User talk:Chaser/Archive 29

Archives
2006: Mar—Jun 19 | Jun 20—Jul | Aug—Sep | Oct—Dec 17 | Dec 17—31 2007: Jan | Feb—May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 2008: Jan—May | Jun—Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 2009: Jan—Apr | May—Aug | Sep | Oct—Nov | Dec 2010: Jan—Jun | Jul—Oct | Nov—Dec 2011: Jan—Mar | Apr—Jul 2012: Jul—Aug | Sep—Dec 2013: Jan—Dec 2014: Jan—Dec 2015: Jan—Dec

ITN, ENGVAR

FYI, the previous wording avoided the "defeat"/"defeats" issue. —David Levy 16:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, it's an American story. If we get lots of flak from people that don't understand ENGVAR, or if you just feel strongly about it, then change it back.--Chaser (talk) 16:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't feel strongly about it; brevity is desirable too, and we had a "defeat" item last week (so it isn't as though we're imposing a double standard). I'm just explaining the rationale behind the unusually detailed wording that I used.  :) —David Levy 17:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Question

Wouldn't the ncaa final have ended at 4 utc on the 5th? The plane accident happened on the 4th? RxS (talk) 01:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, you're right. I found the time of the crash in the article, but I was going by the date on T:ITN. That date was wrong, as were almost all the others [1]. They are all fixed now.--Chaser (talk) 02:34, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Jasmine

My concern was edits like this, which the editor insisted on re-adding, and template me for being disruptive when I reverted. Corvus cornix_talk 20:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Signature

Ok, thank you. :) Do you have the talkback function? Purplepox01 20:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Purplepox01 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Purplepox01 20:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, would appreciate any help/advice dealing with simple issue concerning legal i.d.

Hello, Chaser. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Verapar (talk) 18:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join Wikimedia US/WALRUS mailing list

Hi Chaser! I'd like to invite you to join wikimediaus-l, where we already discussing The Great American Wiknic for June 2011 :)--Pharos (talk) 21:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bput logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bput logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

ITN

Sure, the way I read the discussion was that the current blurb should be updated but not moved. But I might be wrong and have no problem... RxS (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Never mind, someone got to it. RxS (talk) 18:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

ITN: 2011 Syrian uprising

-- tariqabjotu 19:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Joplin tornado ITN

This was already posted at the bottom, I hope you don't mind that I removed your double-post. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 12:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit Warrior

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh please. There's no consensus to include this joke candidate. One reversion does not an edit war make.--Chaser (talk) 22:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Please discuss matters on the talk page and remember the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Also please do not commit BLP violations by labeling individuals as jokes.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:28, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

RFC

Why did you start an RFC without proposing a standard? We can't just vote to remove candidates we don't like.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Furthermore, it is highly disingenuous to say you are on a wikibreak if you are not.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Actually it is merely forgetful rather than highly disingenuous, but thanks for playing the AGF game!--Chaser (talk) 02:20, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

No, thank you for addressing the most important issue on this post and then disregarding the other!--William S. Saturn (talk) 05:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

This whole thing really needs to stop. This is becoming a vicious edit war. Even though I agree with you, Chaser, that Saturn's perhaps stubborn way of sticking to what he considers consensus even though he has confifed that he agreees Sharkey's inclusion is ridiculous, we need to conduct this in a more agreeable manner. SOXROX (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

OK, I think from his nonresponse that he's inclined to disengage, and I'll do the same.--Chaser (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

No. Actually, I want an answer to the question.--William S. Saturn (talk) 16:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to the standards from 2008, provided they are not applied to joke candidates that are not actually campaigning. Determining whether Sharkey is a joke candidate may be somewhat difficult, but I think the RFC will allow the community to determine that based on reference to what reliable sources say about him. You say that's original research, etc. I disagree, for reasons I've already stated on the talk page.--Chaser (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

I don't understand why you feel certain notable individuals should be included while other notable individuals should not. Should references to Pat Paulsen be removed from the 1968 election page? If Stephen Colbert had filed with the FEC should he have been removed from the 2008 page? Perhaps the difference between those two and Sharkey is notability, but if Sharkey is a non-notable individual, why does he have a wikipedia page? It's very hypocritical to say a presidential candidate is notable but then exclude them from the election page because they are a "joke".--William S. Saturn (talk) 17:22, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

I think I've answered your question. I'm going to my picnic. If my guess from the articles you edit is correct, then you're American too. Happy Memorial Day.--Chaser (talk) 17:25, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

United States presidential election, 2012

Please note that a "straw poll" has been added at Talk:United States presidential election, 2012#Straw poll for an issue you discussed.--William S. Saturn (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Humor disallowed

Just wanted to see if people can laugh in Wikipedia. Since no one responded and you decided to remove the section with the humorous link, it just seems like we have a group of people with no humor left. Is this true? -- Avanu (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm actually asking a serious question. The link you removed was not harmful and was clearly marked (levity), so why the dour attitude? -- Avanu (talk) 01:46, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Avanu, two editors responded. Both cited WP:FORUM, as did a third editor,[2] whose talk page this is, when removing the section. Gacurr (talk) 02:39, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

(@Gacurr) Do you lack the ability to cite a specific problem with it? The question I'm asking is why the all-work no-play attitude? It is a silly picture, simply intended to facilitate discussion by lightening the mood, unfortunately some of you can't seem to move past grump-mode. -- Avanu (talk) 02:42, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Avanu. See the comment Orange Mike left at your talk page.[3] Gacurr (talk) 02:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Did you even actually look at the picture or just decry it outright? -- Avanu (talk) 02:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Answer to question

Yes, I am the same person on Commons! Icosahedron (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File:NDENIS FOTO -1.jpg

I've responded on my talk page and also added a bit from that post to the PUF file. I appreciate your position here, but what you've inadvertently landed in is a messy sockpuppet-infested article that has burned through quite a few editors over the past couple of years. ScottyBerg (talk) 13:25, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

POTY

Wow I did not see my nominated picture got picture of the year. Spongie555 (talk) 23:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Per a third-party request at WP:RFP/A, I have granted you autopatrolled user rights. --Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 14:16, 19 July 2011 (UTC)