The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article help edit

Edmond Wilhelm Brillant Thx - Fttxguru (talk) 17:27, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Right, here I go.
  • If you don't know how to add sources (which you really need to do in the article, just clumping some up at the bottom doesn't always make the cut), read this article - WP:CITE#HOW
  • The writing style itself isn't very fluid. You keep repeating information which has already been said before. For some pointers on how to patch all of this up, read this article - Wikipedia:Your first article
  • Do not use abbreviated terminology without giving the full name of the organization/person/whatever beforehand. Instead of simply saying "he joined the IDF", you should say "he joined the Israel Defence Forces (IDF)." The latter format means that you can just use 'IDF' whenever you want to refer to the Israel Defence Forces again, without having to spell the whole thing out. However, bear in mind that some parties such as the Royal Navy cannot be shortened to a few letters such as 'RN'. You should always write out these groups in full.
  • When providing wiki-links, check before whether the page exists and/or how you can make the link more direct. Instead of putting something like the "U.S." for example, say instead "United States" so the link doesn't have to have a small re-directed caption. (makes your article and Wikipedia look more professional)
Thats all for now. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to drop me a note. Regards, ayrton_prost 19:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

RE: Thanks a lot edit

Once again, you are certainly welcome and thanks for the barnstar! :)

The Helpful One 17:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Enjoy ^_^ ayrton_prost 19:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

Thanks very much, I really appreciate it. I was a bit worried because it must have looked like I was just charging around reverting your edits, and I didn't want to annoy you! I'm a bit of a grammar freak as well as an F1 nut, so I can get a bit irritating at times. Keep up the good work :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Haha, well I was initially surprised how you did manage to track down all my initial inputs. Don't worry though, I'm glad you patched most of them up. I was in a real hurry to get it out of the way before doing some work, and your tweaks here and there were very welcome. ayrton_prost 16:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hehe well if an article has anything to do with F1, it'll be on my watchlist, so it pops up every time someone makes an edit. After races there's always a real scramble to update everything, and people often miss things or there are typos etc, so there's always lots to do! Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, anticipation of the massive scramble is mainly why I tried to get some info in [first] as well. XD ayrton_prost 17:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edmond Wilhelm Brillant edit

Hi Thx a lot for your help.

I appreciate the time you took and take for editting this value.

The citations and records are from Hebrew Wiki I enclosed where you may see genuine documents and photos, even tough you cannot read Hebrew you can see the docs and photos, some are in English from RN, some are in French from SS Shalom mission Brillant was. Others are from Navy commander in chief, Hagana etc. My goal is to convert them all to English version.

All metarial is also in the Hagana Archive Brillnat File Tel Aviv and IDF Archive Brillnat File

Best

Fttxguru (talk) 06:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's cool. I understand you listed all the sources at the end there, and good job too. However, as I said on the talk page of the article, that always isn't enough for more uptight editors. They want to be assured the info you have in there is referenced on the spot. So, all you have to do is take the same links you left on the page, and simply connect them up to bits in the article where they correspond using the citation guide I provided. I understand that'll take a lot of work, but the whole article will look far more proffessional and reliable as a result. For the time being then, just leave a note on the talk page that you're trying to sort all this out. As for me, I'll put a message at the top of the article explaining what is going on (using a 'cover-up' code, the message can only be seen when in the edit page format).
If your still unclear on anything I just said (I wouldn't be surprised if you were, I'm doing this all in a hurry), then please say so. Regards, ayrton_prost 10:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi

Thx again

I wonder if you can create the citation indexing I left numbers in parenthesis to match each citation

Thx

Fttxguru (talk) 05:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm quite busy dealing with various WP:F1 tasks, so I'll quickly show you how it's done.
Basically, when you want to reference something, use the following format ->
<ref>Author, name of book, page number(s) if necessary</ref>
If you are citing from a web page, do this ->
</ref>{{cite web|url=address of the web page goes here|title=name of the article goes here|publisher=whoever published the material is named here|date=when the web page was first published goes here|accessdate=the date when you added the contents to the wiki article goes here}}</ref>
At the end of the page after all of this, add a
{{reflist}}
or
<references/>
tag beneath the
==References==
section so the citations will be visible for all to see in the proper format. Before doing this though, remove all the links you've already put there.
When you have to cite information which comes later on in the article to a reference which has already been used beforehand, instead of repeating the above format, do the following ->
<ref name=insert title of the respective citation which has been used beforehand here/>
Sorry for coming across are lazy, but I'm afraid my to-do list is crammed up as it is at the moment. I hope I've explained the processes clearly enough to you. Hey, at the end of the day, I guess if you do all this yourself the experience will come in handy for future situations. ayrton_prost 10:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Again thx a lot

Fttxguru (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem buddy. I bid you the best of luck. ayrton_prost 14:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

Thx for the tip! CheesyBiscuit (talk) 13:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. It's very useful for other editors to more easily (and more quickly) assess whether your changes are beneficial or not. ayrton_prost 13:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (March) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 12:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warning vandals edit

No problem, I normally do, don't know if that was a problem with huggle (it does sometimes not warn users) or if I just reverted by accident and forgot to warn. Anyways, thanks for letting me know. Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ah, OK. Keep up your good work all the same though. ayrton_prost 14:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Will do :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Signed twice! edit

You're number three on my guestbook under your old username, of course it was you who showed me how to set one up! Anyway you're now signatories 3 and 53. Looking back, you signed as Blooded Edge on 13th October 2008, six months ago. The times flown by! Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 15:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

/facepalm, lol, sorry about that. I actually asked myself whether I had signed beforehand as BE, but when I did a [super-quick] scroll down, I didn't spot out my old signature. Ach, removed entry number 53 anyway though. But hey, while you're here, how you doing? Ayrton Prostsign 15:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
NO! Don't remove it. Why not have it twice? I'm going to put it back! I'm fine thanks, not really doing much except Huggling. See ya! Oliver Fury, Esq. message • contributions 16:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Lol, you're page after all. Ayrton Prostsign 16:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Fine edit

I should be doing it myself I just haven't been able to get round to it. Chubbennaitor 17:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

But you don't mind if I add a few personally? Ayrton Prostsign 19:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't mind if you add them just explain if that's what you mean above. Chubbennaitor 07:36, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, that's what I meant. If I could add them [the pictures] to the various articles. Ayrton Prostsign 09:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The answer was the title. Chubbennaitor 16:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Brillant edit

Hi

I made the changes per your guidance

Please have a look

Best

Fttxguru (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looks great! Anything else you'd like me to give pointers/advice/and etc on? Ayrton Prostsign 21:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


Hi

Thx for your guidance, happy you think it is okay. What is the next procedure. I left the notice the paper needs some "brushing".

Is there any procedure people read and approve and release it?

Thx

Fttxguru (talk) 13:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for 2009 Malaysian Grand Prix edit

Updated DYK query On April 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2009 Malaysian Grand Prix, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Shubinator (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think that particular entry could have stated a more interesting fact like "it was the fifth race in F1 history to have half-points awarded", but whatever. I'm glad to see it came up anywho. Ayrton Prostsign 12:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
The "half-points" hook was convoluted and more obscure to Wikipedia readers, which is why the other hook was chosen. Nice collaborative work on the article! Shubinator (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I see your point, and thanks, I was surprised to see how many people bent their backs over to bolster its bytes up as well. =) Ayrton Prostsign 09:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

I appreciate the barnstar. I don't like coming across vandalism when reading articles, so I make contributions where I can. With help from dedicated users like yourself, we'll at least have some effect :) Tiderolls 00:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rock on! Ayrton Prostsign 12:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I know whatcha mean about the archiving. I've been so addicted to the rollback and learning what to do (and what NOT to do), that I haven't taken the time to read the archiving tutorial. One more thing on the "stop procastinating" list :o\ Tiderolls 13:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
You could get a bot to archive your talk page automatically for you, see here for a start. Ayrton Prostsign 13:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the link. I need all the help I can get. Sorry for the my page/your page mess, but you never know when users will log in. So I wanted to make sure you got the new message alert. Tiderolls 13:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Don't mention it. As for our conversation spread, don't worry about that either. It's not a problem, seriously. Ayrton Prostsign 14:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kubica edit

Hi again - I have tried to discuss the recent argument over the Robert Kubica article at Loosmark's talk page. He's not answering me but I thought I'd let you know anyway. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks for the heads up, I'll see if I can join in somehow. Ayrton Prostsign 11:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Soccer edit

"Americans" haven't been linking it to "soccer", the page was originally named Football (soccer) and stayed like that for 5 years, it was only changed to Association football after the 14th or 15th rename request late in 2007 and since we're advised against fixing links to redirects which aren't broken there are thousands of articles that still link to the original title. Nanonic (talk) 16:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I'm just a really stressed at the moment, I don't know why I burst out like that. Apologies if I offended anyone. Ayrton Prostsign 16:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Don't worry about it, the whole naming thing is a real annoyance for everyone who works on football articles and we'd love to see it corrected everywhere but keep get thrown back by policies and other blocks. Nanonic (talk) 17:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm just waiting for the user Peejay (or anyone for that matter) to fill me in as to why a renaming of the 'Catergory:Football (soccer) terminology' to 'Catergory:Association football terminology' was rejected. If possible, I am going to bring back up this issue. Not only is it an annoyance as you pointed out, the whole affair also dents Wikipedia's image of proffessionalism. I think the conflicting titles just make the whole project look disorganized and indecisive. Pathetic, really. Ayrton Prostsign 17:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Ayrton Prost. You have new messages at HairySammoth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talk page archiving edit

You may not remember, but a while back you helped me with a archive template link. Due to my deep and apparently unalterable technical defficiency, it won't work. If you could take a look and give some pointers it would be appreciated. No hurry...and if you're busy I understand. See ya 'round. Tiderolls 00:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm no good with codes either, so I'll outline my method of archiving.
  • Create a new page titled User talk:Tide rolls/archive [number goes here]
  • Cut all the information from your current user talk, and paste it on the pre-created archive space.
  • Then, last of all, leave a message at the top of the archive page [distinctly so it stands out] informing viewers of its nature. If you want a simple template for this, check out any of my archive pages and use the template set at the top of the page [in edit mode].
  • Finally - this step is optional - link back to the archive page from your base talk page.
It's all very easy, and works fine for me. AyrtonProst Pitwall 16:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

April Newsletter edit

Chubbennaitor 20:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

A note regarding the WPVG Newsletter edit

Due to an apparent lack of interest, the WPVG Newsletter will be switching from a monthly publication schedule to a quarterly one. The next issue be delivered on July 1, 2009 and will pertain to the second quarter of the calendar year. If you have any comments regarding this, or suggestions to improve the newsletter, please post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter.

—VG Newsletter Contributors

I'm Back edit

Hi Ayrton Prost, It's Artichoke-Boy. I just want to thank you for signing the "Vote if you want Artichoke-Boy to come back" petition, and to inform you that I'm now officially un-retired! Thanks so much for your support. Artichoke-Boy (talk) 20:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Athletics edit

I'm pretty sure you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Athletics, no? Still in the proposals stage so much input would be welcome. Cheers! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)WIKIPROJECT ATHLETICS NEEDS YOU! 11:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Great! Thanks for your offer! AyrtonProst Pitwall 15:43, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your username edit

Nice one, just noticed it. But OMG, how could you possibly combine the two, that has to be against a law somewhere. :) There is only one greatest F1 driver ever, look at how Senna drove in the rain (and I do have direct experience with how much rain can fall on the grandstands of an F1 track, as I recall Senna ran out of fuel on the last lap too and we all went nuts) (Oh yes, what about the race where he never made a single pit-stop?). I propose pistols at dawn. ;) Franamax (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hahaha, I am so awesome so stuff like this just happens. =p
I never had the privilege of ever seeing Senna race, as I was born a year before he was killed, but all my respect comes from the tons I've read about him through personal research. His rivalry with Prost was just insane, and it makes me laugh what a big deal people made over Lewis and Fernando back in '07. Thinking about it, I picture Senna at his prime as just a cooler version of Schumacher - who for the record is a simply phenomenal individual in his own right. XD AyrtonProst Pitwall 15:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dinosaur names edit

Hi Ayrton,

Thanks for your recent contributions to several dinosaur articles. Regarding this fix, I've reverted it, as "Sauropoda dinosaur" is not correct grammar. Supersaurus is a sauropod dinosaur, not a Sauropoda dinosaur. I realize that you probably wanted to avoid the redirect, but we're encouraged not to do that anyway.

I've noticed you're also adding italics to dinosaur names. Per Wikipedia:DINO#Dinosaur_taxa_naming_conventions, they get italics if they're scientific names (Apatosaurus, Diplodocus, Brontosaurus, etc) but don't if they're common names (apatosaur, brontosaur, etc.)

Hope this helps. :) Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 08:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Ayrton,
The line breaks you've placed here will be removed automatically the next time a WP:AWB edit is made. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 09:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Heya Ayrton,
Just saw that you added your name to WP:DINO. Welcome aboard. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 20:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Oh man, I'm so sorry about that. Guess it's just a part of my learning curve, apologies once more. I'll make sure it won't happen again. Thanks for your time though. :-) AyrtonProst Pitwall 15:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

correcting postition of topicons edit

Hi! Ayrtton,

I just corrected positioning of topicons on your userpage, wiki fairy and wiki genome were overlaping. Hope you'll not mind my edit on your userpage.

--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 12:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, cool - thanks! AyrtonProst Pitwall 15:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (May) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 02:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

you might wonder... edit

I'm in China right now and probably sending you this message at midnight right now..--The other shadow 03:53, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations edit

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Wikipedia) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Wikipedia. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Wikipedia community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 21:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Reporting administrator edit

An administrator by the name of User:Cuchullain has reverted my edits, 2 of them without any reason http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aisha&diff=297553810&oldid=297546132 . I have been threatened by the said administrator that I will be blocked from editing.I find this unfair and wish to report him . I would like to know how do I do this?--Gnosisquest (talk) 09:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is WP:CANVASSING, he's copy and pasted the same note to other users. Thanks,--Cúchullain t/c 13:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The WPVG Newsletter (Q2 2009) edit

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 4 — 2nd Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2009, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 15:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (June) edit

--Midgrid(talk) 16:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

hi blooded edge! edit

ncie to be back--The other shadow 21:42, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Motto of the Day edit

Hi there, Ayrton Prost! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –pjoef (talkcontribs) 12:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (July) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 22:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Athletics edit

Hi there mate! I hope you got much done in your time away from editing. I'm glad you decided to focus on your GCSEs instead: any improvement to athletics articles is always very welcome, but its good that you have had your priorities right. With so much to do it's easy to get carried away, I know that very well! Just remember to enjoy editing in your own time, there's no pressure to get things done in a hurry here. Take care and I'll see you around! Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)Join WikiProject Athletics! 01:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (August) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 15:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please update your status with WP:VG edit

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:20, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (September) edit

--Midgrid(talk) 11:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The WPVG Newsletter (Q3 2009) edit

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 5 — 3rd Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2009, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 04:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Largest prehistoric organisms edit

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Largest prehistoric organisms. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Largest prehistoric organisms. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (October) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 16:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (November) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 23:59, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Another gentle ping from WP:VG edit

Dear Ayrton Prost,

You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 21:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (December) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 11:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

The WPVG Newsletter (Q4 2009) edit

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 6 — 4th Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2009, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (January) edit

--Midgrid(talk) 20:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (February) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 19:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:RUN edit

You have made valuable contributions to Wikiproject Running in the past, and we would appreciate you re-engaging. We've made a number of improvements lately including adopting assessment and importance parameters on the template that we place on the talk page of our articles. The project page has been updated to automatically chart the number of articles that have been assessed, and to use bots to provide us with alerts regarding project articles. We are also experimenting with bots that tag articles in project-related categories. However, bots can never replace skilled editors such as you. Please check in and lend a hand. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 19:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (March) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 12:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010) edit

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010) edit

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.
  • Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (April) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 20:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (May) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 17:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (June) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 17:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (July) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 22:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (August) edit

Cs-wolves(talk) 13:49, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Smilodon populator
Rhamphosuchus
Schilleria
Jurassic Park III (arcade game)
Dorsetisaurus
Protostega
Agriotherium
Parviraptor
Zaglossus hacketti
Josephoartigasia monesi
Paramacellodus
Purussaurus
Megalodon (bivalve)
Austrocheirus
Zhuchengosaurus
Saurillodon
Jurassic Park (pinball)
Eurhinosaurus
Isotelus
Cleanup
Jurassic Park (NES game)
Universal Studios Theme Parks Adventure
Elephant
Merge
Venom (comics)
The Hobbit (2012 film)
MSM/MMM
Add Sources
Andy Roddick
Andy Murray
Shark tooth
Wikify
Force India
Tonya Reiman
Fourth cabinet of Per Albin Hansson
Expand
Transformers (film series)
Uintatherium
2007 Hungarian Grand Prix

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rajesh Khanna article in wikipedia edit

i have provided 68 references for the article rajesh khanna in the wikipedia vizz http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajesh_Khanna&oldid=386154337. i need ur help to make it semi protected so that unregistered users do noit edit it at first place. also to my knowledge all sources are mostly from newspapers,magazines,big box office dotcoms, movie websites,interviews by stars. but some registered users like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Active_Banana are indulging in vandalism...simply editing the artcile. if at all by mistake some blog reference is there i request that these registered users be made to understand that they are facts and if at all references need to be added freshly in place of that(blog reference ) then that reference be given and not that the para /sentence e be delete.They should be given a warning that they would be blocked.

i need ur help in finding is that really there are any unrelaible source in the artcile i contributed? i know that all the 68 r relaible and if any are unrelaible then i request that as what i have submitted are all facts so new relaible source can be inserted and scentences may not be deleted. references provided by me are genuine and not bolgs. thats why iam asking for your help as if senior people go through the references , all of u would be satisfied and approve my references.

iam sure that administrators and seniors would agree with me that all the references i provided are genuine and any ways as facts are presented by me ,, we can search for sources and oput it in place of blogs if at all there are...Shrik88music (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Rajesh Khanna article in wikipedia edit

i have provided 68 references for the article rajesh khanna in the wikipedia vizz http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajesh_Khanna&oldid=386154337. i need ur help to make it semi protected so that unregistered users do noit edit it at first place. also to my knowledge all sources are mostly from newspapers,magazines,big box office dotcoms, movie websites,interviews by stars. but some registered users like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Active_Banana are indulging in vandalism...simply editing the artcile. if at all by mistake some blog reference is there i request that these registered users be made to understand that they are facts and if at all references need to be added freshly in place of that(blog reference ) then that reference be given and not that the para /sentence e be delete.They should be given a warning that they would be blocked. i need ur help in finding is that really there are any unrelaible source in the artcile i contributed? i know that all the 68 r relaible and if any are unrelaible then i request that as what i have submitted are all facts so new relaible source can be inserted and scentences may not be deleted. references provided by me are genuine and not bolgs. thats why iam asking for your help as if senior people go through the references , all of u would be satisfied and approve my references. iam sure that administrators and seniors would agree with me that all the references i provided are genuine and any ways as facts are presented by me ,, we can search for sources and oput it in place of blogs if at all there are.Shrik88music (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

WPF1 Newsletter (September) edit

--Midgrid(talk) 16:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010 edit

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2010, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply