007 October 2007
November 2007 December 2007
January 2008 February 2008
March 2008 April 2008
May 2008 June 2008
July 2008 August 2008
September 2008 October 2008
November 2008 December 2008
2009

RfD nomination of Accountcreator edit

I have nominated Accountcreator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. flaminglawyer 01:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:Shock jocks edit

I have nominated Category:Shock jocks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Mattinbgn\talk 11:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Sue Gardner edit

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Sue Gardner. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Gardner. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

Hello Cometstyles! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Mac McCallion - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jainendra Kumar (Fiji) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Tevita Vuibau - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Netani Sukanaivalu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Nazhat Shameem - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Greg Smith (rugby union, born 1974) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Isoa Neivua - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey edit

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Cometstyles! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Proposed deletion of Sue Gardner edit

The article Sue Gardner has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. @-Kosh► Talk to the VorlonsMoon Base Alpha-@ 20:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Canterbury crusaders.jpg edit

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Canterbury crusaders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:22, 9 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Blues logo.gif edit

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Blues logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

8 years on Wikipedia, woo hoo! edit

--L235-Talk Ping when replying 22:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Smile edit

--L235 (talk) Ping when replying 02:17, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Rae Costello edit

The article Daniel Rae Costello has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:SPG2007.jpg edit

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:SPG2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Daniel Rae Costello for deletion edit

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Rae Costello is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Rae Costello until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mutt Lunker (talk) 04:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

New deal for page patrollers edit

Hi Cometstyles,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Happy Holidays! edit

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago edit

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

"The Avengers (2011)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

The redirect The Avengers (2011) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 30 § The Avengers (2011) until a consensus is reached. Gonnym (talk) 12:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Freeze(film)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

The redirect Freeze(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § Freeze(film) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply